Friday, February 3rd 2017
AMD Ryzen Ashes of The Singularity Benchmarks Surface: Impressive 4K Scores
Ashes of the Singularity seems to be the benchmark tool of choice for upcoming AMD products, for some reason; and it was once again used to benchmark an upcoming AMD Ryzen processor. The benchmark results were quickly deleted after they were posted, but the hardware enthusiast should never be underestimated, and timely screenshot skills always help keep alive these little slips of the trade.
Unlike some previous benchmark leaks of Ryzen processors, which carried the prefix ES (Engineering Sample), this one carried the ZD Prefix, and the last characters on its string name are the most interesting to us: F4 stands for the silicon revision, while the 40_36 stands for the processor's Turbo and stock speeds respectively (4.0 GHz and 3.6 GHz). This is the 8-core, 16-thread SMT-enabled monster of a processor that AMD will be bringing to the table in its uphill battle against Intel, with the Ryzen chip having achieved CPU Framerate scores of 81.4 (normal batch, 73.4 (medium batch) and 60.2 (heavy batch), paired with a Pascal-based NVIDIA Titan X (which would likely point towards the test having been done by an independent, off-AMD labs part).
Source:
PCShopping
Unlike some previous benchmark leaks of Ryzen processors, which carried the prefix ES (Engineering Sample), this one carried the ZD Prefix, and the last characters on its string name are the most interesting to us: F4 stands for the silicon revision, while the 40_36 stands for the processor's Turbo and stock speeds respectively (4.0 GHz and 3.6 GHz). This is the 8-core, 16-thread SMT-enabled monster of a processor that AMD will be bringing to the table in its uphill battle against Intel, with the Ryzen chip having achieved CPU Framerate scores of 81.4 (normal batch, 73.4 (medium batch) and 60.2 (heavy batch), paired with a Pascal-based NVIDIA Titan X (which would likely point towards the test having been done by an independent, off-AMD labs part).
47 Comments on AMD Ryzen Ashes of The Singularity Benchmarks Surface: Impressive 4K Scores
www.overclockers.ua/news/hardware/2017-02-03/119681/
All over the place. I'd rather wait for proper benchmarking. But nonetheless the 3.6 base + 4 GHz turbo @ 95W TDP is a nice fact.
aots same version with same settings - crazy 4k, dx12, fullscreen.
i7 6700k stock. 4c/8t @ 4.0/4.2ghz:
can someone tell me how to make aots bench results public?
edit:
kanan, aots version is extremely important when comparing aots bench results. within the same version benchmark results are actually remarkably stable.
CPU frame rate was 33.9(29.5ms), GPU was 33.3(30.0ms)
Here is my 6950X @4.0 and a single stock Pascal Titan.
Same settings as the article.
Report posts like that... don't respond. ;)update your system specs... ;)
That said, is that 4k??? 142 fps vs 40???????
Looks like you ran the gpu test, no? Cpu results look different my man...
Best to just report.
The goal of the forum is to help others, that's why it's best to get rid of all signs of bad hyperlinks.
Easiest solution is to just edit the links out in the quote, but can still respond.
Sorry if any of this came off as rude, have a great weekend.
Crazy Preset.
GTX Titan X Pascal. No overclock.
GTX 6900K @ 4 Ghz
16GB 3000Mhz CL14
and this is EVEN with 4x AA, not 2x AA as AMD did.
Gentlemen, if you are going to bother testing this, please run the CPU focused test and not GPU. ;)
Fear the hype for those to new to remember bulldozer.
are you sure? on the new horizon event amd paired their ryzen with both at titan x and a vega one
I signed up to respond to your inane remarks re Ashes of the Singularity.
I don't know why you would hijack a discussion of benchmarks for some gratuitous bad-mouthing of the best RTS to come along since Supreme Commander / FA, but there it is. As such, your comments are just as pointless and unhelpful as those on the Ukrainian economy.
And it seems that you haven't even played Ashes! I have, for hundreds of hours, and consider it the best game purchase I've made in a decade. A terrific concept, great execution, and a simply glorious game engine that continues to astonish me with its refinement and capability. This does not rely on Vulkan (do you learn only from headlines?) and unlike most games out there will take advantage of more cores / threads - so of course people will wonder how it benches on Ryzen.
In short, you don't know what you're talking about, and have stupidly damaged the rep of a great game.
Cheers :rockout: