Monday, May 14th 2012

Apple Invites Kaspersky to Improve OS X Security

Weeks after security mogul Eugene Kaspersky opined that Apple is "10 years behind Microsoft on security," Kaspersky Lab revealed that it is collaborating with Apple to investigate security concerns (read: vulnerabilities) of its operating systems, and improve its security. Kaspersky Lab CTO Nikolai Grebennikov in an interview with Computing.co.uk was quoted saying "Apple recently invited us to improve its security."

Kaspersky Lab maintains that Apple's software is extremely vulnerable, going as far as to claim that Apple doesn't pay enough attention to security. "Our first investigations show Apple doesn't pay enough attention to security. For example, Oracle closed a vulnerability in Java, which was a target for a major botnet several months ago," said Grebennikov. Apple's decision to handle updates of Java runtime environment for OS X by itself, breaking away from Oracle's update cycle, particularly drew flack from Grebennikov. "Apple blocked Oracle from updating Java on Mac OS, and they perform all the udpates themselves. They only released the patch a few weeks ago - two or three months after the Oracle patch. That's far too long," he said. Kaspersky isn't too optimistic about the infinitely more popular iOS platform, either. "Our experience tells us that in the near future, perhaps in a year or so, we will see the first malware targeting iOS," it commented.
Source: Computing.co.uk
Add your own comment

31 Comments on Apple Invites Kaspersky to Improve OS X Security

#26
Galas
I was obiously thinking i would find apple haters in this thread.
M$ su*ks sweaty donkey balls regarding OS security and vulnerabilities. And pretty much everything else.
If you want a robust system, and you are actually able to use it. Go and use a Unix flavoured OS.
Posted on Reply
#27
Wile E
Power User
GalasI was obiously thinking i would find apple haters in this thread.
M$ su*ks sweaty donkey balls regarding OS security and vulnerabilities. And pretty much everything else.
If you want a robust system, and you are actually able to use it. Go and use a Unix flavoured OS.
Unix is not any more secure than Windows 7. It's been proven at every hacking convention.
Posted on Reply
#28
Galas
Wile EUnix is not any more secure than Windows 7. It's been proven at every hacking convention.
I think you went to the wrong hacking convention :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#29
Prima.Vera
Java and Flash. Worst software inventions ever!

Sorry, I had to say that...
Posted on Reply
#30
Wile E
Power User
GalasI think you went to the wrong hacking convention :laugh:
I think you haven't gone to any since the XP days. Win 7 is usually the last to fall at the conventions. Win 7 is every bit as secure as unix if you leave the security features on. Most exploits happen through 3rd party software, and even those are quickly patched if found. The days of being able to bash Windows for being insecure are long gone.

As it stands, OS X (a UNIX based OS) is actually the least secure platform right now. Only because Apple is very slow to patch vulnerabilities. The only reason we don't see more malware is because not many are bothering for such a small market share.
Posted on Reply
#31
suraswami
GalasI was obiously thinking i would find apple haters in this thread.
M$ su*ks sweaty donkey balls regarding OS security and vulnerabilities. And pretty much everything else.
If you want a robust system, and you are actually able to use it. Go and use a Unix flavoured OS.
Welcome to TPU, Mr. Caveman!

Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 18th, 2024 09:55 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts