Monday, October 1st 2018

Extravagant Intel Core i9-9900K Packaging Pictured

Thought AMD is the only chipmaker that can go over the top with packaging its processors? Intel wants to play this game, too. The company is going all out with differentiating its 8-core/16-thread Core i9-9900K socket LGA1151 processor from the rest of the pack. A big part of this is the retail packaging, pictured below. The box, if you can call it that, is an acrylic dodecahedron, a 12-sided 3D object with pentagonal faces. The front face has prominent "Core i9" branding, and marking that confirms that Intel will refer to "Coffee Lake-Refresh" as the 9th generation Core processor family. At this point, we don't know if this voluminous box packs a cooler besides the chip, but the possibility is rather slim. The Core i9-9900K is an 8-core/16-thread socket LGA1151 processor based on the 14 nm++ "Coffee Lake-Refresh" silicon. It is clocked at 3.60 GHz, with a staggering 5.00 GHz maximum Turbo Boost frequency.
Source: momomo_us (Twitter)
Add your own comment

99 Comments on Extravagant Intel Core i9-9900K Packaging Pictured

#51
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
Added more pictures of this low-poly football from FIFA 1998.
Posted on Reply
#52
gmn17
What’s a good cooler for this proc?
Posted on Reply
#53
Prima.Vera
hatWe Americans noticed that overly boring abomination called football many years ago, and we thought it was a name too good for such a silly sport, so we reappropriated it to our totally awesome "USA football" and gave the name soccer to your silly sport. The rest of the world doesn't have to like it, but we just didn't want to bore Americans with soccer when they thought they were gonna see FOOTBALL! However, we invite you to join us in embracing football and putting soccer in its place. :laugh:o_O
I think "you" and the rest of the world have a different understanding of the word "boring" :laugh::laugh::laugh:
I mean you still think Nascar is "driving" or a racing sport... :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:

On topic now,
For that price, is that package containing liquid cooling cooler and pump? and some collectible too?
Posted on Reply
#54
ironcerealbox
Well, it might be called football in 'Murica due to the sport using a prolate spheroid that is almost a foot long...just food for thought.
Posted on Reply
#55
dj-electric
gmn 17What’s a good cooler for this proc?
Depends of OC is included or not. If not, any 3-heatpipe 90MM+fan tower cooler pretty much would do the job. Heat conductivity is proper.

Also, many people in this thread seem to be confused regarding the target audience of this CPU, as per usual.
Posted on Reply
#56
remixedcat
bonehead123REALLY Intel, REALLY...... Who the F*ck cares what the box looks like...

Please explain exactly how many millions of $$ were derailed from the product development and mfgr'ing process to the packaging/marketing dept.....

I'm pretty sure 99.9999% of us here would prefer to have a better, higher performing/faster, cooler, AND cheaper cpu in a less-extravagant box rather than the other way around...

REALLY... WTF ?????????
Too many companies have bigger marketing than development budgets. :(
Posted on Reply
#57
Solid State Soul ( SSS )
With the football design, intel should bundle FIFA 19 with this processor :laugh::roll:
gmn 17What’s a good cooler for this proc?
- Noctua NH-D15
- Dark rock 4 pro
Posted on Reply
#58
GreiverBlade
dwadeExcept they're not the "same." As GPU becomes faster, the difference increases. You pay less for AMD, but you also get less from them. 9900k @ 5GHz will steal the the crown from our current emperor 8700k until Intel decides to usurp their own throne with Ice Lake.

i was not talking about games ... but well not much difference here too ... awwww crap (FX6300 to 4690K not much difference either... and i am not talking about benchmark ...)

8700K emperor? :laugh::roll: that one is also 100/200$ higher than a 2600X/2700X for me ... not worth it for a few fps difference (%'age show wider gap but the true difference is what ... 5-10 fps ... )
5GHZ on 1 core boost ...

and getting less but not much more less is not an issue.

Ryzen did shake up Intel but people still think there is an abyss in IPC between them (oh well ... waiting Ryzen 2 then )
Posted on Reply
#59
Melvis


Just as I expected, this will cost around $760-$800 Australian which is basically double the price of the 2700X which is no where near going to be double the performance.
Posted on Reply
#60
Robcostyle
Bwuahaha. 580$, without taxes ( I know you yanks pay them after the purchase), at amazon?
So, in EU its going to be 650€+margin+stock shortages....and we have 1000€ S1151 CPU! Nicely done!
And where are folks who claimed “competition is guuuud! It will lower da prices!”?
Posted on Reply
#61
GreiverBlade
TheManofSpielHelluva exotic engram there.
nice reference ... except it drops an unwanted exotic at a price i wouldn't even consider unless low range HEDT (personal opinion but i did like the reference... although the color is more ... a encrypted engram which would make it ... well ... )
RobcostyleAnd where are folks who claimed “competition is guuuud! It will lower da prices!”?
actually yep ... competition (red side) have a pretty capable CPU at a more decent price (and even if they counter with a 2800X slightly higher priced than the 2700X it will still be cheaper than the 9900K MSRP) and yep for me the 9900K will be 650-1000€ (580$ is the price of a 8700K :laugh: most of the time for me)
Posted on Reply
#62
Vayra86
Prima.VeraSorry, not sure what you are bubbling about. Football and "soccer" are the same thing. That's why is called FIFA and not FISA. ;)
That overly boring abomination called USA Rugby just stole the name from the REAL sport that is actually using THE FEET to play the ball, not hands :laugh::laugh::kookoo::kookoo:
Hear, hear!

And before we start on what's what... Football in Europe alone is pushing 22 billion in revenue yearly, Rugby across the entire world does just over 2.3 billion;)

Oh, and Europe has the largest share in both :D

Anyway, back to Intel's ugly soccer ball.
Posted on Reply
#63
HTC
RobcostyleBwuahaha. 580$, without taxes ( I know you yanks pay them after the purchase), at amazon?
So, in EU its going to be 650€+margin+stock shortages....and we have 1000€ S1151 CPU! Nicely done!
And where are folks who claimed “competition is guuuud! It will lower da prices!”?
It is "guuuud" so long as the performance is similar but the reverse is also true: if the price is too different while the performance is similar, there's the "danger" the lower price will increase to match it.
Posted on Reply
#64
Robcostyle
HTCthere's the "danger" the lower price will increase to match it.
I think it's gonna be our reality soon. RX Vega is a pure example of that.
Posted on Reply
#65
Dante Uchiha
dwadeExcept they're not the "same." As GPU becomes faster, the difference increases. You pay less for AMD, but you also get less from them. 9900k @ 5GHz will steal the the crown from our current emperor 8700k until Intel decides to usurp their own throne with Ice Lake.

Unfortunately, in this resolution any processor will bottleneck the 2080 ti. This is a sign of IPC stagnation...
Posted on Reply
#66
HTC
RobcostyleI think it's gonna be our reality soon. RX Vega is a pure example of that.
No because there were "unusual" circumstances on top of very high HBM prices: mining craze.

The proof is that it's already possible to find brand new Vega cards @ MSRP prices.

Were it not for the very expensive HBM RAM, i'm sure the MSRP would be much lower. nVidia's cards that also use HBM also cost a lot more so the extra HBM price is more diluted in those cases than in Vega's case.
Posted on Reply
#67
GlacierXD
More than ugly in my opinion, especially comparing to AMD threadripper lineup.
Posted on Reply
#68
TheTechGuy1337
I started busting out laughing, because it is cheaper than nvidia's rtx lineup at least.....I know that isn't saying much.
Posted on Reply
#69
HTC
I don't care if the box is shaped in the form of a unicorn: what matters is what's inside.

That said, the box is actually quite ugly with those colors: perhaps with different coloring it could be more pleasing.

Still, unless it also includes a cooler, it's way too expensive for the extra performance it's supposed to provide (no reviews yet) and even then it depends on the quality of the cooler: if it's like old Intel stock coolers, it's nowhere near enough to justify the difference in price, IMO.

With the Threadripper 2 box, i still don't care about the box itself but, unlike with I9-9900K's approach, it's actually quite pleasing to the eye, IMHO.
Posted on Reply
#70
cucker tarlson
R0H1TYour posts make less sense each passing day, honestly :shadedshu:
He's a very stable genius.
Posted on Reply
#71
moproblems99
R-T-BAt most FPS gaming scenarios it will be darn near identical. I've used both. Not sure what that graph is smoking... but it's likely choosing a very particular intel biased situation. (and before you go "lol everything is" there ARE AMD biased situations too).
Who cares about the FPS when the vast majority of monitors in use are 60-75hz?
RobcostyleAnd where are folks who claimed “competition is guuuud! It will lower da prices!”?
Competition doesn't mean shit if people still buy based on brand and not needs.
Posted on Reply
#72
cucker tarlson
moproblems99Who cares about the FPS when the vast majority of monitors in use are 60-75hz?
You're coming into a 9900K discussion with a "most people play 60Hz" argument. silly.
Tell me,how many ryzen users actually need a 16 thread productivity cpu and how many just count thread per dollar ratio ? games use more threads, but people act as if single core performance was going away as a contributing factor. most of you need to learn the term equivalency. the fact that a game can spread the load across 16 threads does not mean it's equivalent to a fast hexacore at 70% load.

until prices for intel went nuts, AMD had nothing on 8600k, unless you needed 12/16 threads.
Posted on Reply
#73
moproblems99
cucker tarlsonYou're coming into a 9900K discussion with a "most people play 60Hz" argument. silly.
Tell me,how many ryzen users actually need a 16 thread productivity cpu and how many just count thread per dollar ratio ? games use more threads, but people act as if single core performance was going away as a contributing factor. most of you need to learn the term equivalency. the fact that a game can spread the load across 16 threads does not mean it's equivalent to a fast hexacore at 70% load.

until prices for intel went nuts, AMD had nothing on 8600k, unless you needed 12/16 threads.
Not sure what any of that has to do with anything. Thanks.

Edit: Just to recap, anyone buying a 9900k strictly for gaming is wasting their money but that is their prerogative. Therefore, someone buying a 9900k probably isn't running a 1440 or 1080 hi-refresh. So alas, they are probably running a monitor focused on color reproduction which means it is probably 60-75hz.
Posted on Reply
#74
cucker tarlson
moproblems99Not sure what any of that has to do with anything. Thanks.
go to the wx2990x thread and say openly that most people just video edit on their laptops.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 3rd, 2025 08:42 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts