Sunday, May 29th 2022

Phison Showcases 12 GB/s Speeds for PCIe 5.0 SSDs Through Its New E26 Controller

Phison has showcased the expected performance of its upcoming PS5026-E26 controller, built to usher NVMe SSDs into the PCIe 5.0 realm. The company showcased its new controller's prowess by building a reference SSD design based on 1 TB of Micron's TLC NAND. Phison's new controller has been built from the ground-up to accelerate next-generation SSD workloads - including direct access technologies based on Microsoft's DirectStorage API, accelerated by two ARM Cortex-R5 cores and three proprietary CoXProcessor 2.0 accelerators built on TSMC's 12 nm process.

Phison's internal testing shows its reference SSD achieving sequential read speeds of over 12 GB/s in CrystalDiskMark, with sequential writes going as high as 10 GB/s - a 70% performance increase compared to the world's fastest PCIe 4.0 SSDs, which currently top out at around 7 GB/s sequential speeds. As to 4K performance, one of the most tangible metrics for user experience, random reads are set at around 16.000 IOPS, showcasing room for improvement with further firmware optimizations for actual shipping products.

Interestingly, Phison opted for the M.2 2580 form-factor for its proof-of-concept SSD, which features a slightly wider PCB and connector footprint that's not backwards compatible with M.2 2280 slots. Expect SSDs based on Phison's PS5026-E26 controller to hit the market later this year - closer to AMD's release of its 600-series chipsets for its next-generation AM5 platform.
Source: TechSpot
Add your own comment

60 Comments on Phison Showcases 12 GB/s Speeds for PCIe 5.0 SSDs Through Its New E26 Controller

#26
Minus Infinity
This card is so slow, we just had one announced the other week with 13000MB/s read and 12000MB/s writes. That's a huge difference. Oh man my real world experience is going to be so much better with PCI-E 5 drives.:roll:
Posted on Reply
#27
Unregistered
This kinda reminds me of internet connections. Some people have 1000Mb/s connection and use it for online gaming and youtube. Some of my friends have even 500Mb/s lines and i still don't really see why, anyone need that much speed.

These PCIe 5 drives are going to be a bit pointless really imo. A fast PCIe gen 4 drive is plenty fast enough imo. It's the same as when ADL came out and everyone pooed at Intel for putting a PCIe 5 GPU slot now AAMD are doing the same without there even been any video cards that support it. I suppose you can use it for expensive first gen PCIe 5 SSDs though at least.
Posted on Edit | Reply
#28
R0H1T
Well these (premium) things are one of the reasons service providers or brands can charge extra whilst offering other stuff at (semi)decent prices! Pretty sure the margins at the low end with SATA or QLC drives are wafer thin, these drives allow manufacturers to continue selling those cheaper models :ohwell:
Posted on Reply
#29
mechtech
ZetZetWell hopefully when DirectStorage starts getting implemented and improved we will see the difference in games.
Yep. One can always hope. I give it 5 more years at least ;)
Posted on Reply
#30
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
ChaitanyaThat is so common in gyms here, people just work on upper body while having chicken legs.
as someone with the legs of an adult who grew up without a car in a farm area with calves the size of cows... fucksake it's hard to find pants that fit.
Getting your legs stuck in pants is just... so special.
(And no it's not an obesity thing, just that for 5 years or so i was riding 15KM to work, working in tobacco fields and vineyards, and then riding home)


So the real reason RAND4K is slow is because phison cant find pats that fit
Posted on Reply
#31
TheUn4seen
TiggerThis kinda reminds me of internet connections. Some people have 1000Mb/s connection and use it for online gaming and youtube. Some of my friends have even 500Mb/s lines and i still don't really see why, anyone need that much speed.

These PCIe 5 drives are going to be a bit pointless really imo. A fast PCIe gen 4 drive is plenty fast enough imo. It's the same as when ADL came out and everyone pooed at Intel for putting a PCIe 5 GPU slot now AAMD are doing the same without there even been any video cards that support it. I suppose you can use it for expensive first gen PCIe 5 SSDs though at least.
The number is higher, isn't it? Marketing people only care about being able to put big, flashy numbers on a website and pay some influencers to fake excitement about how "OMG lightning fast it is". Put a "GAMING" on it just to be sure. Real world advantages are just a boring, technical stuff no self-respecting consumer understands or cares about.
Personally I'd be infinitely more excited about high capacity cheap SSDs. A manufacturer of a reasonably priced 10TB SSD would absolutely get my money - make it 3.5" and SATA to cut costs, I don't care. I just want to get rid of the unreliable and noisy spinning rust nonsense from my life.
Posted on Reply
#32
Tomorrow
zlobbyAre you talking about 3DXpoint?
Yes. I refer to it as Optane because it easier to spell than 3DXpoint and since no one else is making 3DXpoint based products other than Intel under Optane branding. The same way i refer to Ryzen instead of Zen despite Zen being the underlying architecture.
Posted on Reply
#33
chrcoluk
Ok so my orginal thought in the other thread wasnt wrong the connector does change on the wider pcb, thats dumb then.

The most impressive thing from this showcase to me is they got a toolless install for the m.2.
TheUn4seenThe number is higher, isn't it? Marketing people only care about being able to put big, flashy numbers on a website and pay some influencers to fake excitement about how "OMG lightning fast it is". Put a "GAMING" on it just to be sure. Real world advantages are just a boring, technical stuff no self-respecting consumer understands or cares about.
Personally I'd be infinitely more excited about high capacity cheap SSDs. A manufacturer of a reasonably priced 10TB SSD would absolutely get my money - make it 3.5" and SATA to cut costs, I don't care. I just want to get rid of the unreliable and noisy spinning rust nonsense from my life.
As we see with 500hz monitors, marketing rules the roost, as you said bigger numbers.
Posted on Reply
#34
Wirko
chrcolukOk so my orginal thought in the other thread wasnt wrong the connector does change on the wider pcb, thats dumb then.
It doesn't, what makes you think it does? It would no longer be "M.2" with a different connector.

EDIT: If the connector is indeed wider, it should at least be backwards compatible (Gen 5 slot, Gen 4 SSD) ...

Also, is space on (some or many) motherboards, or PCIe adapter cards, so constrained that a 3 mm wider PCB wouldn't fit in its place?
Posted on Reply
#35
DeathtoGnomes
MusselsSo the real reason RAND4K is slow is because phison cant find pats that fit
pants?
WirkoEDIT: If the connector is indeed wider, it should at least be backwards compatible (Gen 5 slot, Gen 4 SSD) ...
I disagree, Gen 5 should make a clean break.
Posted on Reply
#36
Tomorrow
The PCB is wider (25mm instead on 22mm). The connector itself is the same.
So on a bare PCB there should be no restrictions mounting 25mm to a 22mm slot.
However on boards where 22mm wide spacing is assumed by motherboard covers there may be compatibility problems going forward.
Posted on Reply
#37
kapone32
There must be a way to incorporate the innovations from Optane into the current NVME space. Sequential currently only makes sense if you have EPIC or make videos. We need to see improvement in regular workloads.
Posted on Reply
#38
Metroid
dj-electricPrepare for a wave of drives that can flex its sequentials, but barely top randoms.
Disgraceful, although sequential is good for few things, nothing is better than 4k random read and write at moment for true speed.
Posted on Reply
#39
Assimilator
Musselsas someone with the legs of an adult who grew up without a car in a farm area with calves the size of cows... fucksake it's hard to find pants that fit.
Getting your legs stuck in pants is just... so special.
(And no it's not an obesity thing, just that for 5 years or so i was riding 15KM to work, working in tobacco fields and vineyards, and then riding home)


So the real reason RAND4K is slow is because phison cant find pats that fit
Bro, do you even lift?
Posted on Reply
#40
R-T-B
TomorrowDidn't some companies experiment with Z-NAND and XL-NAND?
I don't know about XL-NAND, but Z-NAND evolved into the 3d stacking tech everyone uses today.
Posted on Reply
#41
DeathtoGnomes
AssimilatorBro, do you even lift?
Does 12 ounces at a time count? 3D stacking x2 is the call.
Posted on Reply
#42
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
AssimilatorBro, do you even lift?
These sequential rides are giving my lower back some fragmentation issues, so my lift speeds pretty low


As much as this tech annoys me by changing the dimensions, at least its fully backwards compatible and not REQUIRED to be wider - we might get lucky with fat 5.0's in 4.0 devices, if theres enough clearance


If the electrical connector is changed and it stops being compatible, i'll have a tantrum
Posted on Reply
#43
Unregistered
If RND4k is so important over SEQ speed, then these Gen 5 drives are irrelevant till the RND4k speeds are increased.

Why are they even so low? is it something to do with the interface or OS or what?
#44
Chrispy_
TiggerIf RND4k is so important over SEQ speed, then these Gen 5 drives are irrelevant till the RND4k speeds are increased.

Why are they even so low? is it something to do with the interface or OS or what?
It's to do with the access latency; Memory stored on an Optane drive is essentially raw access - the Optane controller can stream data off the 3D XPoint dies like a CPUs IMC can stream data off DRAM. We're talking 10 microseconds of delay from request to data arrival.

SSDs are more complex beasts, their controllers do parity and error-checking, encryption, compression/decompression, and now conversion from SLC to TLC/QLC all simultaneously. Even the highest-grade NAND is riddled with manufacturing defects so the controllers have to work around these. NAND is fragile with limited program/erase cycles and so minimising the amount and number of times written to it is vital. All of this NAND management to compensate for flaws in the technology takes time so a good SSD controller is 50x slower than Optane, with the best controllers on the market barely able to break 500microseconds in a best-case scenario.

If they wanted to, companies like Samsung could make NAND controllers that were lightning fast like Optane but they'd wear out the NAND in a couple of weeks and the data would be constantly corrupting - you'd be lucky to get back what you put in most of the time. So realistically, the NAND management required to make NAND a viable storage technology is enormously complex, and cannot be omitted. Until flawless yields of 100,000 P/E-cycle NAND that have near-zero defects are common, we're going to have this 0.5-1.0ms latency on SSDs that caps IOPS and 4K performance.
Posted on Reply
#45
AlwaysHope
Have to wait literally years for game devs to catch up with this tech, they still have not optimised for PCIe v4.0 yet in current game engines.
Posted on Reply
#46
Unregistered
Chrispy_It's to do with the access latency; Memory stored on an Optane drive is essentially raw access - the Optane controller can stream data off the 3D XPoint dies like a CPUs IMC can stream data off DRAM. We're talking 10 microseconds of delay from request to data arrival.

SSDs are more complex beasts, their controllers do parity and error-checking, encryption, compression/decompression, and now conversion from SLC to TLC/QLC all simultaneously. Even the highest-grade NAND is riddled with manufacturing defects so the controllers have to work around these. NAND is fragile with limited program/erase cycles and so minimising the amount and number of times written to it is vital. All of this NAND management to compensate for flaws in the technology takes time so a good SSD controller is 50x slower than Optane, with the best controllers on the market barely able to break 500microseconds in a best-case scenario.

If they wanted to, companies like Samsung could make NAND controllers that were lightning fast like Optane but they'd wear out the NAND in a couple of weeks and the data would be constantly corrupting - you'd be lucky to get back what you put in most of the time. So realistically, the NAND management required to make NAND a viable storage technology is enormously complex, and cannot be omitted. Until flawless yields of 100,000 P/E-cycle NAND that have near-zero defects are common, we're going to have this 0.5-1.0ms latency on SSDs that caps IOPS and 4K performance.
So is the memory on Optane unlimited writes like normal ram?

I guess we will be stuck with slow RND4K for a long time by the looks of it.

EDIT

Have to say the load times on Sniper Elite 5 are the quickest i have seen for a long time, the game is on one of my WD SN850's
#47
Chrispy_
TiggerSo is the memory on Optane unlimited writes like normal ram?

I guess we will be stuck with slow RND4K for a long time by the looks of it.

EDIT

Have to say the load times on Sniper Elite 5 are the quickest i have seen for a long time, the game is on one of my WD SN850's
Yeah, if you're unsure on how Optane works it's worth going back to the deep dives on the original 900P reviews.
It's not quite RAM, but it shares much more in common with RAM than it does with NAND, including the cost per gigabyte :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#48
chrcoluk
WirkoIt doesn't, what makes you think it does? It would no longer be "M.2" with a different connector.

EDIT: If the connector is indeed wider, it should at least be backwards compatible (Gen 5 slot, Gen 4 SSD) ...

Also, is space on (some or many) motherboards, or PCIe adapter cards, so constrained that a 3 mm wider PCB wouldn't fit in its place?
Me reading the first post. I will quote the relevant part.
Interestingly, Phison opted for the M.2 2580 form-factor for its proof-of-concept SSD, which features a slightly wider PCB and connector footprint that's not backwards compatible with M.2 2280 slots.
Posted on Reply
#49
MentalAcetylide
Musselsas someone with the legs of an adult who grew up without a car in a farm area with calves the size of cows... fucksake it's hard to find pants that fit.
Getting your legs stuck in pants is just... so special.
(And no it's not an obesity thing, just that for 5 years or so i was riding 15KM to work, working in tobacco fields and vineyards, and then riding home)


So the real reason RAND4K is slow is because phison cant find pats that fit
At that point, I would start wearing bell-bottom pants or hire a taylor. Its no joke wearing pants that are too tight on the lower extremities. That is the making of DVTs & PEs
Posted on Reply
#50
Tomorrow
chrcolukMe reading the first post. I will quote the relevant part.
TomorrowThe PCB is wider (25mm instead on 22mm). The connector itself is the same.
So on a bare PCB there should be no restrictions mounting 25mm to a 22mm slot.
However on boards where 22mm wide spacing is assumed by motherboard covers there may be compatibility problems going forward.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 15th, 2025 04:08 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts