Wednesday, April 11th 2012
MacBook Pro 2012 Launch Imminent
Over the past few days, several retailers have been reporting shortages of 15-inch MacBook Pro 2011 (including its variants based on higher processor clock speeds), suggesting that Apple is lowering its production to make way for the new 2012 MacBook Pro. Apple is a known early-adopter of technologies, and the advent of low-TDP 22 nm "Ivy Bridge" processors by Intel could catalyze 2012 MacBook Pro.
The new MacBook Pro launch is imminent, according to Apple Insider, and could happen any time this month. We know from older reports that by design, the new MacBook Pro closely resembles Apple's successful MacBook Air. The new MacBook Pro could be driven by Intel's Core i7-3820QM or Core i7-3720QM "Ivy Bridge" quad-core processors, with integrated Intel HD 4000 graphics, and options for discrete graphics.
Source:
AppleInsider
The new MacBook Pro launch is imminent, according to Apple Insider, and could happen any time this month. We know from older reports that by design, the new MacBook Pro closely resembles Apple's successful MacBook Air. The new MacBook Pro could be driven by Intel's Core i7-3820QM or Core i7-3720QM "Ivy Bridge" quad-core processors, with integrated Intel HD 4000 graphics, and options for discrete graphics.
38 Comments on MacBook Pro 2012 Launch Imminent
Afaik Macbook Pro's were only available in 13", 15" and 17".
So are they introducing an 11" model?
You go ahead and enjoy that. Where's my IPS retina screen? What is up with that horrible construction quality?
"Mine was replaced two times during the first month of use!
The first one died a week after I bought it. It could not power on."
Second of all you have an option for an IPS 10-bit DreamColour screen which is considered one of the best laptop screens you can buy at the moment.
Third, did you ever use or try one? Because I tryed both the MBP and the 8560w (which I then bought) and all I can say that it's built like a tank (magnesium alloy is stronger than aluminium alloy).
Don't bother writing a reply before doing a little bit of reasearch.
here's another:
"Not my choice, my company bought them for the entire office. What a terrible waste of money.
This thing doesn't go anywhere, it will die on my desktop just behind the real workstation.
>3Kg, 2 hours battery life, bad wifi reception, seriously, who need it? I can't figure it out yet."
Why iPhone4S and iPad3 has a retina display ? It's false marketing by Apple.
"A display of approximately 300 ppi at a distance of 12 inches (305 mm) from one's eye, or 57 arcseconds per pixel[42] is the maximum amount of detail that the human retina can perceive."
Thats their backup, still a display of 2880x1800 on a laptop is pretty amazing. I want a PC like this.
And I had no issues at all with my unit, rock stable for daily usage with CAD.
Those mobile workstations don't have any of the features of the MBP, and vice versa. I would not get a MBP for cad ever; you were 100% right to choose what you chose. But you would not get an HP mobile workstation over an MBP for everyday general use, or music production, or web design or any of the other areas where the MBP is strong.
How many DJ booths you've ever seen with an HP Portable Workstation on them?
The competition is: Sony Viao, Razer Blade, and all of the other high end ultra thin laptops which either offer inferior features or are the same price if not more. The pricing is high but you do get what you pay for in terms of design and user experience.
A 21-24" monitor in the 2560x1440 to 2880x1620 range would be a nice next step in monitors; something in the 200+ ppi range.
anyway, the new macbook pro is incredible and once again apple has to pave the way for better technology using better screens and better build quality than any other company. one day the boys at sony or HP or samsung may actually put something out that is better.
I've been carrying ~10lb laptops around since highschool :D
they screw it up with crazy high prices and asinine policies, but their hardware is top notch :)
anyway, i don't think apple's prices are high when you consider how their products lead all other manufacturers. the fact that people are willing to pay the price means it is not too high. truth be told, companies like HP, sony and samsung have to keep their prices low just to attract potential buyers away from apple. if they too could raise their prices and get away with it they would! but dollar for dollar apple is better!
And how is their hardware top notch? It's the same with every manufacturer out there..If Samsung wanted to put an IPS panel in a laptop. They would have done it by now...
Wait, you have to hold it like your phone, and use a cover if you want wifi.
Google "macbook wifi"
"So I don't look like a dork holding it this way and that so it works."
Also, I buy cheaper Toshiba laptops, why?, cause at the end of the day they work and when a user breaks one its alot easier to replace than a $2000 macbook
Long story short you are paying a premium for a premium product in MBA (believe me, UX31, the supposed best ultrabook doesn't come close to it), and I am a happy user.
Disclosure: the MBA is not mine, but I use it with enough regularity to do a mini review. I will consider getting an ultrabook for my next portable machine if the graphics improve to about 400% of what HD3000 is right now.
It also cost less than half as much, and has harman kardon speakers that, dare I say, sound alright, considering its a laptop.
Plus my old laptop was dropped out of my company car numerous times (Explorer), took a cup of coffee and all it needed was a new $19 replaceable keyboard, and took a 10 foot fall that broke the screen $130 ish. It still works, just needed a larger hard drive and it was time for a new one. Still have it for a backup.
Anyone with a MBA care to try?
Costs half as much, but MBA is lightweight and I would gladly spend quite a lot for that premium (lugging it to and from uni with books daily is a pain, I gave up carrying the K50 to uni but I still occasionally bring the MBA). Prices will fall over time, so the next laptop I get should have a much narrower price premium than MBA.
MBA's speakers are "suitable for use", but I wire the sounds over my earphones anyway so it doesn't really matter to me.
I never drop the MBA, so I can't really comment on how robust it is. I never drop any laptop ever either, or spilt coffee on them, so a robust laptop is not high on my priority.
My only conclusion is that the laptop you are using suits your purpose, and MBA suits mine fine (because most of its issues does not affect me). If there are anyone in my position, I would ask them to consider getting an ultrabook. I will not stoop low enough to diss any product simply because it does not agree with my uses/philosophy in one way or another.