Friday, April 8th 2022
First Game Test With the Ryzen 7 5800X3D Appears as Promised
XanxoGaming has now posted its first game benchmark with the Ryzen 7 5800X3D, paired with a NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition. They put it up against an Intel Core i9-12900KS and Core i9-12900K. However, as you might have deduced from the headline of this news post, so far, they've only run a single game, but are promising to deliver more results shortly. That single game so far is Shadow of the Tomb Raider at 720p and using low settings, which means that this is a far cry from a real world scenario, but it does at least give a first taste of what's to come. For whatever reason, the Core i9 systems are using an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti and the CPUs are paired with DDR5 memory rated at 4800 MHz CAS 40. The Ryzen 7 5800X3D has been given another pair of 8 GB modules, so it's now using dual rank memory, but still at 3200 MHz and CAS 14.
In their test, the Core i9-12900K averages around 190 FPS, which they place as their baseline. The Core i9-12900KS manages around 200 FPS, or a bit over a five percent improvement. These benchmark numbers are provided by CapFrameX that claims that due to the low resolution used, the GPU doesn't really matter and although it's not an apples-to-apples comparison, it's very close. So what about the Ryzen 7 5800X3D? Well, it gets an average FPS number of 231, which is a bit odd, since the Intel CPU benchmarks are rounded and the AMD ones are not. Regardless, that's over a 20 percent increase over the Core i9-12900K and over 15 percent of the Core i9-12900KS. XanxoGaming is promising more benchmarks and those will be delivered at 1080p at Ultra settings according to the publication. In other words, this is still not what most of us have been waiting for.
Source:
XanxoGaming
In their test, the Core i9-12900K averages around 190 FPS, which they place as their baseline. The Core i9-12900KS manages around 200 FPS, or a bit over a five percent improvement. These benchmark numbers are provided by CapFrameX that claims that due to the low resolution used, the GPU doesn't really matter and although it's not an apples-to-apples comparison, it's very close. So what about the Ryzen 7 5800X3D? Well, it gets an average FPS number of 231, which is a bit odd, since the Intel CPU benchmarks are rounded and the AMD ones are not. Regardless, that's over a 20 percent increase over the Core i9-12900K and over 15 percent of the Core i9-12900KS. XanxoGaming is promising more benchmarks and those will be delivered at 1080p at Ultra settings according to the publication. In other words, this is still not what most of us have been waiting for.
109 Comments on First Game Test With the Ryzen 7 5800X3D Appears as Promised
How the table have turned
Intel also said they would strongly advice against using DDR4 on their 13gens CPU's even they support it what's up with this I am not sure maybe they just want you to steal your kidney I don't know but it's Intel's nutshell policy.I made this as a joke but if AMD really hits it off with their V-cache it should be good for transcoding with the extra cache and other work related stuff
And yes, i know it's probably not worth the upgrade over the normal 5800X...
The the 8350 (well 8 core CPU) ended up been the better choice it seems
As for "but what about in practice", we had Ryzen vs Intel, where Intel was showing "edge" at low resolutions, which was supposed to hint at huge advantage in the upcoming games, but when the said games arrived, its advantage evaporated.
High FPS low resolution testing makes sense when applied using ACTUAL USE CASES such as competitive shooters, but then, it's never 720p to begin with.
Oh, and it is also not Tomb Raider.
It gets beaten by the 12900k at 1080p..
Ill just leave this here for you ;) www.youtube.com/c/RATechYT/videosYou mean Ashes of the benchmark right? come on! you gotta do better then that.......:slap:
Also, I suggest you read the author's conclusion at the end of the article if you can't draw right conclusions yourself.