Tuesday, November 5th 2019
New Date for AMD's Announcement of 3rd Gen Ryzen Threadripper - November 7th
It's sort of a goalpost-moving world, but according to Videocardz, AMD has apparently scrapped plans to announce their new Ryzen Threadripper lineup for today, November 5th, and has since scheduled the announcement for November 7th. The website cites sources close to AMD's plans as a way to add credence to their report. This writer, for one, thinks an announcement on a day other than a 7th would be a missed opportunity, flavor-wise, considering the 7 nm manufacturing process of the new AMD HEDT lineup, but I digress.
As far as is known, all other plans are kept, including the announcement of three new processors: the Threadripper 3960X and 3970X, which will hit shelves come November 19th, when the review embargo lifts; and the Threadripper 3990X, which will only be available come January 2020. The new TRX40 platform and motherboards based on the design will also be showcased, and there should be a myriad of new product announcements on that front to accompany AMD's new products.
Source:
Videocardz
As far as is known, all other plans are kept, including the announcement of three new processors: the Threadripper 3960X and 3970X, which will hit shelves come November 19th, when the review embargo lifts; and the Threadripper 3990X, which will only be available come January 2020. The new TRX40 platform and motherboards based on the design will also be showcased, and there should be a myriad of new product announcements on that front to accompany AMD's new products.
33 Comments on New Date for AMD's Announcement of 3rd Gen Ryzen Threadripper - November 7th
I can see swifty trying to put this in a server rack with 2 titans again and somewhat failing. But he's an extreme example.
Regarding Nov 7th - what i can tell is that more details will be known, for a further date release, about all sorts of stuff. Worth the wait.
The graph shown is only part of the equation: the other part is required to make a proper judgement.
Intel can work well but apparently you have to do some stuff before that happens.
With Nvenc, I mean sure I guess, idk the exact quality restrictions or performance hit of that.
If you use Nvenc and stream at the highest quality (which idk what that is even equal to in x264) at 1080p 60fps, what performance hit would you get? Well... I mean... what do you want then? AMD to spend tons of cash to force people to do things their way? pretty sure that would not be to your liking either.
Plenty of tech in the past relied on people adopting it, I dont really blame the tech if that does not happen.
PS3's very different cpu.
AMD Mantle (now Vulcan)
Nvidia Gsync
Lucid Hydra
etc etc etc, I welcome innovation and as a company you can only do so much to get it to stick without becoming a complete dictator.
Nv puts money and people on NVENC. AMD has like 2 guys sitting there twiddling their thumbs. And ya wonder why NVENC has great support and AMD, has jack for support. Radeon VII, it's a freaking great powerhaus compute card but has zero purpose... because nothing really supports its capabilities. Ridiculous! Stop making excuses for them, this is why they shit support in major apps for their cards.
The fact the benchmark doesn't try AMF...is sad. Also that they limited themselves to slow. I mean, anyone that doesn't care about quality should use NVENC/AMF. Anyone that does care about quality is going to use CPU veryslow.
Why are we talking about this anyway? Ryzen 3950X can do 1080p60 veryslow on a single CPU. Threadripper is beyond that. Not many people even have 60 mbps upload to do 4K60. I don't even know what services permit 4K streaming. Even so, it might be more than Threadripper required to do 4K...could be Epyc territory. I think Epyc runs into NUMA domain problems though...
..Unless they physically use one keyboard, one mouse, one monitor for each and every account
If not, its basicly 3rd party automation programs.
/rant