Sunday, April 19th 2020

TSMC 3nm Process Packs 250 Million Transistors Per Square Millimeter

Imagine being able to shrink a Pentium 4 processor die to the size of a pin-head (if you can figure out how to place 478 bumps on it). TSMC revealed that its future 3 nanometer silicon fabrication node has a development target of 250 million transistors per mm². Called N3, the next-generation silicon fabrication node succeeds TSMC's N5 family of 5 nm-class nodes (that's N5 and any possible refinements).

TSMC CEO CC Wei confirmed that development of the 3 nm node is on-track, with risk production scheduled for 2021 and volume production commencing in the second half of 2022. Perhaps the most startling revelation is that TSMC has decided to stick with FinFETs for N3 owing to the maturity of the technology. Experts are of the opinion that sub-5 nm nodes will require major innovations with materials and structures. TSMC claims that N3 will provide a 10-15% speed improvement at iso-power or 25-30% power reduction at iso-speed, compared to N5.
Source: WikiChip Fuse
Add your own comment

32 Comments on TSMC 3nm Process Packs 250 Million Transistors Per Square Millimeter

#26
XiGMAKiD
londisteIntel's has 5nm in 2023.
Did you mean: Intel's has 5nm in 2033
Posted on Reply
#27
Imouto
londisteThis is TSMC's roadmap. Intel's has 5nm in 2023.
Not quite running away.
Intel's roadmap is a work of fiction. Names, characters, businesses, places, events and incidents are either the products of the author's imagination or used in a fictitious manner. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, or actual events is purely coincidental.
Posted on Reply
#28
pjl321
I am not trying to be an Intel fanboy but if you do look at the number of EUV layers, the pitch size, gate size etc then a chip made on Intel's 7nm and then the same chip made on TSMC's N5P would be within silicon lottery of each other. Don't get me wrong, TSMC is well ahead of Intel as 5nm is being mass produced right now and Intel isn't close to this on their 7nm so TSMC and therefore AMD still has the edge and if TSMC can move to 3nm smoothly around the same time as Intel gets 7nm in full swing that would be very impressive but I have heard there are a few things going wrong with 3nm and hurdles to still clear.
Posted on Reply
#29
midnightoil
pjl321I am not trying to be an Intel fanboy but if you do look at the number of EUV layers, the pitch size, gate size etc then a chip made on Intel's 7nm and then the same chip made on TSMC's N5P would be within silicon lottery of each other. Don't get me wrong, TSMC is well ahead of Intel as 5nm is being mass produced right now and Intel isn't close to this on their 7nm so TSMC and therefore AMD still has the edge and if TSMC can move to 3nm smoothly around the same time as Intel gets 7nm in full swing that would be very impressive but I have heard there are a few things going wrong with 3nm and hurdles to still clear.
Remember, Intel's 10nm looked good on paper too ... and it's the worst node in living memory.
Posted on Reply
#30
ppn
But we know that it won't have that density for Gpus at all. N3P is 100Mtr at best. N5P 60 Mtr, considering N7P is barely 40.
Posted on Reply
#31
$ReaPeR$
EmuIntel held on to their market lead during the Pentium 4 era using shady techniques like giving steep discounts to OEMs who only shipped products with Intel CPUs (if a OEM shipped products with other CPUs then they would be forced to pay retail prices for Intel CPUs). Intel is still filing appeals on the court case that they lost about this.
I know. They are doing the same thing now. And AMD or any other company for that matter would do the same if they were in the same position. It's basic rules of maintaining market dominance.
Posted on Reply
#32
mtcn77
@btarunr please, a TMSC vs. Samsung special. Samsung says Gaafet>Finfet characteristics.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 12:06 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts