Monday, May 8th 2017
AMD Vega 10 3DMark Fire Strike Results Surface
Another day, another set of Vega results see the light of it. It would seem like this saga has been going on for ages, ever since we've seen AMD showcase its prototype Vega cards running Star Wars Battlefront (4K, Ultra settings at over 60 FPS) and Doom (4K, Vulcan render path at over 60 FPS on pre-production hardware). But with the lack of official information coming from AMD (let's hope this changes on May 16th), it would seem the company is content to see us hardware news sites jumping at every detail and offering free publicity.
This is known to be Vega because the device ID, 687F:C1, was spotted on AMD's own hands while running that Doom demo in 4K. The device clocks seem to be in line with previous leaks: a 1200 MHz core clock and 8GB of video memory running at 700 MHz memory clocks. With these clocks (which are expected to be extremely conservative when we take into account what we know of Vega), the Vega video card manages to deliver a 17,801 points graphics score, approximately 1,400 points more than your average Fury X, but some hundreds less than your average, current-generation GTX 1070. Remember: AMD's MI25 is expected to come in at 1,500 MHz core clocks, and this is a professional, passively-cooled graphics card. This means that unless AMD greatly overestimated the clock capability of its Vega cards, the consumer version of Vega will have necessarily higher clocks. But we'll stay here, waiting for some more details to pour our way, as always.
Source:
WCCFTech
This is known to be Vega because the device ID, 687F:C1, was spotted on AMD's own hands while running that Doom demo in 4K. The device clocks seem to be in line with previous leaks: a 1200 MHz core clock and 8GB of video memory running at 700 MHz memory clocks. With these clocks (which are expected to be extremely conservative when we take into account what we know of Vega), the Vega video card manages to deliver a 17,801 points graphics score, approximately 1,400 points more than your average Fury X, but some hundreds less than your average, current-generation GTX 1070. Remember: AMD's MI25 is expected to come in at 1,500 MHz core clocks, and this is a professional, passively-cooled graphics card. This means that unless AMD greatly overestimated the clock capability of its Vega cards, the consumer version of Vega will have necessarily higher clocks. But we'll stay here, waiting for some more details to pour our way, as always.
60 Comments on AMD Vega 10 3DMark Fire Strike Results Surface
Even after release and third-party reviews people will still blame drivers for poor numbers on either side.
From a strategic standpoint Nvidia is killing AMD due to their much stronger R&D and capital investments. I truly believe that AMD is doing their best to release strong products, but they are limited by their resources to truly compete with Nvidia.
Or 290 leaks.
Or 290x leaks.
Or, goddamn Fury X leaks.
Or, perhaps, 4xxx, 5xxx, 6xxx, 7xxx series leaks.
(I don't recall when wccftech has been created)
You know, I want to see a goddamn pattern and not feel like it's just somebody's FUD repeated multiple times.
Wccf is like TMZ or one of those gossip magazines or something...
Chill ! people chill !:kookoo:
Edit: I realized that I posted in the wrong thread.. posting it again.