Saturday, April 14th 2012

14 nm "Broadwell" A True System-on-Chip (SoC)

With the 14 nm "Broadwell" architecture, Intel will take a new step towards integration of the platform-controller hub (PCH) with the CPU, by designing it to be a multi-chip module (with the CPU+northbridge in one die, and PCH on the other). This would make "Broadwell" a true System-on-chip (SoC), which allows over 90 percent of the system's I/O to be routed to the processor socket, including memory, PCI-Express, SATA, USB, etc. Although not the first to the industry with single-chip chipsets and integrated memory controllers, Intel rapidly reshaped the arrangement between CPU and core-logic, over the past four years.

It began with transfer of memory controller from northbridge to CPU die (45 nm "Bloomfield"), and transfer of the entire northbridge to the CPU die (45 nm "Lynnfield"). The graphics northbridge transferred a little more gradually, first as multi-chip module with a separate CPU die (32 nm "Clarkdale"), then complete integration with the CPU die (32 nm "Sandy Bridge"). All through, the southbridge, or I/O controller hub (ICH) remained outside the CPU package, with the addition of a display output logic, it transformed into a "platform controller hub" (PCH), which is still just a glorified southbridge. Naturally then, such a drastic relocation of system components will warrant a socket change.
Source: ComputerBase.de
Add your own comment

32 Comments on 14 nm "Broadwell" A True System-on-Chip (SoC)

#26
hellrazor
mastrdrverJust thinking out loud here, but what is the appeal for Intel to make PCIe lanes accessible to anything outside the PCH after everything does truly become a SoC?

They already have graphics, USB 3.0, Sata 6, etc.

I'm not trying to be doom and gloom here. Just thinking that outside of server stuff, it doesn't appear to me as if Intel has a compelling reason to make CPU PCIe lanes available.
Easier bandwidth; it's like taking the middleman out.
Posted on Reply
#27
faramir
radrokBroadwell should be a tock, so it is a new architecture, not a shrink and like every Intel's tock it won't be compatible with the previous socket.
Haswell (tock) 1150-> Haswell Shrink (tick) 1150 -> Broadwell (tock) unknown socket :)
Actually Broadwell is supposed to be a Haswell die shrink from 22 nm to 14 nm.

Its successor architecture is supposed to be Skylake (14 nm), followed by Skymont (10 nm ?).
Posted on Reply
#28
shellx
I'm trying to imagine what will be the layout of the motherboard with no chipset. The producers will just make sure to have something to differentiate the base models and top models. And above all names to be attached to motherboards. Up to date are based on the chipset name.
Posted on Reply
#29
Xiphos
just looking at the picture, and looks like every time we have a chipset architecture change we get a big boost in performance. so skip Haswell and wait for Broadwell?
Posted on Reply
#30
xenocide
Xiphosjust looking at the picture, and looks like every time we have a chipset architecture change we get a big boost in performance. so skip Haswell and wait for Broadwell?
I think you're reading it incorrectly. What you said is half correct, whenever we have a CPU Architecture change, we get a big boost in performance, not really chipset. So 22nm Haswell will be a big improvement, but 14nm Haswell will be a slight performance gain. Similar to how SB was a big jump in performance, but IB won't really be that huge.
Posted on Reply
#31
xBruce88x
i can see the pros and cons to SOC... pros being power consumption and tdp, cons being the components that would normally be on a motherboard, if they go bad on the cpu there goes your cpu pretty much. overclockers may want to be extra careful with soc cpus.
Posted on Reply
#32
radrok
faramirActually Broadwell is supposed to be a Haswell die shrink from 22 nm to 14 nm.

Its successor architecture is supposed to be Skylake (14 nm), followed by Skymont (10 nm ?).
Yeah, I got it mixed up because the change to SoC made me think it would have been a tock.
Thanks ;)
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 24th, 2024 19:32 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts