Wednesday, June 21st 2017
After Kaspersky's Shots Across the Bow, Microsoft Reacts
You probably have heard about security giant Kaspersky having previously fired some shots (figurative ones, which translated into a very real antitrust complaint recently) towards Microsoft. The gist of the issue stands on Windows' handling of third party security software suites, with Windows sometimes removing those suits' installations on basis of "incompatibility" with more recent Windows versions. Other points of conflict mention the coloring in Windows Defender, where a user's security status appears as "not green", which leads customers towards believing that even though their systems have a third party security software installed, only Windows Defender can really and fully protect them (which is visually conveyed by the Window adopting a green coloring when customers select to activate Windows Defender.)
Granted, Microsoft's response was indirect - probably looking to distance themselves from the matter as much as possible - but it was a response of sorts. In a blog post, Microsoft reiterates that Windows Defender is shipping with Windows so users have a fallback protection on at all times, before they have been able to install their third-party security program of choice, or even in case such a protection expires for any reason. In a blog post, Microsoft states that it is in the consumers' best interest to always have an extra security solution being available without user input, so as to reduce exposure time while customers look for and choose another (or the same) security third party.
The company mentioned the WannaCry debacle, and how it is their mission to provide a full-blown, safe computing environment for users, on top of which they can then add third party solutions. Remember the browser antitrust investigation which resulted in Microsoft including a browser choice window for new installations? That could be one of the possible future solutions by Microsoft to avoid an antitrust investigation - if it really is found that Microsoft is using somewhat underhanded tactics. But that, like most things, is open to debate.
Sources:
Microsoft Blogs, Tom's Hardware, Tom's Hardware
The company mentioned the WannaCry debacle, and how it is their mission to provide a full-blown, safe computing environment for users, on top of which they can then add third party solutions. Remember the browser antitrust investigation which resulted in Microsoft including a browser choice window for new installations? That could be one of the possible future solutions by Microsoft to avoid an antitrust investigation - if it really is found that Microsoft is using somewhat underhanded tactics. But that, like most things, is open to debate.
36 Comments on After Kaspersky's Shots Across the Bow, Microsoft Reacts
On the other hand, I would like to disable Window Defender from continuously re-adding its notification(MSASCui.exe) to HKLM/Run, just goes to show how much m$ loves to be intrusive in one way or another. :shadedshu:
so basically you blacklist entire software FOR LIFE based on a bad experience at one point in time? shouldnt this mean no more windows if you used it at the start of vista, no more amd if you used their cards/drivers in 2011, ignoring how good ryzen is based on how bad amd was last few years, no more modern linux based on how messy & uncompatible it was a few years ago, the list goes on
you could at least take a look eventually if some software is claiming to have changed, or has users reporting that it has, or if there's a large enough userbase
edit: lol.. damnit.. old thread.
Ironically, these bloatware seem to be LESS secure now they are owned by security vendors. :rolleyes: