Tuesday, September 5th 2023
Official AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT & RX 7700 XT Performance Figures Leaked
Argentina's HD Tecnología site has obtained and published AMD's official data outlining the performance prowess of the soon-to-be released Radeon RX 7800 XT & RX 7700 XT GPUs, when stacked up against their closest rivals—NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and RTX 4070 12 GB. Team Red could have "cherry-picked" some of this information, and presented resultant performance charts during the grand unveiling of their mid-range RDNA 3 cards at last month's Gamescom press event. HD Tecnología claims that the fuzzy batch of screengrabs were obtained from an official review guide, they chose to not share pages containing precise details of system specifications. An embargo imposed on media outlets is set to be lifted tomorrow, which coincides with the launch of AMD's Navi 32-based contenders.
The test system was running games within a DirectX 12 environment, possibly at maximum settings—general hardware specs included an non-specific AMD Ryzen 7000-series CPU coupled with DDR5 memory on unidentified AM5 motherboard. VideoCardz's abbreviated analysis of the numbers stated: "In summary, without ray tracing, the Radeon RX 7800 XT outperforms the GeForce RTX 4070 by almost 7% on average, while with ray tracing enabled, it maintains a slight 0.5% lead. Conversely, the RX 7700 XT exhibits 16% higher performance over the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB. However, the presence of ray tracing can tip the scales slightly in NVIDIA's favor, resulting in an 8.5% lead over the AMD GPU."
Here is a VideoCardz-produced summation of these figures:
Radeon RX 7800 XT 16 GB versus RTX 4070 12 GB
Sources:
HDTecnologia, Wccftech, VideoCardz, Tom's Hardware
The test system was running games within a DirectX 12 environment, possibly at maximum settings—general hardware specs included an non-specific AMD Ryzen 7000-series CPU coupled with DDR5 memory on unidentified AM5 motherboard. VideoCardz's abbreviated analysis of the numbers stated: "In summary, without ray tracing, the Radeon RX 7800 XT outperforms the GeForce RTX 4070 by almost 7% on average, while with ray tracing enabled, it maintains a slight 0.5% lead. Conversely, the RX 7700 XT exhibits 16% higher performance over the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB. However, the presence of ray tracing can tip the scales slightly in NVIDIA's favor, resulting in an 8.5% lead over the AMD GPU."
Radeon RX 7800 XT 16 GB versus RTX 4070 12 GB
- Raster: +6.9%
- Ray tracing: -11.6%
- Average: +0.5%
- Raster: +15.9%
- Ray tracing: -5.4%
- AVG: +8.5%
67 Comments on Official AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT & RX 7700 XT Performance Figures Leaked
It's like claiming that a new CPU with AVX-512 support is 1000% faster and has 1000% higher IPC than a CPU which doesn't have that AVX-512 instruction.
You don't know what you are talking about..
RDNA3 is better at everything including RT but it's also not better at RT ? It's like your using anti-logic.
I don't need to see your "data" while I saw data from persons that are actual experts that prove you are completely wrong, which you ignored, aside from my own findings and logic that already dismantled your "logic". The only irony here is that you can't see that I'm fed up with this discussion hence not reading your wall of texts.
Question is how many people have to disagree with you until you accept you're wrong.
www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-radeon-rx-7600/34.html
These are the parts of a bigger cake, not the couple of different cakes.
I know that argument by analogy is not an argument but I want to make my own statement more comprehensible. Say, you got a car1 and a car2. A car2 is faster on sand. They tell you it's faster on sand but it has nothing to do with its ability to ride on sand alone, it's only because it has a stronger engine. Its wheels, tyres, and the rest of drivetrain and whatnot hasn't been optimised for sand better than those of car1. Just a better engine.
Same situation is going on with RDNA2 and RDNA3.One who is actually able to prove it without calling me an idiot, providing me with anything which can help me with changing my mind and without arguments to authority which look so made up it's probably the case the Barbie herself is more real than your "experts."
RDNA 2 GPUs have lower performance loss, which means RDNA 3 doesn't improve the general RT performance of AMD's architectures:
www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-radeon-rx-7900-xtx/34.html
www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-radeon-rx-7900-xtx/40.html
Quote w1zzard: "RT performance improved". Guess some people can not be convinced once they are set on their nonsensical path.
Yes, the architectural changes between RDNA2 and RDNA3 are not huge.
you can compare RX 6600 Xt to the RX 7600 as they have the exact same of everything. The RT efficiency increase is anywhere from 3-13% & depends on the game.
Any real pricing leaks in the US in regards to the 7800xt so far? Im running out of GPUs and PSUs lately. Hoping to restock with something intriguing sooner rather than later.
Performance: a tiny bit better than RX 6800, average 3% advantage with CP2077 and a couple (literally couple) other games where RDNA3 mops the floor with RDNA2.
I think the most interesting numbers will be power consumption (esp. underclocked). Let's see if they made any advancements in the meanwhile or if it will get roasted by the old gen 6800 XT.