Wednesday, November 22nd 2023

Sam Altman to Return as OpenAI CEO, Days After Board's Decision for Removal

Over the past few days, the OpenAI drama has continued to give more details about the relationship between OpenAI's board, employees, and even the executive layer of the company. As we have covered previously, the OpenAI board on last Friday, November 17, fired the company's CEO, Sam Altman. Over the weekend, Mr. Altman was approached by Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and offered to lead the AI unit within the Redmond giant; however, the employment was not yet finalized. Today, we learned that Sam Altman has reached an agreement with the board to return to OpenAI along with Greg Brockman and many other OpenAI employees.

After starting a wave of posts on the X/Twitter platform saying, "OpenAI is nothing without its people," the employees of OpenAI signed a letter requesting the board to bring back Sam Altman. With the deal now happening, employees are expected to continue working for OpenAI under Sam Altman's leadership. The new initial board of OpenAI is composed of Bret Taylor (Chair), Larry Summers, and Adam D'Angelo. Sam Altman said in a post on X: "i love openai, and everything i've done over the past few days has been in service of keeping this team and its mission together. when i decided to join msft on sun evening, it was clear that was the best path for me and the team. with the new board and w satya's support, i'm looking forward to returning to openai, and building on our strong partnership with msft." While Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella added "We are encouraged by the changes to the OpenAI board. We believe this is a first essential step on a path to more stable, well-informed, and effective governance. Sam, Greg, and I have talked and agreed they have a key role to play along with the OAI leadership team in ensuring OAI continues to thrive and build on its mission. We look forward to building on our strong partnership and delivering the value of this next generation of AI to our customers and partners."
Source: OpenAI (X/Twitter)
Add your own comment

41 Comments on Sam Altman to Return as OpenAI CEO, Days After Board's Decision for Removal

#26
Vayra86
Selayawhile i would fundamentally agree to this i have no hopes that government regulation wouldn't make this shitshow even far worse. brave new world indeed.
Government shares the interests of a healthy and functional society with us, or they rule over a bunch of misfits. So yeah, gov regulation is preferable without any sliver of doubt.
cvaldesI'm pretty sure Ilya identifies as male.

It makes one wonder how carefully TPU readers have been following this drama. Admittedly the media has done a piss poor job covering this circus.

It is almost as if this whole episode was written by AI.

:):p:D
:lovetpu:
Bingo. Software design shapes us. We have no idea of the implications. The going principle in the leading edge of tech and in development is to innovate, fail, learn, try again, until you succeed. That's what AI does. Its what might have been tried here.
Posted on Reply
#27
shoskunk
So Microsoft.. Microsoft... knowing the volatility of the space, and with a bevy of lawyers on hand, would offer this guy a job to run AI for them without a clause in the acceptance letter?

Where's that part of the story? Anywhere!?

Nope..
Posted on Reply
#28
mechtech
I wonder if he got the golden parachute and then a signing bonus?? Lol
Posted on Reply
#29
Evildead666
Gooigi's Exaaaaaaaaaaah yes…i can’t wait for the movie about this to come out. the shit show that was endured definitely was a read and would need a visual. i wonder who would play as sam.
The Movie ?

This is surly worthy of a Broadway Musical rendition. :)
/s
Posted on Reply
#30
Selaya
Vayra86Government shares the interests of a healthy and functional society with us, or they rule over a bunch of misfits. So yeah, gov regulation is preferable without any sliver of doubt.
[ ... ]
wher r u from, utopia????
Posted on Reply
#31
Unregistered
Vayra86All it truly confirms is one thing; regulate the shit out of these ratholes.
They influence society far too much to go unregulated as they are. We missed the boat with social media, let's not repeat that. We regulate banks as they are critical infrastructure, but the social discourse is far more critical. We need some form of checks and balances here, I don't even know exactly what or how, but it being complicated doesn't mean its not necessary.
Posted on Edit | Reply
#32
Vayra86
Selayawher r u from, utopia????
Reality, and information not built on social media news feeds.

I won't deny regulation is easy or perfect. But its better. Crypto is a good example - its a market that doesn't like regulators stepping in, but they do, and as they do, voices in the crypto market are raised that its actually possibly a good thing for it, because it elevates the trust in the market, and for currencies and trade, trust is everything. The lack of regulation is the whole reason crypto is in the shitter and will be there for some unforeseen period of time; sure you can speculate with it, but beyond that? Pointless exercise.
Posted on Reply
#33
Selaya
well you've got it wrong then, there's maybe three governments that do about as little as they possibly can to ensure unfairness is just contained at a level that doesn't lead to a popular revolution while about half of the remaining somewhat appear to be doing said thing (but not really)

that's a far cry from
Government shares the interests of a healthy and functional society [ ... ]
but anyways, i digress
Posted on Reply
#34
thesmokingman
Wow, there was a huge letter sent to Musk whom then shared it on X. It's not being reported on by major media, no surprise considering it hit the air in the early AM. Otherwise it's been hosted on the archive. It's a huge call out on Altman and Brockman, beware though of big time douche examples. Altman then looks like a perfect fit at MSFT.

web.archive.org/web/20231121225252/https://gist.github.com/Xe/32d7bc436e401f3323ae77e7e242f858
We provide concrete examples of Sam and Greg's dishonesty & manipulation including:
  • Sam's demand for researchers to delay reporting progress on specific "secret" research initiatives, which were later dismantled for failing to deliver sufficient results quickly enough. Those who questioned this practice were dismissed as "bad culture fits" and even terminated, some just before Thanksgiving 2019.
  • Greg's use of discriminatory language against a gender-transitioning team member. Despite many promises to address this issue, no meaningful action was taken, except for Greg simply avoiding all communication with the affected individual, effectively creating a hostile work environment. This team member was eventually terminated for alleged under-performance.
  • Sam directing IT and Operations staff to conduct investigations into employees, including Ilya, without the knowledge or consent of management.
  • Sam's discreet, yet routine exploitation of OpenAI's non-profit resources to advance his personal goals, particularly motivated by his grudge against Elon following their falling out.
  • The Operations team's tacit acceptance of the special rules that applied to Greg, navigating intricate requirements to avoid being blacklisted.
  • Brad Lightcap's unfulfilled promise to make public the documents detailing OpenAI's capped-profit structure and the profit cap for each investor.
  • Sam's incongruent promises to research projects for compute quotas, causing internal distrust and infighting.
Posted on Reply
#35
Icon Charlie
EternitUnfortunately it is already too late. And with the new board OpenAI is de facto Microsoft subsidiary.
I agree with this comment as I looked a bit harder on the situation.
Posted on Reply
#36
DeathtoGnomes
cvaldesI'm pretty sure Ilya identifies as male.

It makes one wonder how carefully TPU readers have been following this drama. Admittedly the media has done a piss poor job covering this circus.

It is almost as if this whole episode was written by AI.

:):p:D
:lovetpu:
I think the headlines and real story should be about the board of directors, who is out not just who is in now leaving Sam Altmans return as a secondary story here.
Posted on Reply
#37
thesmokingman
DeathtoGnomesI think the headlines and real story should be about the board of directors, who is out not just who is in now leaving Sam Altmans return as a secondary story here.
The board did their job though, they tried to protect the mission. Let's not forget MSFT is also a major media company and notice the lack of reporting on why Altman was removed. The narrative is now about how whacked the board was and how much they screwed up when in reality Altman crossed so many lines and the board had had enough. If you dig into Altman, you'll see this isn't the first time he's been straight up fired for being a douche and self serving, y combinator anyone?
Posted on Reply
#38
cvaldes
thesmokingmanThe board did their job though, they tried to protect the mission. Let's not forget MSFT is also a major media company and notice the lack of reporting on why Altman was removed. The narrative is now about how whacked the board was and how much they screwed up when in reality Altman crossed so many lines and the board had had enough. If you dig into Altman, you'll see this isn't the first time he's been straight up fired for being a douche and self serving, y combinator anyone?
This whole episode illustrates how pathetic tech media journalism has become (not just TechPowerUp).

No one has seriously asked how Altman's firing happened. Sure, he was fired but all the articles basically said "the board" fired him?

Assuming it required a majority, who were the board members who fired Altman? What were their backgrounds? What are their connections with Microsoft? Why did they leave the board? Where are they now? Who selected the new board members? What are their affiliation with Microsoft and Altman?

Somewhere on Sand Hill Road, someone knows all these answers.
Posted on Reply
#39
Minus Infinity
The whole thing was staged. OpenAI wanted some free publicity and everyone talking about them. No one was fired, no one was walking.
Posted on Reply
#40
DeathtoGnomes
thesmokingmanThe board did their job though, they tried to protect the mission. Let's not forget MSFT is also a major media company and notice the lack of reporting on why Altman was removed. The narrative is now about how whacked the board was and how much they screwed up when in reality Altman crossed so many lines and the board had had enough. If you dig into Altman, you'll see this isn't the first time he's been straight up fired for being a douche and self serving, y combinator anyone?
Im gonmna go on alimb here and there was bad blood betwen certain board members and altman that just needed an excuse to fire him. Personalities aside, we will never really know exactly what the conditions were but I will ass-u-me the board members that left was a major role in the ongoing shenanigans. It wouldnt be the first time a CEO was stabbed in the back by board members want to install a more pliable lackey. MS's role is insignificant which is also IMO.
cvaldesThis whole episode illustrates how pathetic tech media journalism has become (not just TechPowerUp).

No one has seriously asked how Altman's firing happened. Sure, he was fired but all the articles basically said "the board" fired him?

Assuming it required a majority, who were the board members who fired Altman? What were their backgrounds? What are their connections with Microsoft? Why did they leave the board? Where are they now? Who selected the new board members? What are their affiliation with Microsoft and Altman?

Somewhere on Sand Hill Road, someone knows all these answers.
Those are some interesting questions indeed, one more, how long has the conflicts been going on. If it dates back to the beginning we could speculate that it was a firing waiting to happen, for any plausible excuse.
Minus InfinityThe whole thing was staged. OpenAI wanted some free publicity and everyone talking about them. No one was fired, no one was walking.
I've got a tin hat you can borrow.
Posted on Reply
#41
thesmokingman
DeathtoGnomesIm gonmna go on alimb here and there was bad blood betwen certain board members and altman that just needed an excuse to fire him. Personalities aside, we will never really know exactly what the conditions were but I will ass-u-me the board members that left was a major role in the ongoing shenanigans. It wouldnt be the first time a CEO was stabbed in the back by board members want to install a more pliable lackey. MS's role is insignificant which is also IMO.


Those are some interesting questions indeed, one more, how long has the conflicts been going on. If it dates back to the beginning we could speculate that it was a firing waiting to happen, for any plausible excuse.


I've got a tin hat you can borrow.
Read my post above. OpenAI employees wrote a letter to the board listing out many serious issues with Altman going back to 2019. The board is therew as a checks and balances system, they're not there to pander to the CEO but to keep him/her in check. OpenAI has now replaced those board members with "yes" men. This it turns out is a fine result for MSFT and Altman. Hell going back to before OpenAI, Altman was doing the same shit. He was double dipping at Y Combinator which is insane considering it's a start up funder.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 10:29 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts