Thursday, October 20th 2016

AMD Readying an Answer to GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

With the arrival of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GTX 1050, the sub-$150 graphics card market is beginning to heat up. AMD is finding itself with a price-performance gorge between the Radeon RX 460 and the RX 470. Citing multiple sources, VideoCardz suspects that AMD is up to something - a new Polaris 10 "Ellesmere" based SKU positioned between the RX 460 and RX 470, referred to either as the "RX 465" or the "RX 470 SE."

The new SKU is further cut down from the Polaris 10 stack, in a bid to lower TDP below the 100W mark, to around 90W. The chip features 1,792 stream processors across 28 Graphics CoreNext compute units (CUs), out of the 36 CUs physically present on the chip. The RX 470 features 32 CUs, while the RX 480 maxes out all available CUs. AMD is leaving the memory bus untouched. It features 4 GB of GDDR5 memory across a 256-bit wide memory interface, ticking at 7.00 GHz (GDDR5-effective), churning up 224 GB/s of memory bandwidth - double that of the GTX 1050 series. There's also talk of yet another SKU, with 1,536 stream processors (24/36 CUs enabled), which AMD could position against the GTX 1050 (non-Ti).
A quick trot through 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme and 3DMark Time Spy scores released by a ChipHell Forums user with access to a sample, reveals that stock speeds and 100% power-limit, the 1,792-SP SKU is about 11 percent slower than the RX 470 4 GB in Fire Strike Extreme, and about 11.7 percent slower at Time Spy. It's expected that should this card outperform the GTX 1050 Ti, AMD could position it competitive yet slightly higher than the US $139 NVIDIA is asking for its card.
Sources: ChipHell, VideoCardz
Add your own comment

31 Comments on AMD Readying an Answer to GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

#27
arterius2
I think the real answer to any of these plethora of mid-range cards is to just squeeze couple more bucks out of your wallet. Which shouldn't be that difficult, pizza pockets anyone?
Posted on Reply
#28
bug
arterius2I think the real answer to any of these plethora of mid-range cards is to just squeeze couple more bucks out of your wallet. Which shouldn't be that difficult, pizza pockets anyone?
True, within this price range a few more bucks usually net a significant increase in performance (unlike at the high end). The problem is while on a budget, there's always a cut-off point.
Otherwise any buying decision would go like:
1. let me get a cheap video card
2. that RX460 looks good for $99
3. no, at $109 the GTX 1050 is faster; that's just $10 more
4. yeah, no, for $139 the GTX1050Ti is even faster; hm, $30 more, a bit of stretch, but it's worth it for the performance gains
5. no, wait, for $169 I can have the RX 470; add $30
6. ah, look at that shiny RX480 4GB/GTX 1060 3GB for the low price of $199; +$30
7. nope, at $229 the RX480 8GB is a better buy; +$30
8. oh wait, I can have the GTX 1060 6GB for only $249; add $20.
9. stop, because the next price jump is quite steep.
Posted on Reply
#29
arterius2
bugTrue, within this price range a few more bucks usually net a significant increase in performance (unlike at the high end). The problem is while on a budget, there's always a cut-off point.
Otherwise any buying decision would go like:
1. let me get a cheap video card
2. that RX460 looks good for $99
3. no, at $109 the GTX 1050 is faster; that's just $10 more
4. yeah, no, for $139 the GTX1050Ti is even faster; hm, $30 more, a bit of stretch, but it's worth it for the performance gains
5. no, wait, for $169 I can have the RX 470; add $30
6. ah, look at that shiny RX480 4GB/GTX 1060 3GB for the low price of $199; +$30
7. nope, at $229 the RX480 8GB is a better buy; +$30
8. oh wait, I can have the GTX 1060 6GB for only $249; add $20.
9. stop, because the next price jump is quite steep.
Well said:)
Posted on Reply
#30
bug
Captain_TomFeel free to remind me of my mistake in the future if I am wrong.

And I will remember to laugh at you're rejection of common sense when it turns out I was right. ;)
And here I am, reminding you of your mistake. This new card cannot be 20-30% faster than the 1050Ti, because the fully fledged RX470 is only 25% faster. See: www.techpowerup.com/reviews/MSI/GTX_1050_Ti_Gaming_X/27.html
There you have it.
Posted on Reply
#31
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
The jump to the 480 holy hell.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jul 16th, 2024 19:50 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts