PassMark Inline PSU Tester Review 43

PassMark Inline PSU Tester Review

Value & Conclusion »

Testing Methodology

If you want to make sure a piece of equipment operates as it should by providing accurate readings, you only have to compare its readings with those of a similar tool that is calibrated properly and accurate. This is exactly what I did with PassMark's PSU tester as I compared it to the Faganas ATE station I use to conduct my PSU reviews. The Faganas ATE consists of the following parts:

2x Chroma 63601-5 mainframes
1x Chroma 63600-2 mainframe
10x Chroma 63640-80-80 electronic loads
1x Chroma 63610-80-20 electronic load
1x Keysight AC6804B AC source
1x Keysight DSOX3024A oscilloscope
1x Picoscope 4444 differential USB oscilloscope
1x N4L PPA1530 power analyzer
1x Picoscope TC-08 temperature logger
1x LabJack U3-HV voltage and PWM logger
1x UNI-T UT372 tachometer
1x Keithley 2015 - THD multimeter
1x 3 KVA transformer

The cost of my test system's hardware exceeds US$50,000, while the in-house-developed software—a work in progress for almost ten years now—is priceless.

The power supply I used for all tests was a Super Flower SF-650F14RG. I conducted all tests using the Chroma setup, and I conducted all tests again with the PassMark PSU tester installed between the electronic loads and the power supply.

Results - 12 V1 and 12 V2 Rails

12 V Rails Load Regulation & Ripple
Test12 V112 V1 (PassMark)Diff %12 V212 V2 (PassMark)Diff %
10% Load12.128 V12.136 V0.0712.122 V12.123 V0.01
1.788 A1.626 A9.061.788 A1.740 A2.68
6.12 mV18.00 mV194.11---
20% Load12.111 V12.125 V0.1212.098 V12.104 V0.05
4.092 A3.845 A6.044.097 A4.020 A1.88
5.48 mV18.00 mV228.46---
50% Load12.060 V12.095 V0.2912.021 V12.064 V0.36
11.389 A10.919 A4.1311.415 A11.314 A0.88
7.07 mV21.00 mV197.03---
100% Load12.007 V12.080 V0.6111.923 V12.019 V0.81
23.322 A22.493 A3.5523.491 A23.317 A0.74
9.29 mV29.00 mV212.16--

Voltage readings are accurate enough, and the same goes for the amperage readings at 12 V2. At 12 V1, the amperage readings are not that accurate, while the ripple readings are way too high. PassMark used the capacitors the ATX specification requires, 0.1μF ceramic disk capacitors and a 10 μF electrolytic capacitor, to simulate system loading, so the differences might be due to the measurement technique and the different ripple measurement circuits. We use high-end differential scopes that cost four times as much as PassMark's tester.

Results - Minor Rails

Minor Rails Load Regulation & Ripple
Test5 V5 V (PassMark)Diff %3.3 V3.3 V PassMark)Diff %5VSB5VSB (PassMark)Diff %
10% Load5.021 V5.040 V0.383.299 V3.310 V0.335.052 V5.063 V0.22
1.991 A1.834 A7.882.001 A1.816 A9.250.990 A0.987 A0.30
3.92 mV8.00 mV104.086.96 mV5.00 mV28.162.29 mV--
20% Load5.007 V5.030 V0.463.285 V3.300 V0.465.027 V5.049 V0.44
2.996 A2.786 A7.013.014 A2.782 A7.701.194 A1.191 A0.25
4.48 mV10.00 mV123.216.90 mV6.00 mV13.042.37 mV--
50% Load4.971 V5.020 V0.983.249 V3.290 V1.264.956 V4.999 V0.87
5.03 A4.718 A6.205.079 A4.719 A7.091.816 A1.818 A0.11
4.96 mV8.00 mV61.297.52 mV7.00 mV6.912.75 mV--
100% Load4.908 V4.991 V1.693.184 V3.260 V2.394.818 V4.894 V1.58
9.171 A8.633 AA5.879.328 A8.725 A6.463.115 A3.117 A0.06
7.13 mV8.00 mV12.2010.96 mV7.00 mV36.138.34 mV--

Voltage deviations are low at 5 V and not high at 3.3 V as long as the loads are kept low on this rail. The amperage readings are not very accurate at 5 V and 3.3 V, and the same goes for the ripple readings. Finally, both voltage and amperage readings at 5VSB are very accurate, which is a pleasant surprise. Unfortunately, the PassMark PSU tester doesn't check ripple at 5VSB.

Results - Power Measurements

Overall Power Measurements
TestPowerPower (PassMark)Diff %
10% Load64.959 W62.400 W3.94
20% Load130.019 W127.400 W2.01
50% Load325.062 W322.900 W0.66
100% Load649.817 W651.200 W0.21

The power measurement is a bit off with the light load (10% of the PSU's max-rated-capacity), but with heavier loads, it becomes more accurate, reaching a very low deviation of only 0.21% at full load.

Results - PSU Timings

Timings
ParameterCybeneticsPassMarkDiff ± (ms)
T1252 ms243 ms-9
T22.9 ms3 ms-0.1
T3200 ms192 ms-8

The differences here are not significant. This is a great tool to measure various PSU timings. The only problem is that measuring the T6 (PWR_OK inactive to DC loss delay) timing the way the ATX specification requires takes applying the full load to the power supply.

Results - Slew Rate

T2 Min Slew Rate
ParameterCybeneticsPassMarkDiff ± (ms)
12V1/23.712 V/ms3.7 V/ms-0.012
5V1.22 V/ms1.1 V/ms-0.12
3.3V0.8674 V/ms0.7 V/ms-0.1674
5VSB1.317 V/ms--

Small differences in the slew rate readings, especially at +12 V.
Next Page »Value & Conclusion
View as single page
Jan 7th, 2025 21:06 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts