Monday, April 24th 2023

AMD Ryzen 7000X3D Processors Prone to Physical Damage with Voltage-assisted Overclocking, Motherboard Vendors Rush BIOS Updates with Voltage Limiters

AMD Ryzen 7000X3D processors are prone to irreversible physical damage if CPU overclocking is attempted at some of the higher VDDCR voltages (the main power domain for the CPU cores). A Redditor who goes by Speedrookie, attempted to overclock their Ryzen 7 7800X3D, leading to an irreversible failure. The motherboard socket and the processor's land-grid contacts, show signs of overheating damage caused by the contacts melting from too much current draw.

A Ryzen 7000X3D processor features a special CPU complex die (CCD) with stacked 3D Vertical Cache memory. This cache die is located in the central region over the CCD where its 32 MB on-die L3 cache is located, while the difference in Z-height of the stacked die is filled up by structural silicon, which sit over the regions of the CCD with the 8 "Zen 4" CPU cores. It stands to reason that besides having an inferior thermal transfer setup to conventional "Zen 4" CCDs (without the 3DV cache), the CCD itself has a higher power-draw at any given clock-speed than a conventional CCD (since it's also powering the L3D). This is the main reason why overclocking capabilities on the 7000X3D processors are almost non-existent, and the processor's power limits are generally lower than their regular Ryzen 7000X counterparts. Attempting to dial up voltage kicks up the perfect storm for these processors.
Igor's Lab posted a detailed analysis of the region of the Socket AM5 land-grid most susceptible to a burn-out in the above scenario. The central region of the LGA has 93 pins dedicated to the VDDCR power domain, dispersed in a mostly checkered pattern, toward the center of the land-grid. Igor isolated 6 of these VDDCR pins in particular, which are most prone to physical damage, as they are located in a region below the CCD that sees it sandwiched between the L3D (stacked 3D Vertical cache die), and the fiberglass substrate below. Apparently, AMD's thermal and electrical protection mechanisms aren't able to prevent a runaway overheating of the pins that causes the substrate to melt, deform, and bulge outward, resulting in irreversible damage to both the processor and the socket.

Meanwhile, AMD's motherboard partners are rushing to release UEFI BIOS updates for their entire lineups of motherboards, which enforce tighter limits on the VDDCR voltage. MSI is the first motherboard manufacturer with such updates. MSI, in a press statement, stated that it has redesigned automated overclocking for 7000X3D processors. "The BIOS now only supports negative offset voltage settings, which can reduce the CPU voltage only," the MSI statement to Tom's Hardware reads. "MSI Center also restricts any direct voltage and frequency adjustments, ensuring that the CPU won't be damaged due to over-voltage." On the other hand, the update introduces an automated overclocking feature called Enhanced Mode Boost, which optimizes PBO settings to improve boost frequency residency, without any manual voltage adjustments.
Sources: Tom's Hardware 1, 2, Igor's Lab, Speedrookie (Reddit)
Add your own comment

258 Comments on AMD Ryzen 7000X3D Processors Prone to Physical Damage with Voltage-assisted Overclocking, Motherboard Vendors Rush BIOS Updates with Voltage Limiters

#126
AusWolf
"Overclocking is dead" - said by so many people so many times. It's not 2002 anymore, guys.
Posted on Reply
#127
JustBenching
AusWolf"Overclocking is dead" - said by so many people so many times. It's not 2002 anymore, guys.
I am highly in doubt that this thing was caused by overclocking. Degrading your CPU? Sure, that can happen, considering the 3ds are supposedly very prone to high voltages. But actually - physically burning the CPU and the socket? That's completely unfathomable to me. Something must have gone catastrophically wrong here, increased soc voltage on it's own cannot result in this. How much power does the SOC draw, even at those elevated voltages? 20 watts? 30 watts? 50 watts? Let's just say 100w for good measure. Absolutely no way that burns the socket. And burning the CPU is even more difficult, they have built in temperature protections, you can push 2 volts to a CPU and it won't physically burn. It will degrade, it will probably instadie, but it won't cook itself.


And I find it funny cause reading the previous pages people are blaming the users that overclocked their chips despite amds warnings.. Yeah, right, cause overclocking should definitely burn a socket. Like wtf - this is supposedly a technological forum, lol
Posted on Reply
#128
Dirt Chip
Is there info whether the affected CPU frid on a new build or as an drop-in upgrade?

Anyway, first gen problems never miss on producing action.
When you are the pioneer you are prone to more danger, that's part of the fun in it.
Posted on Reply
#129
AusWolf
fevgatosI am highly in doubt that this thing was caused by overclocking. Degrading your CPU? Sure, that can happen, considering the 3ds are supposedly very prone to high voltages. But actually - physically burning the CPU and the socket? That's completely unfathomable to me. Something must have gone catastrophically wrong here, increased soc voltage on it's own cannot result in this. How much power does the SOC draw, even at those elevated voltages? 20 watts? 30 watts? 50 watts? Let's just say 100w for good measure. Absolutely no way that burns the socket. And burning the CPU is even more difficult, they have built in temperature protections, you can push 2 volts to a CPU and it won't physically burn. It will degrade, it will probably instadie, but it won't cook itself.


And I find it funny cause reading the previous pages people are blaming the users that overclocked their chips despite amds warnings.. Yeah, right, cause overclocking should definitely burn a socket. Like wtf - this is supposedly a technological forum, lol
Breaking news... giving 10,000 Volts to a CPU results in a slight chance of frying it. :roll:
Posted on Reply
#130
JustBenching
AusWolfBreaking news... giving 10,000 Volts to a CPU results in a slight chance of frying it. :roll:
You can't even do that nowadays, ocp and ovp will cut you off instantly. It's really hard to physically damage your hardware via software nowadays. I literally tried to instakill my 12900k in order to justify keeping my 13900k, but that sucker didn't budge. I went all the way up to 1.64 volts at 5.6 ghz all core, I hit 117c at 400w, and it happily chugged along playing hogwarts :roll:
Posted on Reply
#131
phanbuey
fevgatosI am highly in doubt that this thing was caused by overclocking. Degrading your CPU? Sure, that can happen, considering the 3ds are supposedly very prone to high voltages. But actually - physically burning the CPU and the socket? That's completely unfathomable to me. Something must have gone catastrophically wrong here, increased soc voltage on it's own cannot result in this. How much power does the SOC draw, even at those elevated voltages? 20 watts? 30 watts? 50 watts? Let's just say 100w for good measure. Absolutely no way that burns the socket. And burning the CPU is even more difficult, they have built in temperature protections, you can push 2 volts to a CPU and it won't physically burn. It will degrade, it will probably instadie, but it won't cook itself.


And I find it funny cause reading the previous pages people are blaming the users that overclocked their chips despite amds warnings.. Yeah, right, cause overclocking should definitely burn a socket. Like wtf - this is supposedly a technological forum, lol
People in deep denial that there's some fault of the hardware / AGESA trying to blame user. But yeah the consensus seems to be that you need a ridiculous amount of voltage to bubble a chip like that. Across multiple motherboards and NOT just 3D chips -- seems to be an agesa/bios update issue the more that comes out.
Posted on Reply
#132
Zubasa
fevgatosI am highly in doubt that this thing was caused by overclocking. Degrading your CPU? Sure, that can happen, considering the 3ds are supposedly very prone to high voltages. But actually - physically burning the CPU and the socket? That's completely unfathomable to me. Something must have gone catastrophically wrong here, increased soc voltage on it's own cannot result in this. How much power does the SOC draw, even at those elevated voltages? 20 watts? 30 watts? 50 watts? Let's just say 100w for good measure. Absolutely no way that burns the socket. And burning the CPU is even more difficult, they have built in temperature protections, you can push 2 volts to a CPU and it won't physically burn. It will degrade, it will probably instadie, but it won't cook itself.
LGA sockets are known to burn when over-volted / overclocked for a LONG time.
www.anandtech.com/show/2859

Posted on Reply
#133
JustBenching
phanbueyPeople in deep denial that there's some fault of the hardware / AGESA trying to blame user. But yeah the consensus seems to be that you need a ridiculous amount of voltage to bubble a chip like that. Across multiple motherboards and NOT just 3D chips -- seems to be an agesa/bios update issue the more that comes out.
Well it's kinda self evident, I mean what temperatures are needed for the socket and or the cpu to physically damage themselves? Probably more than 150c. Temperature protection should have stopped that way before it happens
ZubasaLGA sockets are known to burn when over-volted / overclocked for a LONG time.
www.anandtech.com/show/2859

Yeah, with subzero cooling. Thats my point, the cpu would have seized to exist way before any damage was done to the motherboard with normal cooling.

The infamous 7980xe also was also able to burn the socket, because it had insanely good heat dissipation and you could keep pumping volts into it until the socket went kapoot. But that cannot happen with Ryzen, a single ccd zen 4 will melt before you can push over 150w at it.
Posted on Reply
#134
AusWolf
fevgatosWell it's kinda self evident, I mean what temperatures are needed for the socket and or the cpu to physically damage themselves? Probably more than 150c. Temperature protection should have stopped that way before it happens


Yeah, with subzero cooling. Thats my point, the cpu would have seized to exist way before any damage was done to the motherboard with normal cooling.

The infamous 7980xe also was also able to burn the socket, because it had insanely good heat dissipation and you could keep pumping volts into it until the socket went kapoot. But that cannot happen with Ryzen, a single ccd zen 4 will melt before you can push over 150w at it.
This here is just another piece of media sensationalism trying to gain views/reads by blaming the company for a user's stupidity. Just like the cracked 6800 XTs that have been mined on, then improperly stored. The media obviously had to blame the drivers because drivers can obviously overvolt a GPU up to the point when it cracks in half without user intervention. Obviously...

Can we do some proper investigation before posting sensationalist news next time, please?

On the one hand, we've got this smear campaign purely for the views, then we have the same media outlets/users crying that there's no competition in the modern PC industry. Absolutely disgusting!
Posted on Reply
#135
Dirt Chip
One thing is for sure- they must AGESA the problem.
Posted on Reply
#136
AusWolf
Dirt ChipOne thing is for sure- they must AGESA the problem.
Yep. We need an AGESA update to prevent people from using their CPUs at stupidly high voltages. Idiot-proofing is the way these days. Being sensible is so oldschool!
Posted on Reply
#137
Zubasa
fevgatosYeah, with subzero cooling. Thats my point, the cpu would have seized to exist way before any damage was done to the motherboard with normal cooling.

The infamous 7980xe also was also able to burn the socket, because it had insanely good heat dissipation and you could keep pumping volts into it until the socket went kapoot. But that cannot happen with Ryzen, a single ccd zen 4 will melt before you can push over 150w at it.
It could depend on how the CPU died, if the cpu internal circuitry is melted shut it is bascially a short until the traces are completely destroyed.
Many boards now have VRMs so powerful that they can sustain the current for a while if OCP for some reason doesn't kick in / isn't set properly.
Posted on Reply
#138
Dirt Chip
AusWolfYep. We need an AGESA update to prevent people from using their CPUs at stupidly high voltages.
And to kill any CPU\memory OC posiabilaty to all ZEN CPU`s?
Sound like a bad move aginst all those OC orianted PR mobos and will put AMD CPU`s at permanent disadvantage.
Posted on Reply
#139
MarsM4N
What just came to my mind, motherboard manufacturers do not actually write their own BIOS'es. They buy the "core BIOS" from a vendor and modify to fit their boards.

So could it be that the BIOS vendor messed up here? :confused: Most motherboard manufacturers get their core BIOS from AMI (American Megatrends), so that would be a common denominator.

"Most PC motherboard suppliers licensed a BIOS "core" and toolkit from a commercial third party, known as an "independent BIOS vendor" or IBV. The motherboard manufacturer then customized this BIOS to suit its own hardware. For this reason, updated BIOSes are normally obtained directly from the motherboard manufacturer." (Source: Wikipedia)
Posted on Reply
#140
AusWolf
Dirt ChipAnd to kill any CPU\memory OC posiabilaty to all ZEN CPU`s?
Sound like a bad move aginst all those OC orianted PR mobos and will put AMD CPU`s at permanent disadvantage.
I was trying to be sarcastic. :ohwell:

Honestly, I think every overclocker should first be clear on what they're doing, and not make a fuss on online media and blame the manufacturer when something goes wrong. It's just childish.
Posted on Reply
#141
nguyen
Well, the actual user errors here are trusting AMD with their dysfunctional QA.

Every AM5 mobo maker is frantically deleting old BIOSes from their websites and put out latest BIOS with limited voltages, user errors....yeah right
Posted on Reply
#142
AusWolf
nguyenWell, the actual user errors here are trusting AMD with their dysfunctional QA.

Every AM5 mobo maker is frantically deleting old BIOSes from their websites and put out latest BIOS with limited voltages, user errors....yeah right
Then why did we not hear about any dead CPU until now? Why does the article specifically mention "voltage-assisted overclocking"? High voltage OC is not user error, surely! :kookoo:
Posted on Reply
#143
Zubasa
AusWolfThen why did we not hear about any dead CPU until now? Why does the article specifically mention "voltage-assisted overclocking"? High voltage OC is not user error, surely! :kookoo:
I wouldn't pin it on the user so soon. DIY motherboards often run things out of spec even by default.
Posted on Reply
#144
AusWolf
ZubasaI wouldn't pin it on the user so soon. DIY motherboard of often run things out of spec even by default.
The article clearly states "voltage-assisted overclocking" even in the title. I wouldn't call that default.
Posted on Reply
#145
Zubasa
AusWolfThe article clearly states "voltage-assisted overclocking" even in the title. I wouldn't call that default.
Everything running out of spec is considered overclocking FYI, its doesn't have to be manual.
Intel technically considers XMP as OC as well, an so does AMD with EXPO.
Posted on Reply
#146
AusWolf
ZubasaEverything running out of spec is considered overclocking FYI, its doesn't have to be manual.
Intel technically considers XMP as OC as well, an so does AMD with EXPO.
From the article:
AMD Ryzen 7000X3D processors are prone to irreversible physical damage if CPU overclocking is attempted at some of the higher VDDCR voltages (the main power domain for the CPU cores). A Redditor who goes by Speedrookie, attempted to overclock their Ryzen 7 7800X3D, leading to an irreversible failure.
It's clear as day to me.
Posted on Reply
#147
MarsM4N
AusWolfFrom the article:

It's clear as day to me.
Article is inaccurate. ;) Check the source: 7800X3D just killed itself and my mobo (Reddit)
Quote: "No CPU overclocking, just memory via the EXPO 1 profile."

AMD however does consider running RAM faster than DDR5-5200 as "out of spec" overclocking. Even though they're advertising & selling it as a safe feature. You don't have to change voltages manually to crazy levels, just enabling the built in EXPO RAM setting will void you warranty. Some shady business right there. Intel does the same, though.
Posted on Reply
#148
AusWolf
MarsM4NArticle is inaccurate. ;) Check the source: 7800X3D just killed itself and my mobo (Reddit)
Quote: "No CPU overclocking, just memory via the EXPO 1 profile."

AMD however does consider running RAM faster than DDR5-5200 as "out of spec" overclocking. Even though they're advertising & selling it as a safe feature. You don't have to change voltages manually to crazy levels, just enabling the built in EXPO RAM setting will void you warranty. Some shady business right there. Intel does the same, though.
Ah okay... then I guess 6000 MHz isn't the sweet spot with X3D chips anymore. Or maybe Asus botched something in their BIOS that messed with the built-in protections of the CPU. This definitely needs to be investigated.

I wonder what his SoC voltage was at the time of the damage. My board defaults to VSoC = VDIMM = 1.35 V in my case, but it runs fine with 1.2 V and EXPO enabled.
Posted on Reply
#149
Redwoodz
I am making notes of all the schills in this topic for future use. That includes Derbauer. He needs to be removed from Hwbot at this point. He's nothing more than a corparate schill.
All the other humans in this thread over-reacting to Asus' and some Reddit user blunders need to take reading comprehension.

No one said their MSI mobo fried there chip, MSI updated the bios to prevent idiots from frying their chip. No one but Derbauer has seen any other failure. I bet he tried real hard to fry that chip too.
AEMP/DOCP
Asus advertises the unique abilities they provide to overclock beyond AMD's guidelines. It's a selling point. EXPO and DOCP/AEMP are 2 different things.
Posted on Reply
#150
TheDeeGee
This issue is recall worthy, cuz good luck to the average joe flashing a BIOS.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 22nd, 2024 10:24 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts