Wednesday, April 1st 2020

Intel Planning 14nm "Ozark Lake" 16-core Processor for Spring 2021

TechPowerUp has learned that Intel is planning to bring 16 cores onto the mainstream desktop platform by Spring 2021 by implementing a similar chip-design philosophy as AMD: MCMs. The new "Ozark Lake" processor will pack up to 16 cores and 32 threads by decoupling the "core" and "uncore" components of a typical Intel mainstream processor.

Intel will leverage the additional fiberglass substrate floor-space yielded from the new LGA1700 package to create a multi-chip module that has two [kinds of] dies, the "core complex" and the "uncore complex." The core complex is a 14 nm die purely composed of CPU cores and an EMIB interconnect. There will be as many as 16 "Skylake" cores in a conventional ringbus layout, and conventional cache hierarchy (256 KB L2$ and up to 2 MB/core L3$). The lack of uncore components and exclusive clock and voltage domains will allow the CPU cores to attain Thermal Velocity Boost Pro speeds of up to 6.00 GHz, if not more.
The core complex connects to another, smaller die on the package called the "uncore complex," using EMIB. This die packs all of the chip's I/O. Among its key components include a dual-channel DDR4 memory controller, a PCI-Express gen 4.0 root complex with 28 lanes (16 toward PEG, 8 toward the DMI 4.0 chipset bus, and 4 toward an "accelerated M.2 slot" (working title), or perhaps even an Optane persistent memory slot). Also featured will be an Intel Xe-architecture based iGPU with roughly 1 TFLOP/s raw compute power. The modularity of the MCM will allow Intel to build lower-core count SKUs by simply placing smaller 10-core, 8-core, or 6-core dies next to the uncore complex.

Intel has, in the past, built an MCM with the exact same floor-plan and division of labor, "Clarkdale," circa 2010. Our well placed sources in the motherboard industry pin a soft-launch date on April 1, 2021, unless delayed by COVID-19.

Update 07:07 UTC: We reached out to Intel for comments and received an unexpected response: "We do not comment on unreleased products, but we're committed to saving the world by keeping college kids away from irresponsible spring break parties during a pandemic."
Add your own comment

60 Comments on Intel Planning 14nm "Ozark Lake" 16-core Processor for Spring 2021

#26
Houd.ini
Love the name, Ozark Lake:roll:
Posted on Reply
#28
Tomgang
theoneandonlymrk16 cores, is that all:p
But you are forgetting one thing and that is it is 16 fake cores. As you know, that makes each core 3 times as fast as a real core:p
Posted on Reply
#29
Metroid
This must be the behemoth edition that comes with a nuclear material, but take notice, just like a nuclear generator, you can't turn it off. This is likely to be only for a hydro cooling solution, reason why they called "ozark lake" means you will also need a source of water as large as a lake to cool this behemoth.
Posted on Reply
#30
skaldic
Best in Class, hope it's available by 1st of April 2021
Posted on Reply
#32
ppn
at this rate it may turn out to be true.
Posted on Reply
#33
Emanulele
Is it bankrolled with cartel money? lol
Posted on Reply
#34
Space Lynx
Astronaut
ppnat this rate it may turn out to be true.
won't matter. AMD will have 5nm out in summer 2021. should easily beat this or match it at cheaper cost.
Posted on Reply
#35
AnarchoPrimitiv
Isn't AMD supposed to be on an extremely advanced and refined 7nm node by 2021? And Intel will be on 14nm....even if it can go 6ghz, I seriously do not think that it'll compensate for the disadvantages of 14nm vs 7nmLPP+ (or whatever it'll be) . I would imagine that by zen3 (which will have already released by spring 2021, AMD will have lifted their ipc substantially more and I think it'd be safe to guess that , they'll be hitting top frequencies reaching 4.8/4.9ghz (the 3950X hits boosts of 4.7 and its been estimated that the more advanced 7nm node AMD will be using will add 200-300mhz more... Zen1 was about 4.1, my 2700x hits 4.39 at 1.3175v, and zen2 is at least slightly better than that so with a "revolutionary" new architecture and a more advanced process node, I do not think 200-300mhz more is crazy. The upcoming zen3 has been hinted at a greater ipc uplift than zen 2 vs zen+, as AMD themselves have said that zen2, was "evolutionary" while zen2 will be "revolutionary",... And those are the two exact words they used. So if zen2 was 15%-20% ipc lift, then zen3 could be realistically 20%-30% (obviously figures approaching 30% are probably less likely but I won't rule them out) , and AMD has been making pretty good on their claims since zen was released.

I have to wonder how much heat and power a 14nm cpu core.....

Wait, this is an April's Fool joke isn't it?
Posted on Reply
#36
chodaboy19
OMFG, you got me so good!!! LOLLLL :roll:
Posted on Reply
#37
cyrand
I got a source these chips will especially be optimize for financial planners specializing in money laundering.
Posted on Reply
#38
Space Lynx
Astronaut
AnarchoPrimitivIsn't AMD supposed to be on an extremely advanced and refined 7nm node by 2021? And Intel will be on 14nm....even if it can go 6ghz, I seriously do not think that it'll compensate for the disadvantages of 14nm vs 7nmLPP+ (or whatever it'll be) . I would imagine that by zen3 (which will have already released by spring 2021, AMD will have lifted their ipc substantially more and I think it'd be safe to guess that , they'll be hitting top frequencies reaching 4.8/4.9ghz (the 3950X hits boosts of 4.7 and its been estimated that the more advanced 7nm node AMD will be using will add 200-300mhz more... Zen1 was about 4.1, my 2700x hits 4.39 at 1.3175v, and zen2 is at least slightly better than that so with a "revolutionary" new architecture and a more advanced process node, I do not think 200-300mhz more is crazy. The upcoming zen3 has been hinted at a greater ipc uplift than zen 2 vs zen+, as AMD themselves have said that zen2, was "evolutionary" while zen2 will be "revolutionary",... And those are the two exact words they used. So if zen2 was 15%-20% ipc lift, then zen3 could be realistically 20%-30% (obviously figures approaching 30% are probably less likely but I won't rule them out) , and AMD has been making pretty good on their claims since zen was released.

I have to wonder how much heat and power a 14nm cpu core.....

Wait, this is an April's Fool joke isn't it?
no 5nm is on target for 2021. in fact TSMC is already making 5nm chips for phones last I read a couple weeks ago.
Posted on Reply
#39
InhaleOblivion
The Ozark on Netflix Season 3 just started about a week ago. While that would be an epic name for the chipset. That codename and the rumored specs as mentioned by other members give this one away. Happy April Fools. :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#40
MrAMD
AMD won't stand a chance against this. Zen4 DOA.
Posted on Reply
#41
Freebird
TomgangWow 16 cores, more than 6 ghz core clock and 14 NM. What a nice cpu very fast while keeping me warm and comfy in the winter.

There is just one little problem, the day we have today. So yeah I declare this for:
Yeah, but unfortunately for Intel, this one isn't fake newz.
XMG APEX 15 is a Laptop with AMD Ryzen 3950X CPU Inside
Posted on Reply
#42
ARF
AnarchoPrimitivAMD themselves have said that zen2, was "evolutionary" while zen2 will be "revolutionary",... And those are the two exact words they used. So if zen2 was 15%-20% ipc lift, then zen3 could be realistically 20%-30% (obviously figures approaching 30% are probably less likely but I won't rule them out) , and AMD has been making pretty good on their claims since zen was released.
Zen 3 Vermeer on the same node.
Zen 4 2021 or 2022 on next-gen node.

We don't know the codenames after Vermeer and Renoir.
Just Genoa after Naples, Milan and Rome.



Posted on Reply
#43
Space Lynx
Astronaut
AMD got that red lipstick on, just teasing bro, Intel got that blue pill, ready to go

new young boi's rockin tha scene on low node
Posted on Reply
#44
Tomgang
FreebirdYeah, but unfortunately for Intel, this one isn't fake newz.
XMG APEX 15 is a Laptop with AMD Ryzen 3950X CPU Inside
I have seen it. Quite impressive with 16 cores in a laptop al throw its not a thin laptop. But still, it is a good idea I think.

And I know it is not fake new as this laptop whas already posted on March 31st.
Posted on Reply
#45
Dave65
GREAT, A NEW ARCHITECTURE............... Oh wait:shadedshu:
Posted on Reply
#46
ARF
Dave65GREAT, A NEW ARCHITECTURE............... Oh wait:shadedshu:
If I am not mistaken, Alder Lake was supposed to be a brand new architecture, cutting the ties with legacy instructions, thus making use of the freed space for higher IPC.
I see it will be BIG.small hybrid. And may be not end of legacy x86 instructions, just adding new.
Posted on Reply
#47
Caring1
InhaleOblivionThe Ozark on Netflix Season 3 just started about a week ago. While that would be an epic name for the chipset. That codename and the rumored specs as mentioned by other members give this one away. Happy April Fools. :laugh:
That might mean something to Americans. :shadedshu:
Posted on Reply
#48
mtcn77
One thing I have noted about Intel is they have fantastic products, but bad execution.
As a foundry business, EMIB is the killer tech, yet they have absolutely 0 products.
Same for ESRAM, what it could be, what it were...
I think, Intel works best when it follows a standard some other company made. It is the perfect engineering company with zero resourcefulness.
So, when they say 6.0GHz, I absolutely believe them to deliver. They made great rounds with powergated frontend in the sandybridge era. They just need to work like that.
Posted on Reply
#49
ARF
mtcn77One thing I have noted about Intel is they have fantastic products, but bad execution.
CISC x86 is not that good, trust me :)
Posted on Reply
#50
mtcn77
ARFCISC x86 is not that good, trust me :)
No no, they have this duke university alumni foundry chief which I keep out of this.
I only say this as a design perspective - they needed that Jim Keller sorely.
EMIB and all, so very good. They don't shuffle their core market, that is what I'm saying.
That fountry executive which I watched his 2012 lecture told it straight away, the 14nm process had all the bells and whistles and implied how else to improve upon in 10 nm - we are only beginning to see it now. It was just an emphasis on 14nm's readiness. Intel only lacked design, they really have the best tech, see my note on their EMIB which could dominate 2.5D domain if they wanted to.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jul 16th, 2024 00:22 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts