TotallyI'm not trying to justify their actions, it is within their rights to do. Just as it is within my right to not spend money on it. I'm not going to lose sleep on something, I do not intend to spend a dime on. Talking trash about a company is the same as praising them keeps their name from being forgotten. The way I see it is the default number of save slots are not enough and that is not enough. Thus I would never spend money on the game no matter how good it is (actually if it was good I could reason with you guys). So what I'm ultimately puzzled about and point is that people spent $60 on a shit game and are complaining about a $10 save slot and not the fact that there is only one save slot. Watching gameplay footage, Konami is doing anyone who bought the game a service, no one should ever suffer a second play through.

john_I wonder. If there was NO piracy, would Konami be giving this extra save slot for free? I mean, if we consider what companies say about how much money they are losing from piracy, they could be making 5-10 times more money from the game sales alone. Because everyone who downloads would definitely buy the game at it's full price. Right? So they wouldn't have to charge extra for things like that.
Or would they be asking for $20 knowing that people have NO alternatives?

GoldenXSince when calling a greedy company greedy is racist? It's a greedy company in Japan, it's a typical japanese greedy company.
Man this new trend of being offended...

Valantara) This isn't true. Japanese products aren't more expensive than comparable counterparts in most markets. Is Sony particularly expensive? Nope, not at all. Can you name me a single product category where they're significantly more expensive than the competition?

Prima.VeraAll of the stuff that Sony makes?? Starting with callous prices on TVs, monitors, multimedia stuff and all of the rest of electronics compared to manufacturers from other countries.

ValantarSeriously? Sony TVs are no more expensive than competing brands (although they are rarely the best at their price points, they're by no means overpriced). Sony cameras are generally premium cameras, but no more expensive than comparable options - and often there are no comparable options due to their tech prowess, yet they're still priced close to the closest competitors (such as the Sony A7 lineup compared to the Canon 5D series or similar). Their Vaio lineup, back when they owned it, spanned the entire price range from cheapo crap to ultra-premium ultrabooks-before-they-were-a-thing (even with external graphics!), and roughly matched competitors' prices - again, to the extent that they had competitors. Sony monitors? You mean videography/video production monitors (seeing how they don't make PC monitors outside of these)? They're generally comparable to the competition. The same goes for their AV and Hi-Fi equipment - they main difference there might be that Sony has less of the high-end placebo reputation of smaller western outfits.

natr0n

Enjoy the truth from the astronots

2:38