Wednesday, June 19th 2019
AMD E3 2019 Tech Day: All Slide Decks (Ryzen 3000 "Zen 2", Radeon RX 5000 "Navi", etc)
This continuously-updating article is a compilation of the 11 (eleven) slide-decks AMD pushed out that cover its upcoming Ryzen 3000 series processor- and Radeon RX 5000-series graphics card launches on July 7, at varying levels of technical insight to target different classes of audiences (consumers, editors, and industry partners such as OEMs and system-integrators). In the first segment, we post the Ryzen Deep Dive presentation targeting DIY consumers and SI (system integrators). Keep checking back on this article, you may find interesting details which we couldn't spot ourselves.The slide-deck continues.
Deck 2 - AMD Matisse MCM Physical Design
This slide-deck is targeted at enthusiasts, engineers, and editors to help understand what's under the IHS of a Ryzen 3000 "Matisse" MCM.Deck 3 - Zen 2 CPU Architecture
Also targeted at enthusiasts and editors, this deck describes the improvements and resulting performance gains of the Zen 2 microarchitecture.Deck 4 - Zen 2 CPU Architecture (lite edition)
This slide deck is a slightly dumbed-down version of the one above, targeted at retail channel distributors, gamers/consumers, and system integrators.Deck 5 - 3rd Gen Ryzen Main Slide Deck
This is the main slide deck for the 3rd gen Ryzen series, detailing its key features and SKUs.Deck 6 - Graphics Architecture UpdateDeck 7 - AMD Radeon RX 5000 SeriesDeck 8 - AMD Radeon RX 5700 seriesDeck 9 - AMD Graphics Architecture Update Deep DiveDeck 10 - Radeon Software Adrenalin 2019 powering RX 5700 seriesDeck 11 - Game DevelopersSlides from the E3 2019 "Next Horizon" Event Keynote Not Found in the Above Decks
Deck 2 - AMD Matisse MCM Physical Design
This slide-deck is targeted at enthusiasts, engineers, and editors to help understand what's under the IHS of a Ryzen 3000 "Matisse" MCM.Deck 3 - Zen 2 CPU Architecture
Also targeted at enthusiasts and editors, this deck describes the improvements and resulting performance gains of the Zen 2 microarchitecture.Deck 4 - Zen 2 CPU Architecture (lite edition)
This slide deck is a slightly dumbed-down version of the one above, targeted at retail channel distributors, gamers/consumers, and system integrators.Deck 5 - 3rd Gen Ryzen Main Slide Deck
This is the main slide deck for the 3rd gen Ryzen series, detailing its key features and SKUs.Deck 6 - Graphics Architecture UpdateDeck 7 - AMD Radeon RX 5000 SeriesDeck 8 - AMD Radeon RX 5700 seriesDeck 9 - AMD Graphics Architecture Update Deep DiveDeck 10 - Radeon Software Adrenalin 2019 powering RX 5700 seriesDeck 11 - Game DevelopersSlides from the E3 2019 "Next Horizon" Event Keynote Not Found in the Above Decks
48 Comments on AMD E3 2019 Tech Day: All Slide Decks (Ryzen 3000 "Zen 2", Radeon RX 5000 "Navi", etc)
www.techpowerup.com/img/dF4sjxFh6HNk7GXn.jpg
I smell a trend here...
www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/share-your-aida-64-cache-and-memory-benchmark-here.186338/page-34#post-4064663
3733 limit is pretty meh either these days.
The cores and their L2/L3 cache are now not directly connected to the IMC, but go through an IF link first, then the internal routing of the "North Bridge" die.
Latency will increase, there's no way around it...
The reason cache size was increased is to compensate for this design quirk.
I'm guessing it works fine... people game on their Threadrippers, and they have the same "issue" of having to jump on IF link to get to memory.
-same core count for skus, r3 is 4c/8t,r5 is 6c/12t,r7 is 8c/16t.seems like the main point of this design was to introduce 12c for mainstream boards
-boost frequencies around 300mhz higher than 12nm
-same or worse latency
-higher cache size
-memory limitations pushed a bit higher
-higher price both for skus and for the boards
Half the chip(let) size may 5 times lower production cost. Weird huh ? It's because the unavoidable defects in the silicon... and the smaller you get, the higher chance that you end up with a perfectly working chip.
So AMD can produce these cheaper than with a monolithic design and have more profit, which they seriously need...
The fact that it has some performance benefit is just a +
Oh, and they can shove more cores in due to that significant production cost reduction...
I'm guessing it's literally cheaper for them to make 1x 16-core 3950X than it was to make 1x 8-core 1800X, but they are selling it with 50% higher launch price.
And still, for the consumers, the price per core is lower. Magic !
btw .. thats a lottttttttt of SLIDES!!!!!!!!!!!
www.techspot.com/guides/1676-qr-code-explained/
yeah using a 2015 CPU with a 2016 GPU versus the 3700x and Navi is downright deceiving. Who are they kidding... Zen 2 is virtually Skylake 2.0 LMAO pathetic marketeers. Pair that outdated 6700k with 5700XT and it'll deliver the same FPS.
anyway,I think doubling the cache and the freqency increase will more than make up for that. lol,this is rich.
3700x is faster than 6700k and 1070 when using a 2070 equivalent,that is surprising.
also,the avg. shows 24% over gtx 1070 for 5700xt while tpu has 2070 38% faster than 1070.40% is best case scenario here,more often you see 1070Ti-2060 performance.