Friday, November 6th 2009

NVIDIA Reports Financial Results for Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2010

NVIDIA Corp. today reported revenue of $903.2 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 ended Oct. 25, 2009, up 16 percent from the previous quarter and up slightly from $897.7 million reported in the same period a year earlier.

On a GAAP basis, the company recorded net income of $107.6 million, or $0.19 per diluted share, compared with net income of $61.7 million, or $0.11 per diluted share a year ago. Third quarter GAAP results included a benefit to operating income of $25.1 million related to insurance reimbursements received during the quarter. On a non-GAAP basis - excluding the insurance reimbursements and stock-based compensation, as well as their associated tax impact − net income was $110.3 million, or $0.19 per diluted share, compared with $111.4 million, or $0.20 per diluted share, a year earlier.
"We continued to make progress in the third quarter with healthy market demand across the board," said Jen-Hsun Huang, president and chief executive officer, NVIDIA. "Revenue was up from a year ago, with improvement in each of our PC, professional solutions and consumer businesses. It's great to see us shipping orders with our Tegra mobile-computing solution, and growing enthusiasm for our Tesla platform for parallel computing in the server and cloud-computing markets."

Gross margin, on a GAAP basis, increased to 43.4 percent from 20.2 percent in the previous quarter and 41.0 percent a year earlier. On a non-GAAP basis, gross margin was 41.0 percent, up 4.7 points from the 36.3 percent reported in the previous quarter but slightly off from 41.9 percent a year earlier.

GAAP net loss for the nine months ended Oct. 25, 2009 was $199.1 million, or $0.36 per share, compared to a net income of $117.6 million, or $0.20 per diluted share for the nine months ended Oct. 26, 2008. Non-GAAP net income for the nine months ended Oct. 25, 2009, which excludes a $93.9 million net charge related to the weak die/packaging material set that was used in certain versions of our previous generation chips, a non-recurring charge of $140.2 million in connection with a cash tender offer to purchase employee stock options, stock-based compensation charges, and their associated tax impact, was $101.4 million, or $0.18 per diluted share, compared to a net income of $397.7 million, or $0.68 per diluted share for the nine months ended Oct. 26, 2008.

Outlook
The outlook for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 is as follows:
  • Revenue is expected to be up slightly, approximately 2 percent, from the third quarter.
  • GAAP gross margin is expected to be in the range of 40 to 42 percent.
  • GAAP operating expenses are expected to be approximately $305 million.
Third Quarter Fiscal 2010 and Recent Highlights:
  • First major Tegra devices shipped: Microsoft's Zune HD and the Samsung M1.
  • Held first ever GPU Technology Conference, which was 50% oversubscribed, with 1,500 attendees from 40 countries. More than 200 technical sessions were conducted, and presentations were made by 60 emerging companies that utilize the graphics processing unit (GPU).
  • Introduced the next generation CUDA GPU architecture, codenamed "Fermi." The Fermi architecture is the foundation for the world's first computational GPUs, delivering breakthroughs in both graphics and parallel computing.
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory announced plans to use Fermi to build a new supercomputer, which is designed to be the world's fastest.
  • Launched the industry's first development environment for massively parallel computing. The tool, code-named "Nexus", is integrated into Microsoft Visual Studio, so that developers will be able to use Visual Studio and C++ to write applications that leverage Fermi GPUs.
  • Launched NVIDIA RealityServer, a powerful combination of GPUs and software that streams interactive, photorealistic 3D applications to any web connected PC, laptop, netbook or smart phone.
  • Adobe's new Flash Player 10.1 will be accelerated by GeForce, NVIDIA ION and Tegra products, helping to bring uncompromised browsing of rich Web content to netbooks, smartphones and smartbooks.
Non-GAAP Measures

To supplement NVIDIA's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets presented in accordance with GAAP, the company uses non-GAAP measures of certain components of financial performance. These non-GAAP measures include non-GAAP cost of revenue, non-GAAP gross profit, non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP net income, non-GAAP net income per share, free cash flow and days sales in inventory. In order for NVIDIA's investors to be better able to compare its current results with those of previous periods, the company has shown a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures. These reconciliations adjust the related GAAP financial measures to exclude a charge related to the weak die/packaging material set that was used in certain versions of NVIDIA's previous generation chips, net of insurance reimbursements, a non-recurring charge related to a tender offer purchase, a non-recurring charge against cost of revenue related to a royalty dispute, a non-recurring restructuring charge against operating expenses, recurring stock-based compensation charges, and the associated tax impact of these items, where applicable. Free cash flow is calculated as GAAP net cash provided by operating activities less purchases of property and equipment and intangible assets. Days sales in inventory is computed using GAAP ending inventory multiply by the number of days in the period divided by the non-GAAP cost of revenue. NVIDIA believes the presentation of its non-GAAP financial measures enhances the user's overall understanding of the company's historical financial performance. The presentation of the company's non-GAAP financial measures is not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the company's financial results prepared in accordance with GAAP, and our non-GAAP measures may be different from non-GAAP measures used by other companies.
Add your own comment

48 Comments on NVIDIA Reports Financial Results for Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2010

#26
wolf
Better Than Native
Atom_AntiIt is my idea, but think it through! Who would buy Nvidia garphics cards if Ati could supply tons of DX11 cards? Nobody.!
Well that's your opinion and your entitled to it, but keep in mind even if the stores had MORE than enough stock, not all of their cards fits that nicely into a price performance ratio like established Nvidia 9800/GTX200 series, AND ATi 4000 series do, because they have been out so long already, and are nicely established.

There are plenty of reasons not to buy a ATi DX11 card, just like there are plenty of reasons to buy one. you can have your opinion but I severely doubt Nvidia are going under the table to TSMC to effectively sabotage the mass production of ATi's 40nm lineup, I just don't.
Posted on Reply
#27
larzie
In the the 4th quarter of this year if will be the same amount only with a minus in front of it because of all the graphics cards they fried with their new 191.07 drivers.
Posted on Reply
#28
wolf
Better Than Native
larzieIn the the 4th quarter of this year if will be the same amount only with a minus in front of it because of all the graphics cards they fried with their new 191.07 drivers.
Dude I think you are the only one, Many many users are on 191.07 right now, myself included because as of late I prefer WHQL certified drivers.

If you have genuinely made no modifications or overclocks at all that you could attribute to your cards death, and used only WHQL drivers, RMA the card.

anyone else had their card fried by 191.07 drivers?
Posted on Reply
#29
Benetanegia
TheMailMan78Well if you need a 4xxx card go to Tiger. They are local here in Miami and they have STACKS of 4890s all over the damn place.
You know perfectly where I live and unless Tiger, Newegg, etc. have changed their policy they don't ship overseas. I wouldn't buy overseas anyway, last time I did, in an Ebay store I ended up paying more, becase the VAT is applied no matter where you buy from and shipping costs more. Prices are "cheaper" here than there if you exclude VAT. It was a shock for me, because I got a X1950XTX for $289 or 230 euros at the time, when the card costed 450 euros here on retail. In the end I paid almost 370 euros. Well I didn't pay more than if I bought retail here, but I could have found a better deal here AND get in-store warranty, etc.
wolfanyone else had their card fried by 191.07 drivers?
Nope.
Posted on Reply
#30
larzie
wolfDude I think you are the only one, Many many users are on 191.07 right now, myself included because as of late I prefer WHQL certified drivers.

If you have genuinely made no modifications or overclocks at all that you could attribute to your cards death, and used only WHQL drivers, RMA the card.

anyone else had their card fried by 191.07 drivers?
Dude I don't think so. Check out the Nvidia forum:

forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=149983&st=0&gopid=946729&#entry946729

Never overclocked or modified my card.
Posted on Reply
#31
wolf
Better Than Native
That thread has a handful of users experiencing issues that could be the driver, some maybe not, the commonality definitely is the driver, but some people changed drivers and the card still works fine. There are 20 posts in that thread and you think that might affect 4th quarter revenue? we will indeed see.

RMA your card.
Posted on Reply
#32
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
Atom_AntiIt is my idea, but think it through! Who would buy Nvidia garphics cards if Ati could supply tons of DX11 cards? Nobody. It is a good business to Nvidia, also for TSMC. TSMC gets a good amount of money for less work, Nvidia can sell more graphics cards and have more time to make their Femi. I do not believe TSMC cannot improve anything with their 40nm technic after many months:rolleyes:!
TSMC would have no reason to go along with this. ATi has been a loyal customer of TMSC for several generations of cards, while nVidia recently switch to UMC, and only came back to TMSC for 40nm. It is good business practice to not screw over your loyal customers, even if it means getting a new customer that says they will make you more money.

The problem is 40nm isn't perfected yet, but ATi pushed too quickly to get cards out. RV740 was a test for 40nm, and it showed that TSMC couldn't keep up with demand. Things have improved with 40nm, but not to the point where TSMC can supply 40nm parts for an entire line-up of cards. Maybe one or two cards, but not the entirely line-up ATi is trying to push through, along with nVidia's new cards.
Posted on Reply
#33
TheMailMan78
Big Member
newtekie1TSMC would have no reason to go along with this. ATi has been a loyal customer of TMSC for several generations of cards, while nVidia recently switch to UMC, and only came back to TMSC for 40nm. It is good business practice to not screw over your loyal customers, even if it means getting a new customer that says they will make you more money.

The problem is 40nm isn't perfected yet, but ATi pushed too quickly to get cards out. RV740 was a test for 40nm, and it showed that TSMC couldn't keep up with demand. Things have improved with 40nm, but not to the point where TSMC can supply 40nm parts for an entire line-up of cards. Maybe one or two cards, but not the entirely line-up ATi is trying to push through, along with nVidia's new cards.
Why did you bother to reply to that newtekie1? I mean really man? :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#34
HalfAHertz
was thinking the same thing as MM :D

Still Nvidia has its fingers in many butters now. Won't be surprised if in a few years their SoC solutions overtakes their dedicated graphics in profit, considering where the consumer market is heading now.
Posted on Reply
#35
Easy Rhino
Linux Advocate
HalfAHertzwas thinking the same thing as MM :D

Still Nvidia has their fingers in many butters now. Won't be surprised if in a few years their SoC solutions overtakes their dedicated graphics in profit, considering where the consumer market is heading now.
fingers in many butters?
Posted on Reply
#36
HalfAHertz
Lol dunno where that one came from... Was thinking about cooking dinner or something I guess :slap:
Posted on Reply
#37
Edito
I like to see nvidia doin good... keep up the work nvidia...
Posted on Reply
#38
Bjorn_Of_Iceland
Probly would put a chipped dent out due to their "driver shenanigans" once again. But definitely not as a whole.
Posted on Reply
#39
Cheeseball
Not a Potato
Easy Rhinofingers in many butters?
I don't know, but for some reason I found the first quote and Rhino's reply quite funny. :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#40
a_ump
newtekie1Well, the problem is that the 9800GT is $75. The HD4770 is $110. That is over a 45% price increase for what is essentially a less than 10% performance improvement...

The same pretty much goes for the HD4850, also available at $110, but the HD4850 at least offers slightly more than a 10% improvement.
the only problem with that is the 9800GT you linked is $94 not $75. I don't include rebates if you were i'm including what its retailing for. so the price difference isn't 45% but more like 10% performance for HD 4770 is only ~8% better overall but the HD 4850 is ~14% better overall, so IMO ATI wins that one.
Going to the GTS250, and you have a card that outperforms the HD4770 and HD4850, and can be had new for $100, $10 less than either card...
now the GTS 250 from galaxy that you posted is def worth the money, only ~3.6% increase in price but ~4% increase in performance so well worth it, esp if you fold...well at least for now but i think that'll change when GPU3 is out for F@H
Now look at the HD5750, going for $145 right now. A 45% price increase over the GTS250 for a 4% performance increase. I hardly consider that worth it.
Now i can't agree more with you on the HD 57XX series....it blows my mind and makes no sense to me why ATI is retailing them for more than they're worth. However this is where ATI counters the GTS 250, your galaxy linked GTS 250 is $114, but the HD 4870 is $124.
11.4% increase in price, but ~ 17% increase in performance worth it. Personally i'd grab the HD 4870 simply because the GTS 250 you linked is galaxy n i haven't owned a galaxy but it doesn't have a good rep, as its egg rating shows.
Moving onto the HD5770, and you have a card that sells for $170. Of course the GTX260 216SP outperforms it and goes for $145 new.
idk where you got $145 from but the cheapest GTX 260 i can find is $164 from palit and galaxy. Now here i would argue that the HD 4870 is 124 and the GTX 260 is 40 bucks more, ~30% more in price, and performance is only 13% but we all know that the higher you go up in performance the price ratio get obscurred and abysmal. So i stop here as the GTX 260 c216 when compared to the HD 4870 has horrible price/perf but the HD 4890 is only ~6% better yet increases by $34.
Of course, like I've said before, another large issue is the supply problems that ATi has been having. While the HD5800 series is better than nVidia's higher end offering both in price and performance, they are nearly impossible to find. They go out of stock almost as fast as they come in. This allows nVidia to sell the much weaker GTX285 for $360.
So to summarize our discussion i think the ATI def wins the <$150 market but after that when you look at price increases and performance increases both ATI and Nvidia start to increase price much more than the performance increases so its a toss up and depends on ones budget after that imo. However i don't believe ATI is manufacturing any cards but the HD 4890 now in that family, so if it comes down to only having HD 5XXX series...ATI better lower prices cause the perf/price ration on their new mainstream gen just makes no sense.

so i agree with you on the higher end market of the mainstream segment but disagree with the 9800GT and GTS 250 being better offers statement.

Posted on Reply
#41
SteelSix
nVidia is a company with vision, a company able to diversify when diversification is crucial to long term success. True they've had pains; but they'll survive..
Posted on Reply
#42
a_ump
lol i don't think anyone is questioning whether Nvidia will survive or not, i mean ATI went to hell n now they're back. Once Nvidia gets Fermi going it'll be a beast for sure, but until then ATI dominates. Anyways I'm curious how nvidia plans to have another good Q of profit this year when ATI is on the ball, i mean yea they have a shortage now but if i owned a company i wouldn't bank on whats going on currently but what could happen in the coming months, like TSMC getting better yields with time as has always been the case.
Posted on Reply
#43
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
a_umpI don't include rebates
I do, and that is likely where the difference come in. Of course the 9800GT is just as good of a buy as the HD4850, and a better buy than the HD4770 if you aren't considering rebates...

And the GTS250 is a better buy than both...

I find that in dicussions like this the ATi side tend to not consider rebates, I wonder if that is because most ATi manufacturers don't offer rebates and the rebates on nVidia cards makes them better buys...:laugh:
Posted on Reply
#44
gaximodo
newtekie1I find that in dicussions like this the ATi side tend to not consider rebates, I wonder if that is because most ATi manufacturers don't offer rebates and the rebates on nVidia cards makes them better buys...:laugh:
QFT :roll: it's very similar to AMD's real man use real core comment
Posted on Reply
#45
TheMailMan78
Big Member
newtekie1I do, and that is likely where the difference come in. Of course the 9800GT is just as good of a buy as the HD4850, and a better buy than the HD4770 if you aren't considering rebates...

And the GTS250 is a better buy than both...

I find that in dicussions like this the ATi side tend to not consider rebates, I wonder if that is because most ATi manufacturers don't offer rebates and the rebates on nVidia cards makes them better buys...:laugh:
Not true at all man. I got one of my 4850's for 90 bucks when the retail was 159!
Posted on Reply
#46
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
TheMailMan78Not true at all man. I got one of my 4850's for 90 bucks when the retail was 159!
No, generally it is true, but there are always a few exceptions.
Posted on Reply
#47
gaximodo
And I got one of my 275 for 200 AUD when the other one cost me 300, and retail was around 320 something, special deals doesn't count. Price should based on deals that everyone could get
Posted on Reply
#48
a_ump
well there's no point in discussing that anymore i suppose, and i hope you were just speaking generally about the "ATI fans ignore rebates" and not directly at me...as u can see i have a 7800GTX, had 2 8800GT's, and an HD 4870. The reason i don't include rebates is because i've never used them personally, never thought it was worth the hassle cause i've read that a lot of companies are slow at getting them out so i always said f*ck it lol. I think we've both made valid points, but as always it depends on the person, for me i don't include rebates so ATI may be a better buy for me, but you(@newtekie1) include rebates and i assume you use them so nvidia would probly be the better buy.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 22nd, 2024 22:24 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts