Sunday, July 17th 2022
Microsoft Plans Windows 12 for 2024
Microsoft is planning a speedy launch cycle for its next-generation Windows 12 operating system, with reports pointing to a 2024 release to market. This would give Windows 11 roughly 3 years as the company's latest client OS. It could use a major release like Windows 12 to significantly change the user interface, introduce support for newer types of hardware, as well as newer APIs. At this point, Windows 12 hasn't hit any of the public Insider release cycles, so there are no hints as to what direction the OS's development is headed.
Source:
PC World
98 Comments on Microsoft Plans Windows 12 for 2024
Touchscreen support is okay, I guess, but I still have never liked it enough to care - I used two generations of Surface tablets, along with earlier touchscreen PCs like the OQO. Still use touchscreens at work, and never has the Win8 "touchscreen UI" part ever helped. It's always the little Explorer tweaks for touchscreens (checkboxes, long press, better on screen KB, etc) that were the most beneficial, and these were in Win7, with parts in Vista and XP.
The best change they can do is bring back a sleeker windows 2000 interface back
For most of Windows' existence, Microsoft has had engineers working on the next major Windows version. When Windows 95 had just released, they started working on Windows 98. Same story with Windows 2000 and XP. Vista was already in the works and 7 was starting to be planned out before Windows XP launched, though Vista's development was later reset. Windows 7 ended up being a refined version of Vista because most of its intended new features and changes were integrated in Vista anyway. Windows 10 was also in the works before Windows 8 launched.
Windows 11 is the only one to break this tradition because Microsoft had not planned to make new major versions anymore. Until they changed their minds.
At least look at some concerns user had for example, Win 11 and Win 10 the user interface as well as
start menu.
I still prefer Win 10 due to the start menu as well as much familiar user interface.
As well as Windows installation, in the past all along had been done offline until Win 11.
Why force online installation with requirement of MS account before the setup continues?
It's tricky to configure and setup Win 11 especially loading manufacturers system drivers
which have to be done offline. Without MS update messing up the system drivers especially
the graphic card driver.
Till date updating drivers like graphic card, the update have to be offline before the driver can be updated properly.
When the old driver is removed, MS update will install the missing graphic card which causes issue
that is commonly faced with AMD Graphic cards.
These are the issues which is my concern, the MS update auto driver install should be under optional update like previous OS.
Is there a Linux or freeBSD windows replacement yet? I would pay for it if there is.
Now there is macOS11 and macOS12, MSFT cannot afford to fall behind on the numbers war! :D
OSX has a new version every year.
The industry has done this for a long time, just like inplace upgrades. It appears the normal modern warfare playing consumer userbase is shook by this, but if anything MS is just catching up to what everyone has already been doing.
An OS has only one job: to make sure your system runs the programs you want. It doesn't need any fancy improvement. It just needs to work as simply as possible.
Oh, and call me back when Microsoft has a working start menu. Really funny almost a year later and the keyboard shortcut to shut down (win+x +u +u) can fail as the keyboard shortcut randomly disappears from the Win+X menu.