Thursday, May 18th 2023

Intel Announces Arc GPU and Core CPU Bundles for Balanced Builds

Intel has published its latest blog post, announcing the Intel Arc Balanced Builds, an initiative that pairs up Intel Arc GPUs with Intel Core CPUs, creating balanced configurations that match Intel Arc graphics cards to the "best-fitting" Intel Core CPU. Starting at $423 for the GPU and CPU and $899 for the full system, Intel claims these combinations come from thousands of test runs and hundreds of hours in the lab, leading up to 15,000 datapoints and 22 GB of data.

According to Intel's own testing, which includes a wide variety of Intel Core processors in different configurations and games, there is a perfect CPU range for both its entry level Intel Arc A380 graphics card, as well as the Intel Arc A750 and Arc A770 graphics cards. Of course, for those with a big or unlimited budget, there is always the best configuration that money can buy, but making a balanced build is what makes sense for many others.
According to Intel's own data, the Intel Arc A380 hits the CPU limit with a Core i3 and some Core i5 CPUs, while the Intel Arc A750 and the Arc A770 graphics card can hit peak performance with a Core i5 or a Core i7 CPU from the 12th and 13th generations. Intel's own testing also show that with DirectX 12 API, graphics cards like Arc A750 show minimal CPU sensitivity, showing similar results on the Core i5-12400F CPU as with higher-end CPUs.
Intel was also keen to note that the performance of its Arc A-series graphics cards has been improved significantly with driver updates, Game On support, and Xe Super Sampling, especially in DirectX 9, averaging 43 percent more FPS in games like CS:GO.

Intel is teaming up with a bunch of retailers/e-tailers and system builders worldwide, including Amazon, Newegg, Maingear, CyberpowerPC, PCSpecialist, ECOM, and others, where you will be able to find discounted Intel GPU + CPU bundles, as well as fully built systems based on those configurations. You can check out the full list of partners over at Intel's bundle website.

Source: Intel
Add your own comment

17 Comments on Intel Announces Arc GPU and Core CPU Bundles for Balanced Builds

#1
chstamos
I guess a bundle is one way to get rid of unsellable inventory.
Posted on Reply
#3
Bomby569
420$ for an i5 12th gen and a arc a380, does not sound like a great deal at all.
Posted on Reply
#4
dj-electric
I am surprised this has become a thing only now, where were these bundles half a year ago?
My guess is at the same place ARC GPUs were.

Better late than never. Also, I have no doubt this will become cheaper soon.
Posted on Reply
#5
Bwaze
I don't think ARC GPUs were ever planned to be sold so cheaply - but it became inevitable since they were so late to the market.

Right now they're lucky both Nvidia and AMD are completely delusional with pricing - when is the last time we had a regression of price / performance with the launch of new gen? In the whole history of GPUs, almost 30 years? Right, never.
Posted on Reply
#6
Dr. Dro
If only Intel sold their first party models worldwide. Shame that they don't.
Posted on Reply
#7
DarkDreams
Bomby569420$ for an i5 12th gen and a arc a380, does not sound like a great deal at all.
The $423 are for a 12600k and A750 as specified in the footnote.
Posted on Reply
#8
ExcuseMeWtf
Bomby569420$ for an i5 12th gen and a arc a380, does not sound like a great deal at all.
That's not one of the balanced builds he mentions in the video though...

He said for a380 balanced CPU is i3.
Posted on Reply
#9
TheinsanegamerN
An i3/a380 would be great, if they would sell the low profile one here so I could upgrade my SFF PC.

As it stands I'll be force dot go with nvidia's A2000 or rtx 4000 ada SFF (what a dumb name).

The i5/a750 is laughable. An A770/i5 or even a770/i3 would be better balanced, its not that fast of a card.
Posted on Reply
#10
david salsero
Bomby569420$ for an i5 12th gen and a arc a380, does not sound like a great deal at all.
Honestly, in many forums they expect the new AMD ZEN 4 7040 Phoenix that will be the end for many graphics since 90% of the people are enough with RDNA 3
AMD ZEN 4 7040 Phoenix = LPDDR5 + RDNA 3 + USB 4.0 + HDMI 2.1 + AI artificial intelligence with XDNA architecture developed by Xilinx and all at 4nm vs 10nm from Intel
Posted on Reply
#11
TomTomTom
in the 3rd slide, is Intel calling their own GPUs "constrained"? :wtf:
that's a strange way to market your product...
Posted on Reply
#12
Sithaer
TheinsanegamerNThe i5/a750 is laughable. An A770/i5 or even a770/i3 would be better balanced, its not that fast of a card.
I was wondering the same, I have a 12100F paired with a 3060 Ti and at 2560x1080 res I'm pretty much GPU bound in any half decent looking new-ish game especially if I crank up the settings so it should handle a 750/770 just fine.
Posted on Reply
#13
Dr. Dro
david salseroHonestly, in many forums they expect the new AMD ZEN 4 7040 Phoenix that will be the end for many graphics since 90% of the people are enough with RDNA 3
AMD ZEN 4 7040 Phoenix = LPDDR5 + RDNA 3 + USB 4.0 + HDMI 2.1 + AI artificial intelligence with XDNA architecture developed by Xilinx and all at 4nm vs 10nm from Intel
What are you using CPU-accelerated AI for? Not to mention AMD has been disabling it in lower end SKUs.

My CPU supports AVX-VNNI, I'm probably never going to use that as a gamer.
Posted on Reply
#14
sLowEnd
Pairing a 13900K with an Arc card would make for a pretty balanced lopsided build. The 13900K is capable of driving far more powerful cards. It's strange that they'd include it in these slides IMO.
Posted on Reply
#15
Dr. Dro
sLowEndPairing a 13900K with an Arc card would make for a pretty balanced lopsided build. The 13900K is capable of driving far more powerful cards. It's strange that they'd include it in these slides IMO.
I just assume the usual corporate scenario: Marketing intern probably never saw a i9-13900K, knows what it is for, what it does or even cares whether it exists or not. Computer usage likely limited to sparingly using some old beat up HP or Dell laptop and potentially plays some League of Legends in their spare time. Probably just called the Relevant Department™ and asked "Hello Mr. Boss Man Sir, what is the fastest consumer processor the company currently offers" and got back a "i9-13900K" answer back (as they want to preserve the i9-13900KS's status as a low-volume unicorn), then called the Relevant Sector™ and asked "do you confirm that the A770 is the fastest product we offer in this segment", got a yes back, assembled this marketing slide, forwarded it to the Relevant Person™ (who then forwarded it to the PR agency) and went on with their day.
Posted on Reply
#16
TheinsanegamerN
david salseroHonestly, in many forums they expect the new AMD ZEN 4 7040 Phoenix that will be the end for many graphics since 90% of the people are enough with RDNA 3
AMD ZEN 4 7040 Phoenix = LPDDR5 + RDNA 3 + USB 4.0 + HDMI 2.1 + AI artificial intelligence with XDNA architecture developed by Xilinx and all at 4nm vs 10nm from Intel
May people in forums have the IQ of a potato.

These same people said llano's APU would be enough, and it was the end of low end cards. Then richland. Then ryzen 5000. Now ryzen 7000s will be "enough".

It wont be. All the tech that benefits rDNA3 APUs also benefit dGPUs, and the bar will be raised higher. Somehow, this concept eludes many.
SithaerI was wondering the same, I have a 12100F paired with a 3060 Ti and at 2560x1080 res I'm pretty much GPU bound in any half decent looking new-ish game especially if I crank up the settings so it should handle a 750/770 just fine.
Honestly CPUs have been overkill for some time. If you want 60 FPS, an i3 works pretty well in most newer games and the i5 6+4c is overkill. CPUs like the i9 are mostly for epeen these days, and I'd argue they have been for some time now. The only real exceptions are CPUs like the ryzen 3d series, which benefit greatly from the cache and I expect to have sandy bridge tier lifetimes.
Posted on Reply
#17
Sithaer
TheinsanegamerNHonestly CPUs have been overkill for some time. If you want 60 FPS, an i3 works pretty well in most newer games and the i5 6+4c is overkill. CPUs like the i9 are mostly for epeen these days, and I'd argue they have been for some time now. The only real exceptions are CPUs like the ryzen 3d series, which benefit greatly from the cache and I expect to have sandy bridge tier lifetimes.
Aye and I only have a 75Hz monitor and for that this i3 is still enough even in new games if I wasn't GPU limited in the first place.
Older games are a non issue either way and I do play both new/ish and older games.

I'm somewhat considering a CPU ugrade in the locked i5 range later this year but not until I actually find a reason for it for my use case.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 18th, 2024 05:43 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts