Waiting for review.

One of the problems with PCIe SSDs is that the SSD controllers get very hot because they are manufactured using old lithography to be sold at slightly lower prices.

Controller manufacturers prefer to make them with high electrical consumption rather than making them in more advanced lithography with lower consumption.

"The 2 TB SKU is also the largest size available for now and the Platinum P51 will also come in 1 TB and 500 GB flavours."

Why downsizing to max 2 TB? Why are we going backwards? How far back will this go?

640Kb should be enough for anyone?

Finally! Been waiting all year for this!

Is there Anyone working on a plain desktop/laptop (excluding exotic workstation that's running multiple VM's or is being used as an ingest station for some reason) that really needs even faster storage instead of just a lot more?

I'm a storage nerd, always have been, and I'm sure some of the people reading/commenting here are as well so I will preemptively apologize because they've probably heard me give this diatribe previously, but I want a storage manufacturer to release an all SLC drive for the consumer market. They have them in enterprise and the testing shows they get extremely close to Optane in low queue depth rand reads and writes, not to mention insane endurance. I just wish someone would release some 250GB and 500GB options and at a decent price (though obviously higher than TLC options).

PCIe 5 0 drives really offer nothing compelling to your average user, just as 4.0 drives really didn't either over 3.0 drives....in fact, I'd be willing to bet that absent a large, sequential file transfer, your average user cannot differentiate between the three, but if you've ever had a chance to use a PC with an optane drive as the OS drive, you can perceive a difference (or at least I've convinced myself of that after getting my hands on a discount Intel 905p a few months back).

As it stands now, I feel like the real upgrades in consumer SSDs are more dependent on NAND manufacturers releasing new generations of NAND with increased MT/s (I think the fastest consumers see is 2400 MT/s but I think there is 3200MT/s out there) as opposed to increasing the PCIe bandwidth, either way....I want all SLC drives.

AnarchoPrimitivI'm a storage nerd, always have been, and I'm sure some of the people ....

How about micron revives optane?

kondaminIs there Anyone working on a plain desktop/laptop (excluding exotic workstation that's running multiple VM's or is being used as an ingest station for some reason) that really needs even faster storage instead of just a lot more?

I think this has been a question ever sonce second generation of PCIe drives hit the market - benchmarks have had a really big trouble showing any progress besides sequential speeds. All the program startup times, installation times etc are more or less bottlenecked by other things than drives' continuous speed.

kondaminHow about micron revives optane?

you mean 3D X-Point, Optane was Intel's Trademark while Micron had it under 3D X-Point.

AnarchoPrimitivThey have them in enterprise and the testing shows they get extremely close to Optane in low queue depth rand reads and writes

Even in poor consumer SSDs, free performance is on the table for anyone to pick. Why are OS, application and game developers never expected to learn a thing or two about using queues?

NhonhoOne of the problems with PCIe SSDs is that the SSD controllers get very hot because they are manufactured using old lithography to be sold at slightly lower prices.

Controller manufacturers prefer to make them with high electrical consumption rather than making them in more advanced lithography with lower consumption.

This new disk should be based on a 7nm controller as the Sk Hynix Atomos Prime on the Solidigm PS1010/1030, but with more advanced 238L nand flash which is the main limit on sequential speeds.
www.techpowerup.com/ssd-specs/solidigm-d7-ps1010-1-9-tb.d2148

This is going to make it more efficient than first gen5 disks, not cooler.

AsniThis new disk should be based on a 7nm controller as the Sk Hynix Atomos Prime on the Solidigm PS1010/1030, but with more advanced 238L nand flash which is the main limit on sequential speeds.
www.techpowerup.com/ssd-specs/solidigm-d7-ps1010-1-9-tb.d2148

This is going to make it more efficient than first gen5 disks, not cooler.

It's apparently called Alistar and has a higher model number and different packaging.
www.techpowerup.com/ssd-specs/sk-hynix-platinum-p51-1-tb.d1967

TheLostSwedeIt's apparently called Alistar and has a higher model number and different packaging.
www.techpowerup.com/ssd-specs/sk-hynix-platinum-p51-1-tb.d1967

Yep, as i said it won't be the same controller but most probably something similar for the consumer market.
Unlike Phison, in the past SK Hynix did not recycle an old gen controller for newer gen disks. That's what we experienced on the E16 (revised E12) and the E26 (E18+ coprocessor).

TBW rating is probably only for warranty purposes.

It usually goes like Warranty valid for 5 year or up to 1200TBW which ever comes first.

If you are heavy duty user they want to escape warranty responsibility as soon as possible and cap you out at 1200TBW for warranty claims.

The true TBW is probably at least double or more for the 2TB.