Intel Core i3 530 and i3 540 Review 10

Intel Core i3 530 and i3 540 Review

(10 Comments) »

Value and Conclusion - Core i3 530

  • Intel is pricing their Core i3 530 at $125.
  • "Northbridge" module integration
  • New 32 nm process node
  • Low power consumption and heat output
  • Exceptional performance for a Dual Core processor
  • Overclocking potential
  • Price could be a bit lower
  • Memory and PCI-E controller not in processor core
  • Older generation memory controller
  • No IGP control on P55 boards
  • Half of the Clarkdale chip is pure waste for gamers
I'll start the end of this review with the slower and cheaper Core i3 530. Looking at it from a performance point of view it does remarkably well against its competition and it does the job of replacing Core 2 E7000/E8000 series without errors. As for AMD's competition, Phenom II X2 550 is swept away, while triple core Phenom II X3 720 stays on par in most cases. Hyper Threading really gets the job done here for i3 530, enabling it to tackle AMD's triple core processors even with fewer physical cores.
Power consumption under load is almost unreal while overclocking potential is exceptional in every way, especially considering we're dealing with a barely matured 32 nm process node here. Integrated IGP adds additional value if you're building a HTPC or SFF, and if you're a gamer using discrete graphics, you won't be disappointed with the performance of two CPU cores.

Then we get to its price tag and realize it's actually in direct competition with AMD's quad core Athlon II X4 630/635 models, which are even cheaper. They offer a lot more horsepower in general computing and in multi threaded applications, but they're nowhere near Core i3 530's performance in games. So it's a clear choice for gamers... or is it? AMD has its pony for this race in form of triple core Phenom II X3 720. Unlocked multiplier for easier overclocking, three cores that perform almost identical to i3 530, and $20 lower price which cannot be ignored so easily. Core i3 530 has much lower power consumption and great overclocking potential on its side, so it's up to you to wager if an extra $20 is worth it. Either way, i3 530 is a great choice for almost any type of user looking to buy something in this price segment, it's fast, cool, packed with features and overclocks like crazy.
Recommended

Value and Conclusion - Core i3 540

  • Intel is pricing their Core i3 540 at $140.
  • "Northbridge" module integration
  • New 32 nm process node
  • Low power consumption and heat output
  • Exceptional performance for a Dual Core processor
  • Overclocking potential
  • Quad core price tag for dual core processor
  • Memory and PCI-E controller not in processor core
  • Older generation memory controller
  • No IGP control on P55 boards
  • Half of the Clarkdale chip is pure waste for gamers
Core i3 540 is logically faster, but the additional 130 MHz come with a $15 price tag, and that brings this processor into the upper market class, ruled by quad core processors. There's little room here for Core i5 600, let alone Core i3 540, which is slower than AMD's Phenom X4 and Intel Core 2 Quad models, but also somewhat faster than AMD's triple core Phenom II X3 and all dual core Core 2 models. To be fair, it does remarkably well considering we're dealing with a dual core processor here, but it can't match quad core performance and that's a fact. It shouldn't be priced so close to AMD's quad core models, which are better choice for gaming, general or heavy duty computing. If you have heavy overclocking in mind, go for it, you have my blessings. In every other case, there are better, cheaper options that will give you satisfactory performance levels.

Onto closing thoughts for both Core i3 530 and 540. They have proven they're worthy competitors for AMD's offerings and they sent older generation Core 2 E7000/E8000 into deserved retirement. Even Core 2 Quad Q8000 series stand on the edge of the cliff with overpriced tags and not so impressive performance.
Surprisingly though, Clarkdale processors haven't swept away AMD's Athlons and Phenoms, rather Intel is just now competitive and on par with AMD's offerings. In any case, they represent far better choice than Core i5 600, bringing all the important Clarkdale and Westmere features with much lower price tag. Without doubt Core i3 will have a big and happy user base, lots of overclockers, gamers, Intel fans and HTPC builders. But AMD is not dead, it's alive and kicking hard and will continue to do so until Intel finds a way to bring the price of their four-thread Clarkdale to below $100.
Recommended
Discuss(10 Comments)
View as single page
Dec 4th, 2024 17:20 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts