Tuesday, October 17th 2023

NVIDIA Readies GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, and RTX 4080 SUPER

NVIDIA is rumored to be working on a refresh of the higher end of its GeForce RTX 40-series "Ada" series, according to hongxing2020, a reliable source with NVIDIA leaks. The company could be bringing back the SUPER brand extension that it introduced with the RTX 20-series. As many as three SKUs are on the radar—GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, and the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER.

There is no word on when the company plans to release these, or what their specifications are, but we can certainly speculate. The current RTX 4080, while based on the AD103 silicon, doesn't max it out—it uses 76 out of 80 SM (streaming multiprocessors) available on the silicon, but we doubt if those extra 4 SM could drive up enough performance to make a whole new SKU, especially given that the 256-bit memory bus of the AD103 is maxed out. We predict that the RTX 4080 SUPER could be based on the larger AD102 silicon that physically has 144 SM that the current RTX 4090 uses 128 out of. NVIDIA has the opportunity to pick an SM count such as, say, 96. AD102 also has a wider 384-bit memory bus, giving NVIDIA the option of either giving the RTX 4080 SUPER the same 24 GB memory configuration as the RTX 4090, or even 20 GB, across a 320-bit memory bus.
As for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER (an oddly named SKU that combines both the Ti and SUPER brand extensions), considering that the current RTX 4070 Ti maxes out the AD104 silicon (60 SM), it stands to reason that this new SKU could be based on AD103, with a lower SM count than the 76 of the RTX 4080. It remains to be seen if NVIDIA utilizes the full 256-bit memory bus. As for the RTX 4070 SUPER, there exists a rather wide gap between the current RTX 4070 Ti and the current RTX 4070. While the RTX 4070 Ti uses all 60 SM on the AD104, the RTX 4070 only uses 46. This gives NVIDIA the opportunity to get closer to the RTX 4070 Ti in SM counts, and bolster against AMD's Radeon RX 7800 XT.
Sources: hongxing2020 (Twitter), VideoCardz
Add your own comment

76 Comments on NVIDIA Readies GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, and RTX 4080 SUPER

#51
Macro Device
lexluthermiesterYour graphs do not match current gen cards.
Implying they could.

The point is the only generation with "Super" SKUs had no "Super" SKU faster than their non-Super predecessor by more than 15 percent. We're currently into 2023 and even 5 percent FPS/$ gain is enough to make "Super" Ada SKUs more feasible than their RDNA2/3 competition all around. 8 percent would be the ultimate hard counter. There is no point for Huang to do anything better than that.
Posted on Reply
#52
PapaTaipei
wolfSo it's all speculation and guesswork..

I'll be interested when specs and pricing are confirmed, I can speculate all I like right now about what configurations and pricing could be, likely fairly accurately too, but it wouldn't be news.
It's still interesting for a lot of buyers. Including me. There are good reasons to belive a refresh is on the way, and with such good news we can wait a couple of months to make a choice on a 1K euros ballpark GPU. Btw ppl whining about too many SKUs dont make any sens, you want to sell as many chips as possible, even the ones with defective SMs that's totally normal.
Posted on Reply
#53
Dr. Dro
ChaitanyaThis rumour is no surprise given this brand does have a history of launching too many SKUs every generation and screwing over the customers with more you buy more you save philosophy.
No one's being screwed over, at least not any more than AMD is screwing customers with that 6750 GRE of theirs, that come in both RX 6700-equivalent and RX 6700 XT equivalents at roughly half their MSRP... Now that's some good screwing they're doing to their value minded customers... if only these weren't 3 year old cards already.

Ada's been around for a year, if a refresh isn't released within the next 3 to 6 months, it may be a generation that won't receive one altogether. I fully expect Blackwell 50 series to ship within 1 year to 18 months from now.
Posted on Reply
#54
R0H1T
Who didn't see this coming, unless you're probably blind as bat :shadedshu:

Also not sure if anyone brought this up, but did JHH have this in mind when of thought of RTX ~ Resiniferatoxin
Posted on Reply
#55
PapaTaipei
R0H1TWho didn't see this coming, unless you're probably blind as bat :shadedshu:

Also not sure if anyone brought this up, but did JHH have this in mind when of thought of RTX ~ Resiniferatoxin
Wow, I just read that wiki page. Very interesting.
Posted on Reply
#56
cvaldes
It's important to stress that SUPER is a marketing term not an engineering one. In no way does SUPER equal a certain percentage boost. However Nvidia marketing used the SUPER descriptor on a previous generation doesn't require them to use it the same way again. As most of us are well aware, Nvidia doesn't maintain any sort of consistency between generations.

Of course, GPUs are measured and quantified by a bunch of numerical metrics (cores, frequencies, etc.) so Nvidia really can't just slap the SUPER moniker on the exact same part. About the only given is that the SUPER SKU will slightly outperform the normal model and that it will be more expensive.

That's pretty much all anyone sane can expect. LOL, maybe the only honest thing the SUPER adjective is good for is the price.

:):p:D
Posted on Reply
#57
Prima.Vera
So 4070ti Super vs 4080 ?
Is this a joke?
Posted on Reply
#58
lexluthermiester
Beginner Micro DeviceThe point is the only generation with "Super" SKUs had no "Super" SKU faster than their non-Super predecessor by more than 15 percent.
Taking your suggestion, if we look at the 2000 standard to the 2000 "super" models then to the "ti" models, the jump in performance is about 15% each jump. But that was the 2000 series. We're two generations ahead now. The "ti" models of the 4000 series are a consistent 20% faster than the non-ti models. Logically, we should reasonably expect that these new "super" models should be a similar jump of 20%, even though they did the "super" and "ti" naming convention backwards from the 2000 series.
Prima.VeraSo 4070ti Super vs 4080 ?
No. It'll be the 4070Super not the 4070ti Super.
Prima.VeraIs this a joke?
NVidia is just selling off binned dies that don't meet the required specs for a certain model range, but can fit somewhere inbetween. So for example:

They have dies that didn't qualify as a full 4090, so they're going to bin them as a 4080Super.
They have dies that didn't qualify as a full 4080, but are better than a 4070ti, so they're making a 4070Super.
They have dies that didn't qualify as a full 4070, but they're better than a 4060ti, so they're making a 4060Super.
There is even more fine-grain examples than just these as well.

This is a binning practice we've all seen for decades. It's not new and if we understand what is really going on, not at all surprising. It's just standard business. Nature of the machine, as it were.
Posted on Reply
#59
N/A
There isn't going to be a 4080 based on 102. Potentially a 4070 Super with 8704 cuda and 4080 super full AD103.
the binned 102 are in RTX 5000 Ada and those are not necessarily a bad batch of dies just laser cut.
Posted on Reply
#60
Cheeseball
Not a Potato
Pretty sure if ever there was a RTX 4070 Super, it would definitely be in-between the 4070 and 4070 Ti as the Ti moniker is usually the top version (e.g. 2080 vs. 2080 Super vs. 2080 Ti). So almost guaranteed to be 192-bit again and possibly $650?

Perhaps this is for the mobile line up as there is a huge performance gap (like 40% to 50% faster) between the RTX 4070 and RTX 4080. Maybe this is where a 4070 Super would fit in.
Posted on Reply
#61
Camm
Nvidia would be better served dropping prices on 4070/Ti and creating a SUPER tier above or between the Ti.

Trying to insert a Ti SUPER is likely just to do more brand damage going into the future.
Posted on Reply
#62
PapaTaipei
N/AThere isn't going to be a 4080 based on 102. Potentially a 4070 Super with 8704 cuda and 4080 super full AD103.
the binned 102 are in RTX 5000 Ada and those are not necessarily a bad batch of dies just laser cut.
RTX 5000? Your comment make 0 sens.
CammNvidia would be better served dropping prices on 4070/Ti and creating a SUPER tier above or between the Ti.

Trying to insert a Ti SUPER is likely just to do more brand damage going into the future.
I don't think they care about brand damage since they have a monopoly. Besides if people are ready to pay 1K for a GPU why would they lower their prices?
Posted on Reply
#63
gffermari
People buy nVidia gpus no matter what. But the interest has declined since the prices have been stable for nearly a year.

The supers will bring the interest back.
It doesn’t matter if they are good or vfm.
Posted on Reply
#64
N/A
PapaTaipeiRTX 5000? Your comment make 0 sens.
Quadro Ada generation GPU Variant AD102 / 12800 Shading Units
Posted on Reply
#65
lexluthermiester
N/AQuadro Ada generation GPU Variant AD102 / 12800 Shading Units
Those are not RTX 5000.
Posted on Reply
#66
ratirt
How was it with previous gens. Is super better than Ti? 2000 series super stack somewhere between Ti and regular(2080 Ti and 2080) right?
All in all it all comes down to price.
Posted on Reply
#68
PapaTaipei
N/AQuadro Ada generation GPU Variant AD102 / 12800 Shading Units
My bad, sorry.
Posted on Reply
#69
ratirt
lexluthermiesterThey have dies that didn't qualify as a full 4080, but are better than a 4070ti, so they're making a 4070Super.
I thought Super has lower performance than a Ti version.
The Ti Super is a new creation though.
Posted on Reply
#70
lexluthermiester
ratirtHow was it with previous gens. Is super better than Ti? 2000 series super stack somewhere between Ti and regular(2080 Ti and 2080) right?
All in all it all comes down to price.
With the Geforce 2000 series it went 20X0, 20X0Super, 20X0ti. It would seem they're doing things in a different order this time.
AssimilatorDo research before being rude.

www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/rtx-5000-ada-generation.c4152
Well crap. I thought they were naming the workstation card something else(along the line of A5XXX). This begs the question: What are the next gen Geforce RTX card going to be named?
ratirtI thought Super has lower performance than a Ti version.
The Ti Super is a new creation though.
They did that with the RTX 2000 series, but as they have already done the "ti" variants, it's only logical for the "super" card to be up next. Of course, with NVidia's janky-asre naming scheme, who knows at all...
Posted on Reply
#71
Chrispy_
The vanilla 4060 is the model that needs the most love from a "Super" refresh, but it's already using the full AD107 die so there's no room to grow. 24 SMs on a puny 128-bit bus is why last-gen mobile parts are doing better than the desktop 4060; Laptop 3060's get 30 SMs on a 192-bit bus, and they get 25W more power. The 4060 is a step backwards in all ways except energy efficiency, and Nvidia aren't even responsible for that bit.

This is the problem with Nvidia selling their lowest-tier part with a mid-tier name, they've f*cked the naming scheme for refreshes. Unless they use AD106, there's no way to stop the vanilla 4060 Super from being a waste of effort, as it'll just be a 5-10% clock speed bump at the cost of efficiency.
Posted on Reply
#72
John974
Waiting for the ultra to come back, never understood the "super".

Back in the day you had the vanilla, ti and ultra.
Also liked the vanilla, gt and gtx.

4080 super ti ultra extreme might be new and great for marketing?
Posted on Reply
#73
Unregistered
Super is just the new lingo they use when it's a refresh - ironically, not so super.
Posted on Edit | Reply
#74
stimpy88
Double-ClickSuper is just the new lingo they use when it's a refresh - ironically, not so super.
It's to con certain customers who think they will be ahead of the curve with all these UE5 and high RT games. UE5=RTX5, the quiet part nVidia is certainly never going to say out loud.
Posted on Reply
#75
SOAREVERSOR
John974Waiting for the ultra to come back, never understood the "super".

Back in the day you had the vanilla, ti and ultra.
Also liked the vanilla, gt and gtx.

4080 super ti ultra extreme might be new and great for marketing?
They have NEVER been consistent. But then again no PC company has been. If you look at the 6800 series it was 6800, 6800gt, 6800ultra. But even that didn't hold. ASUS released a 6800 but slapped the 256mb of GDDR3 onto it of a GT and called it GAMER (gamers are suckers) tossed in an LED and was off to the races. Then there was the 6800 Ultra Extreme, and then the 6800 Ultra 512mb. There were even rogue 6800gt cards that only shipped with 128mb of gddr rather than the 256 gddr3.

There is utterly no point in trying to make sense of consumer PC hardware naming especially when it comes to gaming. The companies know they are marketing to idiots, especially in the DYI crowd, and so it makes no sense at all. It's all just marketing gibberish for e-peen. Because most people who buy a GPU just go out and buy the most expensive nvidia card they can afford with the most convoluted name.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 12:29 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts