Saturday, May 23rd 2009

AMD Plans Massive 45 nm Transition, New CPUs Announced

Industry observer DigiTimes, citing anonymous sources, today reported that AMD is planning to move production of its desktop processors to 45 nm node process by the third quarter of this year.
AMD plans to move production of its desktop CPUs to its 45nm node process in the third quarter, helping to reduce costs, according to sources at motherboard makers.
Currently, only AMD's quad-core Phenom II X4 800 and 900 series (Deneb) and triple-core Phenom II X3 700 series (Heka) CPUs are manufactured under a 45nm process. The company plans to move its dual-core Phenom II X2 500 series (Callisto) and Athlon II X2 200 series to 45nm in June, and quad-core Athlon II X4 600 series and triple-core Athlon II X3 400 series (Rana) in September, the sources noted.
The chipmaker also plans to launch several CPUs during the period between the end of the second quarter and the third quarter. The dual-core Phenom II X2 550 and 545 will launch at the end of the second quarter, and the quad-core Phenom II X4 945 (95W) and 8xx (95W), triple-core Phenom II X3 7xx (95W), quad-core Athlon II X4 630 and 620, triple-core Athlon II X3 435 and 425, and dual-core Athlon II X2 250, 245 and 240 will launch in the third.
AMD also plans to launch 10 low-power consumption CPUs including the Phenom II X4 905e, Phenom II X3 705e and Athlon II X4 605e.
Source: DigiTimes
Add your own comment

104 Comments on AMD Plans Massive 45 nm Transition, New CPUs Announced

#101
Valdez
FordGT90ConceptMy bad, it's 12:1. Core i7 920 took all except two gaming benchmarks:
www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3551&p=14

Only Fallout 3 and Left 4 Dead went to the Phenom. However, the Phenom didn't beat the Core i7 965 in either of those benchmarks; moreover, in all those benchmarks, the Core i7 920 was greater than 60 FPS average.


I agree. AMD threads are doomed to become vs Intel and Intel threads are doomed to become vs AMD.
Those are not realistic benchmarks. I mean who plays fallout 3 in medium with 80 fps, if it is playable with maximum settings + 4xaa + 16xaf?
Nobody. Nobody plays it in medium without aa and af with 80 fps. That's nonsense.

Here is a more realistic benchmark:
www.hardware-infos.com/tests.php?test=64&seite=1

(in all of the 3 game tests the phenom is ahead of i7 in realistic resolution and settings)


Unfortunately a lot of sites do these game test in low or in medium settings just to show that the i7 is ahead in gaming too. But it's not true.
Posted on Reply
#102
Darren
Indeed, Valdez is correct!

It would appear that the Phenom II is faster than i7 in games especially when the pressure is on at @1680x150, with 4x AA, 16 AF.
Posted on Reply
#103
TheMailMan78
Big Member
FordGT90Concept games at 1280 x 1024. You are not going to change his mind about the i7 and gaming. Hes a low resolution gamer. Its kinda like having a vitamin deficiency.
Posted on Reply
#104
Geofrancis
i want to see some low wattage mobile like chips for the desktop platform like the 35w 3800+ ee sff chip that amd released. at the moment you either have to go for a 45w athlon x2 thats getting a bit old or a 45nm e5200 or low end pentium dual core. how many people here would kill for a 35w quadcore?
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 18th, 2024 02:00 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts