Sunday, May 21st 2023

Leaked AMD Radeon RX 7600 GPU Reference Card Design Emerges

We have seen a few examples of custom design/board partner Radeon RX 7600 graphics card models via leaks over the past two weeks - and AMD's alleged reference design has made an appearance this weekend, only fours days prior to the official product launch date (May 25). The leaked images once again come courtesy of VideoCardz - the set of two photos show a dual-fan setup on a mostly black shroud with the company's simple "Radeon" logo positioned near the top - this design seems to be missing an underlining strip of RGB (as seen on the big boy cards).

The picture of the card's flipside depicts a very plain looking backplate. The overall aesthetic is not too far removed from the existing high-end Radeon RX 7900 XT and 7900 XTX reference siblings, although this leaked entry-level offering is tiny in comparison - it is reported to be just under 21 centimeters in length (versus the 7900 XT at 27.6 cm and 7900 XTX at 28.7 cm). The RX 7600 MBA (made-by-AMD) card is said to be two slots wide.
Source: VideoCardz
Add your own comment

72 Comments on Leaked AMD Radeon RX 7600 GPU Reference Card Design Emerges

#26
TheoneandonlyMrK
dgianstefaniI simply asked where the red is. Card looks a bit boring and plain! Not the only one saying this.

Would probably help if the card was powered on for the photo then maybe there is a backlit amd logo or something.
No, there is only on the XTX any RGB backlighting.

Your staff, read a review before spouting rubbish, and re read the thread, you ARE the only one bitchin that a cheap lower end card looks boring because it's not red enough wtaf, sooooo.
Posted on Reply
#27
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
TheoneandonlyMrKNo, there is only on the XTX any RGB backlighting.

Your staff, read a review before spouting rubbish, and re read the thread, you ARE the only one bitchin that a cheap lower end card looks boring because it's not red enough wtaf, sooooo.
Wow you inferred a lot from "where is the red".

:laugh:
Posted on Reply
#28
QuietBob
oxrufiioxoThe most boring part of this card is it likely going to cost more than a 6650XT while performing almost the same.

Quite disappointing performance, TBH, if the leak proves true. Those scores are in the range of an oc'd RX6600XT, with slight improvement in RT:

Posted on Reply
#29
oxrufiioxo
QuietBobQuite disappointing performance, TBH, if the leak proves true. Those scores are in the range of an oc'd RX6600XT, with slight improvement in RT:

I mean if it's 200 usd it's probably ok but near 300 doa.

It's on 6n vs 5n for the larger rdna3 cards so it really has no business being expensive.
Posted on Reply
#30
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
oxrufiioxoI mean if it's 200 usd it's probably ok but near 300 doa.

It's on 6n vs 5n for the larger rdna3 cards so it really has no business being expensive.
This and the 4060 could be highly efficient "good enough" cards in the $2-300 range that most people actually buy if the steam survey says anything.
Posted on Reply
#31
TheoneandonlyMrK
dgianstefaniI simply asked where the red is. Card looks a bit boring and plain! Not the only one saying this.

Would probably help if the card was powered on for the photo then maybe there is a backlit AMD/Radeon logo or something, just to break up the single color design.
See bold , I inferred nothing, you said.

And the steam survey is worth as much as my annual employee survey, if reality was in the place!, some people would be upset, it's easy to invoke the survey, and Nvidia is easily scummy enough to have AI bots running it or shills, they've a few of those too.
Posted on Reply
#32
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
oxrufiioxoAll the color amd could afford on this GPU

Wait, you added red rings! That's clearly a doctored photograph! :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#33
wheresmycar
dgianstefaniI simply asked where the red is. Card looks a bit boring and plain! Not the only one saying this.

Would probably help if the card was powered on for the photo then maybe there is a backlit AMD/Radeon logo or something, just to break up the single color design.
tbh, i'd be happy if they got rid of the red all-together. I like em plain with some heatsink exposure.

More concerning then kids paint, its a 8GB card from a company picking on another for not giving enough.
Posted on Reply
#34
TheoneandonlyMrK
dgianstefaniHere we go.

Difference is, bud, that the cheap FE cards also use metal, i.e. identical design language.
I don't know what you are about but you said this earlier, now to me the 7600 looks just like a smaller two fan version of the Xt you were ok with.

You make no sense they're doing the same design but smaller, one's ok the others not.

And all that Nvidia does looks amazing to you?!.
Posted on Reply
#35
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
wheresmycartbh, i'd be happy if they got rid of the red all-together. I like em plain with some heatsink exposure.

More concerning then kids paint, its a 8GB card from a company picking on another for not giving enough.
I agree, but if no colour, there would be to be some kind of design that breaks up the plain dark box look a bit, some cool angles/industrial design language or something.

I guess if you like the simple look more power to you, I can appreciate that in some designs, less is more.
Posted on Reply
#36
TheoneandonlyMrK
dgianstefaniTheir reference design looks good due to tasteful red accents. This is boring by comparison.

Looks like a plastic generic cooler.

One thing I like with Nvidia founder cards is they all look and feel really good.


Shame AMD didn't continue their nice design of the 7900 series with the cheaper models.
Move on your talking out your arse, consistently.
Posted on Reply
#37
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
wheresmycarMore concerning then kids paint, its a 8GB card from a company picking on another for not giving enough.
Also true, but in this tier I think 8 GB is reasonable.

It's what, a $200 card?
Posted on Reply
#38
3x0
dgianstefaniIt's what, a $200 card?
Yeah, about that... still remains to be confirmed. Wouldn't surprise me if its 250+
Posted on Reply
#39
Lionheart
Dafuq is this thread bruh? All I wanted to see was a small adorable video card.
Posted on Reply
#40
95Viper
Stop the back and forth arguing/bickering.
Stop the insults.
Posted on Reply
#41
N/A
Unfortunately not 5nm process..
Posted on Reply
#42
Vayra86
dgianstefaniTheir reference design looks good due to tasteful red accents. This is boring by comparison.

Looks like a plastic generic cooler.

One thing I like with Nvidia founder cards is they all look and feel really good.


Shame AMD didn't continue their nice design of the 7900 series with the cheaper models.
Still though I have to agree with you, a little red paint somewhere wouldn't have been wrong.

I guess its the tone that sets the tone here :) The italic text could have been left out and you'd have been on the money just the same without baiting. I know, I'm bitching over the comma here, but really its just to show you where the difference lies, in my interpretation of things at least.
95ViperStop the back and forth arguing/bickering.
Stop the insults.
My apologies for putting a finger on that after your post. Not bothered at all if this post gets erased altogether.
Posted on Reply
#43
Mahboi
HD64G$200(best case scenario)-$250(worst one) is the price bracket into which that GPU would have decent vfm and sell well imho. Over that bracker it will fail and AMD will lower its price soon, so it will be stupid of them to not launch it as suggested from day one.
What's sadmusing is that I've been seeing that said on every forum, discord group and social media, and a good bunch of tech people on Youtube. And I agree.
Now watch AMD gleefully shoot itself in the foot and announce $300.
Even at $280 you could make a bad case. They won't let you make a bad case. They'll fk it up full stop. 7900 xt original price style.
Posted on Reply
#44
ymdhis
3x0Yeah, about that... still remains to be confirmed. Wouldn't surprise me if its 250+
$250 for reference you won't be able to buy anywhere, $300 for every add-on board made version, $350 for actual store price IF you can find it in stores, and 400€ if you live in Europe.
Posted on Reply
#46
Chrispy_
I already have a fairly compact 6700XT in the HTPC, but this would have been a candidate for it if it wasn't an 8GB card.

I feel at the rumoured $299, this will be a great GPU for many budget users with older cases that aren't kind to massively oversized cards. In the last few years, midrange, sub-200W GPUs suddenly got big and rare.
Posted on Reply
#47
DrCR
Chrispy_I already have a fairly compact 6700XT in the HTPC, but this would have been a candidate for it if it wasn't an 8GB card.

I feel at the rumoured $299, this will be a great GPU for many budget users with older cases that aren't kind to massively oversized cards. In the last few years, midrange, sub-200W GPUs suddenly got big and rare.
10GB 6700XT XFX is $270 shipped on Amazon right now. I’m not sure why anyone would want to buy this for $30 more instead.
Posted on Reply
#48
Nostras
ymdhis$250 for reference you won't be able to buy anywhere, $300 for every add-on board made version, $350 for actual store price IF you can find it in stores, and 400€ if you live in Europe.
Actually pricing has been very reasonable as of lately. Typically we would get shafted but I'm seeing quite often prices in line with American prices or sometimes even cheaper.
Not always of course...
DrCR10GB 6700XT XFX is $270 shipped on Amazon right now. I’m not sure why anyone would want to buy this for $30 more instead.
That type of card does not exist. A 6700 has 10GB, a 6700XT/6750XT has 12GB. I think you meant the XT-less variant.
Posted on Reply
#49
mama
HD64G$200(best case scenario)-$250(worst one) is the price bracket into which that GPU would have decent vfm and sell well imho. Over that bracker it will fail and AMD will lower its price soon, so it will be stupid of them to not launch it as suggested from day one.
It needs to be $250 or less. An RX 6700 sells for $280 and that has 10GB of memory.
Posted on Reply
#50
Lost_Troll
DrCR10GB 6700XT XFX is $270 shipped on Amazon right now. I’m not sure why anyone would want to buy this for $30 more instead.
I have to agree on this. The RX6600 can be had for 199.99$ and the RX6650 for 249.99$, with the RX6700 sitting at 20.00$ more.

For the RX7600 to sell, it has to be priced around 200.00-225.00$ and the RX7600 XT around 300.00 to 325.00$ if it will have 10 to 12Gb of VRAM, or they will not sell like the newer cards are now. You can get a RX6750 XT for 379.99$ with 12Gb of VRAM, so at 299.99$ for a slower card WITH ONLY 8Gb of VRAM, it will be a hard pass for most people.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 5th, 2025 12:38 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts