Friday, May 29th 2015

AMD "Fiji XT" SKU Name Revealed, ATI Rage Legacy Reborn?

Since March, we've been hearing whispers that AMD could give the topmost tier SKU based on its swanky new HBM-equipped "Fiji" silicon a fancy name, just as NVIDIA names its top-dog the GTX TITAN. That name could be the AMD Radeon FURY. A similar name to the brand that launched the erstwhile ATI, with its Rage series, Radeon FURY will be AMD's (and probably the industry's) fastest GPU, and will compete with NVIDIA's GeForce GTX TITAN X.

The card itself is quite diminutive, but that's because of two reasons - with memory being moved to the GPU package, a large amount of PCB real-estate is saved, and so the card can make do with a smaller PCB; and because the rear-end of the card is where the fittings for its AIO liquid-cooling solution are located. These tubes lead to a 120 x 120 mm radiator, with a single 120 mm PWM fan. Given that such a contraption could cool the dual-GPU R9 295X2, it should be effective with the Radeon FURY, just as well. The card will draw power from a pair of 8-pin PCIe power connectors. Display outputs will include three DP 1.2a and one HDMI 2.0. The brand naming indicates that AMD wants to change the terms on which its top-end product competes with NVIDIA's. Low noise and high-performance will be the focus, not power draw. Nobody buys an Aventador for its MPG.
Source: ChipHell
Add your own comment

101 Comments on AMD "Fiji XT" SKU Name Revealed, ATI Rage Legacy Reborn?

#101
HumanSmoke
arbiterThe 980ti's performance is about were most people thought, well the expect same titan gpu not one with some cores disabled but performance is still pretty close only around 10%.
Probably less in actual gaming situations. Most sites seem to settle on a 3-4% deficit - the 8% lower shader count is offset somewhat by the 980 Ti being able to maintain its boost at a higher rate for longer without throttling (in a reference
arbiterIssue with 8gb one comes down to how much of a premium is it gonna have over 4gb one.
The immediate issue is probably yield - not of the HBM necessarily, but assembling the interposer module. That's a lot of micro-solder bumps to flow.
yea when Nvidia has made claims about the product it has pretty much worked as they claimed. Reason AMD has been bad with that lately is due to playing catch up to match nvidia in something nvidia has spent almost a year working on where as AMD playing catch up does it in half the time.
Steep learning curve for AMD. Nvidia had the luxury of integrating compute functionality, and shaping how it works, back in 2003 or so, when they began laying down the architecture for the G80. The company were blessed with a GPU that swept all before it allied with AMD screwing up with the R600 - after that it became a game of tweaking the functionality. AMD hasn't had that luxury, and Nvidia hasn't slipped up - hence playing the game of catch up.
XzibitPCGameshardware.de

This time its not fairies but a kitty.

Amazing that someone took the time to fake up a screenshot (yet again no pictures of the actual card!), but couldn't even be bothered finding out Fiji's correct device ID , which of course is 7300. I don't think Chiphell's forum posters are even trying at this point.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 25th, 2024 09:57 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts