Friday, April 8th 2022
First Game Test With the Ryzen 7 5800X3D Appears as Promised
XanxoGaming has now posted its first game benchmark with the Ryzen 7 5800X3D, paired with a NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition. They put it up against an Intel Core i9-12900KS and Core i9-12900K. However, as you might have deduced from the headline of this news post, so far, they've only run a single game, but are promising to deliver more results shortly. That single game so far is Shadow of the Tomb Raider at 720p and using low settings, which means that this is a far cry from a real world scenario, but it does at least give a first taste of what's to come. For whatever reason, the Core i9 systems are using an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti and the CPUs are paired with DDR5 memory rated at 4800 MHz CAS 40. The Ryzen 7 5800X3D has been given another pair of 8 GB modules, so it's now using dual rank memory, but still at 3200 MHz and CAS 14.
In their test, the Core i9-12900K averages around 190 FPS, which they place as their baseline. The Core i9-12900KS manages around 200 FPS, or a bit over a five percent improvement. These benchmark numbers are provided by CapFrameX that claims that due to the low resolution used, the GPU doesn't really matter and although it's not an apples-to-apples comparison, it's very close. So what about the Ryzen 7 5800X3D? Well, it gets an average FPS number of 231, which is a bit odd, since the Intel CPU benchmarks are rounded and the AMD ones are not. Regardless, that's over a 20 percent increase over the Core i9-12900K and over 15 percent of the Core i9-12900KS. XanxoGaming is promising more benchmarks and those will be delivered at 1080p at Ultra settings according to the publication. In other words, this is still not what most of us have been waiting for.
Source:
XanxoGaming
In their test, the Core i9-12900K averages around 190 FPS, which they place as their baseline. The Core i9-12900KS manages around 200 FPS, or a bit over a five percent improvement. These benchmark numbers are provided by CapFrameX that claims that due to the low resolution used, the GPU doesn't really matter and although it's not an apples-to-apples comparison, it's very close. So what about the Ryzen 7 5800X3D? Well, it gets an average FPS number of 231, which is a bit odd, since the Intel CPU benchmarks are rounded and the AMD ones are not. Regardless, that's over a 20 percent increase over the Core i9-12900K and over 15 percent of the Core i9-12900KS. XanxoGaming is promising more benchmarks and those will be delivered at 1080p at Ultra settings according to the publication. In other words, this is still not what most of us have been waiting for.
109 Comments on First Game Test With the Ryzen 7 5800X3D Appears as Promised
Not.
I don't know how the guy managed to achieved such fps.
I guess the main reason for amd, to deliver this new cpus in this time, late, is to sell them to the guys who have the 1000 and 2000 ryzen platforms, like me.
But I don't think it would make any difference for gaming at reasonable resolutions such as 1440p or 4k, at Fullhd most people won't be using a 3090 or a 6900XT hence are GPU limited anyways.
The idea of ultra expensive gaming CPUs is only for a niche market anywhere, people who will pay 3k for a system to play at 1080p 200fps +.
If you play at 4k, non competitive, any cpu, even 7 year old 4790k OC can do the job.
So this screenshot gives us nothing as information :)
-Because at higher resolution there is barely any difference between CPUs!
-Oh... OK then...
Different CPU, Same memory type/speed, same gpu
Here you have:
Different CPU, Different memory type/speed, different GPU
It should be the best mem type/speed that CPU supports.
I don't think it's a good test of this new CPU by any means, but you really can't compare with tests done by TPU.
Then you can be getting 2,000 fps at 4k Ultra but slow turn times or slow tic rates make them a pain to play on thr largest maps which totally changes the game play experience.
I don't believe this for a second, because if true, the 3D would cost more. Neither AMD nor Intel gives something extra for nothing like that..
..well, unless there are very few CPU's available, like so many have suggested, then price can be low like this.