Monday, May 24th 2021

Seagate Announces Seagate Mach.2 Exos 2X14 HDD With Up to 524 MB/s Sequential Speeds

Seagate has announced what currently amounts to the fasted HDD storage available in the market. The Seagate Mach.2 Exos 2X14 is available in a 14 TB capacity. What Seagate has, smartly, done, is integrate a dual 7 TB HDD system within a helium-filled 3.5" chassis. The drive features a standard 7200 RPM spindle speed, offers 256 MB cache, and uses a single-port SAS 12 Gb/s interface.The Exos 2X14 should be recognized by systems as two independently addressable logical drives.

Seagate's Exos 2X14 boasts a 524 MB/s sustained transfer rate (outer diameter) of 304/384 random read/write IOPS, and a 4.16 ms average latency - but of course, being an HDD solution with spinning platters and actuators, random performance still suffers tremendously against even its SATA SSD counterparts. Power consumption has understandable gone up for this solution - an Exos 2X14 drive consumes 7.2 W in idle mode and up to 13.5 W under heavy load. Seagate is offering its PowerBalance features integrated into the Exos 2X14, which aims to reduce its power consumption within the 12 W power envelope usually associated with 3.5" HDDs, but Seagate says this "does come with a performance reduction of 50% for sequential reads and 5%-10% for random reads." The need for higher IOPS-per-TB performance in their HDD space so as to allow datacenters to offer adequate performance for high-capacity storage continues to bear fruits.
Source: Tom's Hardware
Add your own comment

37 Comments on Seagate Announces Seagate Mach.2 Exos 2X14 HDD With Up to 524 MB/s Sequential Speeds

#26
claes
That’s why SAS succeeded SATA in enterprise, which is what this disk uses :)
Posted on Reply
#27
dragontamer5788
TumbleGeorgeSata III soon will be death not only for enterprise but also for ordinary consumers. There is no point to keep this very ancient tech alive.
SATA III is 6Gbps, which should support 600MBps transfer speeds (10/8 encoding IIRC: 10 bits to represent 8 bits, so 6000 megabits == 600 Megabytes). We need to see faster disks before SATA III is technically obsolete. SAS is 12Gbps.
Posted on Reply
#28
TumbleGeorge
dragontamer5788SATA III is 6Gbps, which should support 600MBps transfer speeds (10/8 encoding IIRC: 10 bits to represent 8 bits, so 6000 megabits == 600 Megabytes). We need to see faster disks before SATA III is technically obsolete. SAS is 12Gbps.
This is theoretical maximum of transfer speed not practical. Yes will see faster HDDs soon.
Posted on Reply
#29
bencrutz
dragontamer5788SATA III is 6Gbps, which should support 600MBps transfer speeds (10/8 encoding IIRC: 10 bits to represent 8 bits, so 6000 megabits == 600 Megabytes). We need to see faster disks before SATA III is technically obsolete. SAS is 12Gbps.
SAS 4 is almost double that, 22 something Gbps
Posted on Reply
#30
PilleniusMC
Caring1Math fail in the name, they should be 2X7 HDD. :laugh:
It is part of the X14 series, and has 2 actuators, so 2X14
Posted on Reply
#31
kayjay010101
PilleniusMCIt is part of the X14 series, and has 2 actuators, so 2X14
Correct, but it's still misleading. 2X14 means "2 times 14" to most people; especially seeing as it's advertised as a 14TB drive, so it could easily be misinterpreted as a 28TB drive that's made up of 2x 14TB logical volumes.
Posted on Reply
#32
TumbleGeorge
kayjay010101Correct, but it's still misleading. 2X14 means "2 times 14" to most people; especially seeing as it's advertised as a 14TB drive, so it could easily be misinterpreted as a 28TB drive that's made up of 2x 14TB logical volumes.
Seagate must be got fines because of fake designation.
Posted on Reply
#33
bonehead123
HDD ? Spinning rust ? whahdembe, hahahahahahahahaha :roll:
Posted on Reply
#34
PilleniusMC
kayjay010101Correct, but it's still misleading. 2X14 means "2 times 14" to most people; especially seeing as it's advertised as a 14TB drive, so it could easily be misinterpreted as a 28TB drive that's made up of 2x 14TB logical volumes.
Exos X18 is up to 18 TB, but also has 16, 14, and 12 TB, Exos X16 is up to 16 TB, but also has 14 and 12 TB. Exos 2X14 is up to 14 TB total capacity, so it fits with their lineup... the X is just the series designator, you also have the E series, there it is even more confusing.
Posted on Reply
#35
Jism
mechtechhmmm

So my old 256GB plextor M3s ssd I gave a buddy is still running strong as a primary drive, almost 10 years old.

www.storagereview.com/review/plextor-px-m3s-ssd-review

When todays' generation hdds can do that call me.
I have like samsung drives here of each 320GB each that was high-end at some point, and they still work without problems. One of 'm makes a nasty click upon powering 'm on. But thats about it.

I lost trust in seagate as a brand in total; their faillure rate is so high and knowing i lost good data of myself once as well, i woud'nt want to bet on it. I used todo data recovery, most brands where obviously seagate followed with WD.
Posted on Reply
#36
MxPhenom 216
ASIC Engineer
JismI have like samsung drives here of each 320GB each that was high-end at some point, and they still work without problems. One of 'm makes a nasty click upon powering 'm on. But thats about it.

I lost trust in seagate as a brand in total; their faillure rate is so high and knowing i lost good data of myself once as well, i woud'nt want to bet on it. I used todo data recovery, most brands where obviously seagate followed with WD.
Failure rate for major brands of hard drives isnt that bad anymore. There was period where failure rates were bad for the top players, but that was 10-12 years ago.

As much as people want to say platter drives are dinosaur tech, there is still plenty of stuff happening to make them better and there's things brought up all the time of how to advance them further. Solid state is just not there on the capacity side of things for datacenters, cloud, etc. that makes up a massive majority of WD and Seagate shipping volume.
Posted on Reply
#37
mechtech
JismI have like samsung drives here of each 320GB each that was high-end at some point, and they still work without problems. One of 'm makes a nasty click upon powering 'm on. But thats about it.

I lost trust in seagate as a brand in total; their faillure rate is so high and knowing i lost good data of myself once as well, i woud'nt want to bet on it. I used todo data recovery, most brands where obviously seagate followed with WD.
I have old drives that still work also. When I said recent I meant within the last 5-6 years. The quality really dropped for a bit after the floods in Thailand however many years ago. But yes HDDs do seem to be coming around still lots of reviews with failures though.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 3rd, 2025 03:57 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts