Tuesday, February 19th 2019
NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti to Perform Roughly On-par with GTX 1070: Leaked Benchmarks
NVIDIA's upcoming "Turing" based GeForce GTX 1660 Ti graphics card could carve itself a value proposition between the $250-300 mark that lets it coexist with both the GTX 1060 6 GB and the $350 RTX 2060, according to leaked "Final Fantasy XV" benchmarks scored by VideoCardz. In these benchmarks, the GTX 1660 Ti was found to perform roughly on par with the previous-generation GTX 1070 (non-Ti), which is plausible given that the 1,536 CUDA cores based on "Turing," architecture, with their higher IPC and higher GPU clocks, are likely to catch up with the 1,920 "Pascal" CUDA cores of the GTX 1070, while 12 Gbps 192-bit GDDR6 serves up more memory bandwidth than 8 Gbps 256-bit GDDR5 (288 GB/s vs. 256 GB/s). The GTX 1070 scores in memory size, with 8 GB of it. NVIDIA is expected to launch the GTX 1660 Ti later this month at USD $279. Unlike the RTX 20-series, these chips lack NVIDIA RTX real-time raytracing technology, and DLSS (deep-learning supersampling).
Sources:
VideoCardz, TUM_APISAK (Twitter)
63 Comments on NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti to Perform Roughly On-par with GTX 1070: Leaked Benchmarks
Top news stories today......
RT is built into Microsofts direct X 12, Lisa Sue said Navi will support some type of RT, which means that the PS5 and Xbox will since they will have Navi gpu's.
Nvidia is working with the top 5 game developers to ensure RT an DLSS is in every AAA game.
lets fact check
AMD will have some sort of RT with Navi their CEO said so, 8 months from now Navi is supposed to release
Navi RT will be in both next gen consoles PS5, xbox 2, in less than 2 years
Nvidia does now
Microsoft has it built into DX 12 , now
Game developers are using it now
im not predicting the future, its common sense.
From the makers of the latest Metro Ex. game.
Quote"
"In terms of the viability of RT on next generation consoles, the hardware doesn't have to be specifically RTX cores. Those cores aren't the only thing that matters when it comes to ray tracing. They are fixed function hardware that speed up the calculations specifically relating to the BVH intersection tests. Those calculations can be done in standard compute if the computer cores are numerous and fast enough (which we believe they will be on the next gen consoles). In fact, any GPU that is running DX12 will be able to "run" DXR since DXR is just an extension of DX12. "
another top news story....
quote
"NVIDIA CEO Says They’re Working with Devs on Every Single Game Coming Out to Add Ray Tracing, Slips Unity Engine Support on the Way"
wccftech.com/unity-engine-might-announce-ray-tracing/
Also, I don't recall AMD saying Navi would have it. Only that they were working on it.
im not gonna google everything for you guys. I watched the video of that interview. they will use RT when it becomes more mainstream.
Next year it will be in a dozen or more games and soon in consoles, is that main stream enough for you?
Late next year we will have 7nm RTX3080ti's with 40% more performance, along with mainstream gpu's with rtx2080 performance.
A gpu that is strong with math can do it , A.K.A. Navi
The vega gpu's have been tested, it runs ok, but not great
again im not googling everything i read again.
but now Nvidia does better
And remember consoles do more with the same PC power.
I apologize for my rant......I need a beer, netflix, and a vacation.
AMD likes its "console"* sales and so do the two huge companies that make them. It likes being able to sell prosumer chips to gamers instead of having to go to the expense of designing custom gaming GPUs (beyond the design for the "consoles").
Nvidia likes its extra-premium pricing.
*(Really low-end PCs in disguise so consumers won't revolt over being force-fed three artificially-segregated "platforms" that should be able to freely share the same binaries.)
AMD's role in the "console" scam is a significant reason why adequate competition is nowhere to be found in the high-quality PC gaming GPU space. The other big problem is that duopolies aren't terrific. People are so conditioned to the thinking that having just AMD and Nvidia compete is what real competition is. It isn't. It's merely better than wholesale monopolization.