Tuesday, July 18th 2023
Leaked AMD Radeon RX 7700 & RX 7800 GPU Benchmarks Emerge
A set of intriguing 3DMark Time Spy benchmark results have been released by hardware leaker All_The_Watts!!—these are alleged to have been produced by prototype Radeon RX 7700 and Radeon RX 7800 graphics cards (rumored to be based on variants of the Navi 32 GPU). The current RDNA 3 lineup of mainstream GPUs is severely lacking in middle ground representation, but Team Red is reported to be working on a number of models to fill in the gap. We expect a number of leaks to emerge as we get closer to a rumored product reveal scheduled for late August (to coincide with Gamescon).
The recently released 3DMark Time Spy scores reveal that the alleged Radeon RX 7700 candidate scored 15,465 points, while the RX 7800 achieved 18,197 points—both running on an unspecified test system. The results (refer to the Tom's Hardware-produced chart placed below) are not going to generate a lot of excitement at this stage when compared to predecessors and some of the competition—evaluation samples are not really expected to be optimized to a great degree. We hope to see finalized products with decent drivers putting in a good appearance and performing better later on this year.
Sources:
Tom's Hardware, All_The_Watts!!
The recently released 3DMark Time Spy scores reveal that the alleged Radeon RX 7700 candidate scored 15,465 points, while the RX 7800 achieved 18,197 points—both running on an unspecified test system. The results (refer to the Tom's Hardware-produced chart placed below) are not going to generate a lot of excitement at this stage when compared to predecessors and some of the competition—evaluation samples are not really expected to be optimized to a great degree. We hope to see finalized products with decent drivers putting in a good appearance and performing better later on this year.
41 Comments on Leaked AMD Radeon RX 7700 & RX 7800 GPU Benchmarks Emerge
I need a game that's AAA, highly popular, well-optimized for, somewhat recent, supports RT, not CPU limited
What would you pick other than Cyberpunk?
It's worth a conversation if you too have no idea then I would say because using one game heavily supported by one OEM is not unbiased
Cyberpunk: 550k
Hogwarts: 150k
RE4: 55k
I think CP is the most-rated game with RT support, which should be a decent proxy for popularity
Cp2077. Something to balance it like Jedi survivor and a compute load from a reputable source, I would have said F@H, it's worthy but not replicable.
www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-radeon-rx-6700-xt/11.html. This is how it's been 2 years ago. 56 FPS on a 6700 XT.
www.techpowerup.com/review/msi-geforce-rtx-3080-suprim-x-12-gb/11.html. One year ago, 50 FPS on a 6700 XT.
My own benchmarks: 69 FPS, ver. 1.6. 57 FPS, ver. 1.63. Settings: 1440p, Ultra, no RT, no FSR.
FSR, though, is completely broken as of now. EXTREME ghost-glitching whilst driving anything at speeds faster than walking ones. Unplayable. Only fixed by a 3rd party modder, CDPR hasn't even bothered to admit the issue.
On the other hand, nVidia GPUs run it faster and faster and faster. And DLSS doesn't break after patches! And works awesome!
Honestly, it feels like both AMD and CDPR are not interested in how AMD GPUs are behaving in this game. That's why I really consider to throw CP2077 outta VSync 60 Hz benchmarking as soon as it is humanly possible.
AMD cannot operate under lower expenses than its competitors but is obviously the brand with tiny market share.
AMD's CEO is wrong and must change.
MP: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Dota 2, PUBG: BATTLEGROUNDS, Apex Legends & Call of Duty®: Modern Warfare® II | Warzone™
SP: Grand Theft Auto V, Cities: Skylines, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Fallout 4 & Stellaris
Also test the efficency with lower power targets. Performance per Watt sweet spot. Nobody cares about overclocking, esp. since there is nothing to gain for most games. Power consumtion, heat & noise is way more important to most of the folks out there. ;)