Tuesday, March 15th 2022

AMD Spring 2022 Ryzen Desktop Processor Update Includes Six New Models Besides 5800X3D

In addition to the Ryzen 7 5800X3D, which AMD claims to be the world's fastest gaming processor, AMD gave its desktop processor product-stack a major update, with as many as six other processor models spanning a wide range of price-points that help the company better compete with the bulk of the 12th Gen Core "Alder Lake" processor lineup. The new lineup sees the introduction of the Ryzen 7 5700X (not to be confused with the Ryzen 7 5700G). The 5700X is based on the same "Vermeer" multi-chip module (MCM) as the Ryzen 7 5800X, unlike the 5700G, which is a desktop APU based on the "Cezanne" monolithic silicon. Both "Vermeer" and "Cezanne" are based on the "Zen 3" microarchitecture.

The Ryzen 7 5700X is an 8-core/16-thread processor clocked at 3.40 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost, compared to the 3.80 GHz base and 4.80 GHz boost frequency of the 5800X. Another key difference is its 65 W TDP, compared to 105 W of the 5800X, which could differentiate its boosting behavior and overclocking headroom compared to the 5800X. AMD is pricing the 5700X at USD $299 (MSRP), making it a competitor to the Intel Core i5-12600KF. Interestingly, the retail PIB (processor-in-box) package of the 5700X does not include a stock cooler despite its 65 W TDP. A 95 W-capable Wraith Spire wouldn't have hurt.
Next up, we have the Ryzen 5 5600 6-core/12-thread processor. This chip is the spiritual successor to the popular Ryzen 5 3600, despite AMD according that title to the 5600G APU. The 5600 is based on the same "Vermeer" MCM as the 5600X, and tones down on clock speeds. It runs at 3.50 GHz, with 4.40 GHz boost, compared to the 3.70/4.60 GHz clocks of the 5600X. The TDP is the same as the 5600X, at 65 W, and luckily, a Wraith Stealth cooler comes included. AMD is pricing the Ryzen 5 5600 at $199 (MSRP), pitting it against the likes of the Core i5-12500.

The Ryzen 5 5500 is a very interesting part. This 6-core/12-thread processor is based on the same "Cezanne" monolithic silicon as the Ryzen 5 5600G, but with its iGPU disabled. The "Cezanne" silicon physically features 16 MB of L3 cache that's shared among all CPU cores. The processor ticks at 3.60 GHz base, with 4.20 GHz boost. AMD is pricing the chip at $159, and its main competitor appears to be the Core i5-12400F.

Lastly, AMD launched a trio of Ryzen 4000 desktop processors for the first time in the retail channel. These are based on the 7 nm "Renoir" monolithic silicon, and feature "Zen 2" CPU cores. The lineup begins with the Ryzen 3 4100, a 4-core/8-thread chip at $99, and moves up to the Ryzen 5 4500, a 6-core/12-thread chip at $129. The highlight here is the Ryzen 5 4600G, a fully-fledged APU (including iGPU), with a 6-core/12-thread setup, at $154. Given the much lower IPC of the "Zen 2" cores compared to the "Golden Cove" ones in Core i3 "Alder Lake" series, it's hard to pinpoint what chips these compete with—perhaps leftover 10th Gen Core "Comet Lake" Core i3 and Core i5 inventory.

These processors will be generally available from April 4, 2022, while the 5800X3D comes on April 20.
Add your own comment

80 Comments on AMD Spring 2022 Ryzen Desktop Processor Update Includes Six New Models Besides 5800X3D

#51
Chrispy_
TomgangI all ready have a 5950X and a 5600X in my pc,so I'm good.
I see your problem, you're trying to put two CPUs into one AM4 socket!
Try one CPU per socket ;)
/s
Posted on Reply
#52
wheresmycar
No 4100G quad... or similar?

I have a couple of spare barebone 300 and 400 series amd boards, well not mine but my brothers old office stuff which isn't in use. It would be nice if I could pick up a snappy ~£100 APU for a spare machine in the home.

It would have been nice if I could pick up a used 3200G/2200G for £50'ish. Can't see that happening either.
Posted on Reply
#54
SL2
seth1911The 5500 159$ will be on the Level of the 12100F for 100$ in Games. ;)
The 5500 is the worst one.

There's no -G that tells you that it's a Cezanne, just because it doesn't have graphics. The 4000 may be inferior but at least you kind of get that from the number.

With the 5500 you're stuck with PCIE 3.

Let's go all out 2022 and build teH freshest rig ever together with a brand new Radeon 6500XT and BOOM you're stuck with PCIE 3.0 x4.

Did I mention it was all brand new from 2022? :shadedshu:
Posted on Reply
#55
seth1911
Yeah please @W1zzard make a Test with an AMD midprice PC like a 5500 + 6500XT :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#56
SL2
seth1911Yeah please @W1zzard make a Test with an AMD midprice PC like a 5500 + 6500XT :laugh:
I expect that a certain hairy guy on youtube will do it.. and then just slaughter the 5500 with the cheaper 12100F.
Posted on Reply
#57
seth1911
Hell no im not such of a sub human, i think 5500 + 6500XT got beaten by a Pentium 7400 + 6500XT :laugh:

The celeron is useless with 2 cores / 2 threads, but the Pentium G7400 with HT will be a good counterpart with the 6500XT:fear:


Im sure in the future ull see the OEM Gaming PC with Amd Ryzen 5500, 16GB RAM and 6500XT :p
Posted on Reply
#58
trsttte
ValantarThese look pretty good! Great to see competition returning to the low end CPU market - and of course kudos to Intel for putting pressure on AMD to compete here as well. Kind of weird to bring the 4600G to retail at this point, but ... yay? At least it's an excellent budget-ish APU - my 4650G is very snappy.
The 4500 and 4100 are the weirder ones to me - not only they don't have the iGP enabled, Renoir was also limited to 8x lanes, shouldn't really matter for anything were this chips will be used but a bit of a though sell when even a 12100F can enjoy full pcie 5.0. I guess beggars can't be choosers, though the anemic cache on this old ryzen chips and good single thread performance on Intel might still make them a tough sell regardless or the more cores/threads
TheLostSwedeI think I'm going to have to snag the 5700X, as the 5800X3D is too pricey, unless it's really something in games.
I'm also very undecided, I'd like to go for the 5700G but the pricing is still a bit nuts, the 5700x is looking to undercut it which is nice but I'd like to have the iGPU this time around. There's also AM5 coming soon™ but that would mean throwing away my board and ram
Posted on Reply
#59
TheLostSwede
News Editor
trsttteI'm also very undecided, I'd like to go for the 5700G but the pricing is still a bit nuts, the 5700x is looking to undercut it which is nice but I'd like to have the iGPU this time around. There's also AM5 coming soon™ but that would mean throwing away my board and ram
Went with a 5800X, as the price dropped to the equivalent of the MSRP of the 5700X plus the local VAT here. It was a no brainer in this case.
Don't have the funds to swap out everything and on top of that, I'm going to skip the next first gen platform from AMD.
Posted on Reply
#60
Valantar
trsttteThe 4500 and 4100 are the weirder ones to me - not only they don't have the iGP enabled, Renoir was also limited to 8x lanes, shouldn't really matter for anything were this chips will be used but a bit of a though sell when even a 12100F can enjoy full pcie 5.0. I guess beggars can't be choosers, though the anemic cache on this old ryzen chips and good single thread performance on Intel might still make them a tough sell regardless or the more cores/threads
Hm, I'm reasonably sure Renoir has 16 PEG lanes - IIRC it was only Picasso that had 8 PEG lanes. Though I may be mixing things up here. Still, I agree that those SKUs make the least sense - if nothing else, letting them have a barebones 3CU iGPU would have made them a more attractive proposition. Though I guess part of the point is to harvest Renoir dice with entirely defective iGPUs, given the specs.

Edit: nope, specs confirm 24/20 lanes of PCIe, i.e. the conventional x16 PEG + x4 m.2 + x4 chipset layout for the Ryzen 3 4100 (and the 4600G too).
Posted on Reply
#61
chrcoluk
ValantarHm, I'm reasonably sure Renoir has 16 PEG lanes - IIRC it was only Picasso that had 8 PEG lanes. Though I may be mixing things up here. Still, I agree that those SKUs make the least sense - if nothing else, letting them have a barebones 3CU iGPU would have made them a more attractive proposition. Though I guess part of the point is to harvest Renoir dice with entirely defective iGPUs, given the specs.

Edit: nope, specs confirm 24/20 lanes of PCIe, i.e. the conventional x16 PEG + x4 m.2 + x4 chipset layout for the Ryzen 3 4100 (and the 4600G too).
It does, the 5600G I believe uses Renoir for its i/o, and my 5600G has the 16+4+4 combination for lanes 3.0.

It also shows up as Renoir in Linux for the lanes.
A little warning though, it seems on the G chips AMD segmented off some of the features to a PRO line, (I think OEM only), the 4x4x4x4x mode isnt available in bios (whatever that does) and no ACS either, However ASRock found a way to get the ACS level grouping back without ACS on my bios.

www.amd.com/en/products/apu/amd-ryzen-5-pro-5650g
Posted on Reply
#62
Valantar
chrcolukIt does, the 5600G I believe uses Renoir for its i/o, and my 5600G has the 16+4+4 combination for lanes 3.0.

It also shows up as Renoir in Linux for the lanes.
Interesting! They probably just copy+pasted that portion of the design over, just replacing the cores, cache and rearranging things to fit.
Posted on Reply
#63
trsttte
ValantarHm, I'm reasonably sure Renoir has 16 PEG lanes - IIRC it was only Picasso that had 8 PEG lanes. Though I may be mixing things up here. Still, I agree that those SKUs make the least sense - if nothing else, letting them have a barebones 3CU iGPU would have made them a more attractive proposition. Though I guess part of the point is to harvest Renoir dice with entirely defective iGPUs, given the specs.

Edit: nope, specs confirm 24/20 lanes of PCIe, i.e. the conventional x16 PEG + x4 m.2 + x4 chipset layout for the Ryzen 3 4100 (and the 4600G too).
That's interesting, previously Renoir chips were reported as having only the 12pcie available (8x graphics + 4x m.2 - not counting the 4x from the chipset or the 8x on the iGP) but the die shot indeed reveals 24 available for use

en.wikichip.org/wiki/amd/cores/renoir
www.techpowerup.com/268747/amd-renoir-die-annotation-raises-hopes-of-desktop-chips-featuring-x16-peg

Probably they were mistakenly reported in some places as having only 8x PEG because the chips were more commonly found in laptops dunno
Posted on Reply
#64
5 o'clock Charlie
TheLostSwedeWent with a 5800X, as the price dropped to the equivalent of the MSRP of the 5700X plus the local VAT here. It was a no brainer in this case.
Don't have the funds to swap out everything and on top of that, I'm going to skip the next first gen platform from AMD.
Good to hear you made a decision and have no regrets. For me, I am still going to play the waiting game for the 5800X3D till the end of April. I also saw that the price dropped to a new low where I live as well for the 5800X. Maybe I may end up doing the same as you since I also have no plans on migrating to AM5 immediately. Only time will tell. ;)
Posted on Reply
#65
TheLostSwede
News Editor
5 o'clock CharlieGood to hear you made a decision and have no regrets. For me, I am still going to play the waiting game for the 5800X3D till the end of April. I also saw that the price dropped to a new low where I live as well for the 5800X. Maybe I may end up doing the same as you since I also have no plans on migrating to AM5 immediately. Only time will tell. ;)
Well, I've been fine with my 3800X to be honest, but I'm curious if AMD is about to discontinue the 5800X in favour of the 5700X and 5800X3D.
This rig is going to have to last me a couple of more years, as I have been an "early" adopter twice and it has been quite painful both times, as AMD has launched what I'd call beta platforms both times and it took about six months of UEFI and AGESA updates to make the systems work as intended and I'm not playing that game again, especially with the cost of everything else I would need to get.
Posted on Reply
#66
mechtech
TheLostSwedeI think I'm going to have to snag the 5700X, as the 5800X3D is too pricey, unless it's really something in games.
Even that 5600 looks nice on a budget. Still has the 32MB cache.
Posted on Reply
#67
ThrashZone
TheLostSwedeI think I'm going to have to snag the 5700X, as the 5800X3D is too pricey, unless it's really something in games.
Hi,
450.us doesn't sound to bad to me if it's as good as amd states.

Intel just released a 800.us 12900ks for goodness sake :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#68
5 o'clock Charlie
TheLostSwedeWell, I've been fine with my 3800X to be honest, but I'm curious if AMD is about to discontinue the 5800X in favour of the 5700X and 5800X3D.
This rig is going to have to last me a couple of more years, as I have been an "early" adopter twice and it has been quite painful both times, as AMD has launched what I'd call beta platforms both times and it took about six months of UEFI and AGESA updates to make the systems work as intended and I'm not playing that game again, especially with the cost of everything else I would need to get.
If my memory serves me correctly, I don't think they phased out or discontinued the 3800X from the previous generation that quickly, but I could be wrong. I always saw sale prices of the 3800X when the 5000 series was available. So my assumption is that AMD will still produce 5800X chips as long as they have the yields to warrant them. I came in late to the Ryzen platform (e.g. B550), so I missed all of the drama you mentioned. My previous system was a z77 platform running a 3770k, which one day back in November 2020 decided to no longer complete its POST process because of an overvolted usb port and shuts down. I was unsuccessful to get it to complete the boot process and did not have the time to troubleshoot as my main rig was used for work since I was telecommuting to work. At that time, I was able to get a b550 board and 5600X immediately, which has been very good to me and fit my budget at the time. I guess I just want to get the most out of my AM4 system now rather than later when AM5 is released. At that point it may be harder get upgrade parts.
Posted on Reply
#69
TheLostSwede
News Editor
5 o'clock CharlieIf my memory serves me correctly, I don't think they phased out or discontinued the 3800X from the previous generation that quickly, but I could be wrong. I always saw sale prices of the 3800X when the 5000 series was available. So my assumption is that AMD will still produce 5800X chips as long as they have the yields to warrant them. I came in late to the Ryzen platform (e.g. B550), so I missed all of the drama you mentioned. My previous system was a z77 platform running a 3770k, which one day back in November 2020 decided to no longer complete its POST process because of an overvolted usb port and shuts down. I was unsuccessful to get it to complete the boot process and did not have the time to troubleshoot as my main rig was used for work since I was telecommuting to work. At that time, I was able to get a b550 board and 5600X immediately, which has been very good to me and fit my budget at the time. I guess I just want to get the most out of my AM4 system now rather than later when AM5 is released. At that point it may be harder get upgrade parts.
The 3000-series got the XT parts though.

My 1700 had issues with RAM compatibility that was never properly fixed, although that RAM didn't work right with my 3800X when I got it either so... Both systems "worked" but there were little things on both, like the 3800X not reaching the promised boost speeds for at least three months and even with different RAM it took them six months before everything was 100%. AMD needs to deliver more stable platforms at launch, as that kind of stuff is infuriating. That said, Intel seems to be following AMD's lead to a degree, by giving it's partners less time to develop boards for their new chips, which isn't a good sign, as it too lead to issues on launch.
Posted on Reply
#70
mama
TheLostSwedeWent with a 5800X, as the price dropped to the equivalent of the MSRP of the 5700X plus the local VAT here. It was a no brainer in this case.
Don't have the funds to swap out everything and on top of that, I'm going to skip the next first gen platform from AMD.
Wonder if the 'second gen' platform for Intel will be worth the wait...
Posted on Reply
#71
TheLostSwede
News Editor
mamaWonder if the 'second gen' platform for Intel will be worth the wait...
Performance wise, maybe, but the platform isn't changing much.
Posted on Reply
#72
Taraquin
MatsThe 5500 is the worst one.

There's no -G that tells you that it's a Cezanne, just because it doesn't have graphics. The 4000 may be inferior but at least you kind of get that from the number.

With the 5500 you're stuck with PCIE 3.

Let's go all out 2022 and build teH freshest rig ever together with a brand new Radeon 6500XT and BOOM you're stuck with PCIE 3.0 x4.

Did I mention it was all brand new from 2022? :shadedshu:
At PCIe 3.0 and using DD4 they will perform very similar since the very similar 5600G. 5600X is 16% ahead of 5600G in gaming and 17% ahead of 12100F in gaming at 720p. 5500 has a lot more tweakability with pbo, co and running ram at 4200+ vs no OC on 12100F and ram at max 3500-3700 G1. Once tuned 5500 will be 10%+ faster and B450 (no need for B550 since it lacks PCIe 4.0) costs way less than B660.

5500 will cost the same or less than 12100F due to MB and perform better.

If you need PCIe 4.0, buy 3050, 6500/6600 gpu then 12100F is better, or if you buy Asus B660 rog F/G and bclk OC 12100F it will be faster, but price is high then (250usd MB + DDR5).
Posted on Reply
#73
5 o'clock Charlie
TheLostSwedeThe 3000-series got the XT parts though.
Good point about the XT skus, as I completely forgot about those. Though, imho I think we will not see those models in the 5000 series. I guess you can say the 3D models will fill that position. When AMD talked about 3D cache chips last year, the benchmarks they displayed were of a 3D chip version of the 5900X, yet we have not heard anything about a 5900X3D. I wonder if we will see other 3D skus in the 5000 series?
TheLostSwedeMy 1700 had issues with RAM compatibility that was never properly fixed, although that RAM didn't work right with my 3800X when I got it either so... Both systems "worked" but there were little things on both, like the 3800X not reaching the promised boost speeds for at least three months and even with different RAM it took them six months before everything was 100%. AMD needs to deliver more stable platforms at launch, as that kind of stuff is infuriating.
I remember the news about the RAM compatibility and boost frequency issues, but were both due to firmware issues or something else? I can not recall what the exact culprit was with both. Would the ram compatibility issues have any bearing why AMD decided to start their own memory profile standard RAMP with AM5? I agree that ram compatibility should have been ironed out before launch, if not at least within a more timely manner post launch.
TheLostSwedeThat said, Intel seems to be following AMD's lead to a degree, by giving it's partners less time to develop boards for their new chips, which isn't a good sign, as it too lead to issues on launch.
Are you referring to the 500 or 600 board series or both?

Sortof on the memory topic, I still do not fully grasp the reason why Intel decided to have two different memory modes (e.g. gear 1 & gear 2). From my reading, it runs the memory controller frequency either in full 1:1 or half frequency 1:2, so my guess more customization based on what the user's workload requires as both cater different results? I wonder if AMD will follow suit with their next platform? Thanks.
Posted on Reply
#74
Valantar
5 o'clock CharlieGood point about the XT skus, as I completely forgot about those. Though, imho I think we will not see those models in the 5000 series. I guess you can say the 3D models will fill that position. When AMD talked about 3D cache chips last year, the benchmarks they displayed were of a 3D chip version of the 5900X, yet we have not heard anything about a 5900X3D. I wonder if we will see other 3D skus in the 5000 series?
AMD have confirmed that there aren't any more consumer X3D SKUs coming. That demo was an ES chip, and is not coming to market.
5 o'clock CharlieI remember the news about the RAM compatibility and boost frequency issues, but were both due to firmware issues or something else? I can not recall what the exact culprit was with both. Would the ram compatibility issues have any bearing why AMD decided to start their own memory profile standard RAMP with AM5? I agree that ram compatibility should have been ironed out before launch, if not at least within a more timely manner post launch.
My impression is that RAMP is more about two factors: AMD being a significant enough actor in the market to set a standard that might actually be adopted; and Intel making DDR5 XMP a lot more specific and tailored to their chips than previous generations. It makes perfect sense for AMD to do the same, specifically to ensure that people don't expect XMP kits to work flawlessly on AMD.
Posted on Reply
#75
TheLostSwede
News Editor
5 o'clock CharlieAre you referring to the 500 or 600 board series or both?
600-series. The Z690 boards were done in about two months time, which is extremely short by Intel standards.
In the good old days, Intel used to make reference boards they handed out to the motherboard makers and then spend at least six months on helping the board makers finetune their designs, BIOSes and so on. Hence why Intel had quite stable platforms on launch. Now, not so much and the board makers aren't what you'd call thrilled about it. This isn't really public information though.

As for my shiny new 5800X, it works with XMP, first AMD CPU I've had that works with XMP, so that was a positive surprise. Still going to tune my RAM when I have five minutes to spare.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 12:54 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts