Tuesday, September 14th 2021

Possible Intel 12th Gen Core US Retail Pricing Leaked

US electronics retailer Provantage allegedly leaked the retail pricing of the upcoming Intel 12th Gen Core "Alder Lake-S" desktop processors. The list confirms that the company will only be debuting the unlocked "K" and "KF" SKUs in 2021, with locked 65 W SKUs joining in only in 2022. Pricing was put out for both boxed, as well are tray (per-piece) prices. The lineup begins with the Core i5-12600KF boxed processor at $261.77, a 6+4 core (P+E), 16-thread processor with 20 MB of L3 cache, and 4.90 GHz maximum boost frequency for the P cores. As a "KF" SKU, it lacks an iGPU. The i5-12600K, which has the same specs and an iGPU on top, is priced at $295.49.

The Core i7-12700KF and i7-12700K are 8+4 core (P+E), 20-thread chips with 25 MB of cache, and 5.00 GHz boost frequency. The two are differentiated by iGPU. The i7-12700KF is priced at $395.61, and the i7-12700K at $422.17. Leading the pack, are the Core i9-12900K and i9-12900KF, which max out the silicon, with 8+8 (P+E) core, 24-thread, and 30 MB of cache. These boost up to 5.20 GHz, but we've heard rumors of the Thermal Velocity Boost feature driving frequencies beyond this. The i9-12900KF is priced at $578.13, while the i9-12900K goes for $604.99. Tray pricing of these chips is more or less similar, with price difference being under $5. The boxed SKUs don't include a cooler, so from a bill-of-materials standpoint, this price difference only accounts for the paperboard box. Intel is expected to formally launch these chips in late-October (which is probably when reviews go live), with retail availability in mid-November.
Source: HotHardware
Add your own comment

36 Comments on Possible Intel 12th Gen Core US Retail Pricing Leaked

#26
Voluman
MetroidCore i9-12900K = So P+E means 8 performance big cores = single thread + 8 efficient little hyperthreading cores for multithreading, so P = 8 + E = (8+8(hyperthreading)) = 24 threads?

Aside from that, I wonder about that 125w, past 125w figures from intel have been more like 500 watts real.
That 125W and the others mentions are PL1!
PL2 is around 2-2,5x more.
Posted on Reply
#27
sebapolver
MetroidCore i9-12900K = So P+E means 8 performance big cores = single thread + 8 efficient little hyperthreading cores for multithreading, so P = 8 + E = (8+8(hyperthreading)) = 24 threads?

Aside from that, I wonder about that 125w, past 125w figures from intel have been more like 500 watts real.
Actually, the performance cores are the ones that have hyperthreading. Look at the number of threads in the 12600K/KF or 12700K/kF.
Posted on Reply
#28
r9
neatfeatguyIf it only takes Intel about a year to play catchup with AMD, maybe it was good that AMD gave them a good swift kick in the ass to remind that to innovate and not just regurgitate.
How do you think AMD lost the dominance they had with athlon and atholon64 ?
How do you think Voodoo seized to exist ?

Intel or AMD fanboy competition is a good thing.
Can't wait for Intel to join the GPU wars as AMD and Nvidia are enjoying this "shortage" way too much.
Posted on Reply
#31
Melvis
RichardsOn videocardz site
Erm.....did you look at the charts? I dont see the 12600k destroying the 5800x at all. :kookoo:
Posted on Reply
#32
N3M3515
MelvisErm.....did you look at the charts? I dont see the 12600k destroying the 5800x at all. :kookoo:
It was 20% at single threaded and 0% at multithreaded. Where i saw a big diff in multithreaded was 12600k vs 5600x (12600K beating it)
Posted on Reply
#33
Melvis
N3M3515It was 20% at single threaded and 0% at multithreaded. Where i saw a big diff in multithreaded was 12600k vs 5600x (12600K beating it)
Did you see that the 12600K is a 10 Core 16Thread CPU?........and did you also notice that the single core Performance is way way off, the offical site for single core CPU performance against the 11900K and the 5950X puts the 5950X ahead, and yet it isnt in this test/graph

I will wait for trusted proper reviews as this one is already way off.....
Posted on Reply
#34
arni-gx
Erazor6000So far we have:
~ $280 for i5 12600K
~ $400 for i7 12700K
~ $600 for i9 12900K

Which is not that different from 10th gen. which on release were priced:
~ $265 for i5 10600K
~ $400 for i7 10700K
~ $500 for i9 10900K

Since i9 12900K is (should be) faster than R9 5900X, then $600 seems a reasonable price. After all, it is i9.
hmm, still there is no price info for i9 12900 non k and i7 12700 non k..... with real new HSF by intel......
Posted on Reply
#35
N3M3515
MelvisI will wait for trusted proper reviews as this one is already way off.....
I do agree with that, and also the graphs start at 1200 instead of 0, so people who don't look at the numbers think it is an ass kicking when it's not.
Posted on Reply
#36
R0H1T
N3M3515the graphs start at 1200 instead of 0,
Clickbait :shadedshu:
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Aug 29th, 2024 19:00 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts