Friday, April 8th 2022

First Game Test With the Ryzen 7 5800X3D Appears as Promised

XanxoGaming has now posted its first game benchmark with the Ryzen 7 5800X3D, paired with a NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition. They put it up against an Intel Core i9-12900KS and Core i9-12900K. However, as you might have deduced from the headline of this news post, so far, they've only run a single game, but are promising to deliver more results shortly. That single game so far is Shadow of the Tomb Raider at 720p and using low settings, which means that this is a far cry from a real world scenario, but it does at least give a first taste of what's to come. For whatever reason, the Core i9 systems are using an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti and the CPUs are paired with DDR5 memory rated at 4800 MHz CAS 40. The Ryzen 7 5800X3D has been given another pair of 8 GB modules, so it's now using dual rank memory, but still at 3200 MHz and CAS 14.

In their test, the Core i9-12900K averages around 190 FPS, which they place as their baseline. The Core i9-12900KS manages around 200 FPS, or a bit over a five percent improvement. These benchmark numbers are provided by CapFrameX that claims that due to the low resolution used, the GPU doesn't really matter and although it's not an apples-to-apples comparison, it's very close. So what about the Ryzen 7 5800X3D? Well, it gets an average FPS number of 231, which is a bit odd, since the Intel CPU benchmarks are rounded and the AMD ones are not. Regardless, that's over a 20 percent increase over the Core i9-12900K and over 15 percent of the Core i9-12900KS. XanxoGaming is promising more benchmarks and those will be delivered at 1080p at Ultra settings according to the publication. In other words, this is still not what most of us have been waiting for.
Source: XanxoGaming
Add your own comment

109 Comments on First Game Test With the Ryzen 7 5800X3D Appears as Promised

#101
Yraggul666
Makaveliif you are gaming at 1440p and above most likely won't be worth it.
I know, you're perfectly right but i plan on not touching this pc for at least 3-4 years and get a new one PciE5/DDR5/AM5 in the future, that's why i want the best AMD has to offer on AM4.
Posted on Reply
#102
Makaveli
Yraggul666I know, you're perfectly right but i plan on not touching this pc for at least 3-4 years and get a new one PciE5/DDR5/AM5 in the future, that's why i want the best AMD has to offer on AM4.
Still not worth it. You will be going from a 5800X to a 5800X3D to gain 5%-%7 at 1440p in games and a regression in other workloads. That won't make a noticeable difference to the longevity of that system.
Posted on Reply
#103
Yraggul666
MakaveliStill not worth it. You will be going from a 5800X to a 5800X3D to gain 5%-%7 at 1440p in games and a regression in other workloads. That won't make a noticeable difference to the longevity of that system.
Maybe better silicon/temps and voltages at least.
I don't care about the slight regression in some workloads, all i care about is gaming and streaming+teamspeak/discord all working at the same time with no hitches.
I know you speak reason but as i said, i plan on this being the last money i spend on this pc, i'll hold on to it for as long as i can...that's my excuse, i'm sticking to it...
Posted on Reply
#104
Makaveli
Yraggul666Maybe better silicon/temps and voltages at least.
I don't care about the slight regression in some workloads, all i care about is gaming and streaming+teamspeak/discord all working at the same time with no hitches.
I know you speak reason but as i said, i plan on this being the last money i spend on this pc, i'll hold on to it for as long as i can...that's my excuse, i'm sticking to it...
wouldn't higher core count help more with this sounds like a 5900X would be a better fit. I'm not telling you what to buy of course its your money.
Posted on Reply
#105
Unregistered
Makaveliwouldn't higher core count help more with this sounds like a 5900X would be a better fit. I'm not telling you what to buy of course its your money.
I agree
Posted on Edit | Reply
#106
kapone32
MakaveliStill not worth it. You will be going from a 5800X to a 5800X3D to gain 5%-%7 at 1440p in games and a regression in other workloads. That won't make a noticeable difference to the longevity of that system.
I feel these chips are best served for anyone who has from 1000 to 3000 series CPUs. The fact that you can just buy the CPU and use all of your existing hardware make this in some ways academic. I am sure this will be one of their best sellers.. If the 5900X keeps falling in price though it is so many ways a much better chip to buy. I really want to see where these are actually priced.
Posted on Reply
#107
Yraggul666
Yeah i'm not going the 5900X route, it's the X3D or i stick to the simple X.
Now i just have to see the pricing......
Posted on Reply
#108
5 o'clock Charlie
Makaveliwouldn't higher core count help more with this sounds like a 5900X would be a better fit. I'm not telling you what to buy of course its your money.
This statement helped me decide on my predicament for upgrading. In addition to those software, I run a VM on a regular basis. The more cores would be more beneficial. But the end goal for myself is to go to a 4K monitor. As shown in the early benchmarks provided in this news post as well as in W1zzard's review, the 5800X3D has no benefit as at that point, games are GPU bound. If I wanted to stay on my current 1080p monitors, then the 5800X3D could make more sense in gaming. But I do more than just game.

I decided to go with the 5900X. Additionally, I was able to pick up one for $365 (before taxes and the use of a handy gift card). Thank you @Makaveli for your advice as well as @TheLostSwede for providing the early benchmarks. I can say I have no regrets in my purchase ;)
Posted on Reply
#109
lexluthermiester
5 o'clock CharlieI decided to go with the 5900X.
That's a great choice of CPU!
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 22nd, 2024 07:33 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts