Monday, December 25th 2023

ASUS GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Dual OC Snapped—Goodbye 8-pin

Here are some of the first pictures of the ASUS GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Dual OC, the company's close-to-MSRP custom-design implementation of the upcoming RTX 4070 SUPER, which is expected to be announced on January 8, with reviews and retail availability a week later. The card very closely resembles the design of the RTX 4070 Dual OC, but with one major difference—the single 8-pin PCIe power connector makes way for a 16-pin 12VHPWR. Considering that the ASUS Dual OC series tends to come with a nominal factory OC at power limits matching NVIDIA reference, this is the first sign that the RTX 4070 SUPER in general might have typical graphics power (TGP) above what a single 8-pin could fulfill, and so we've given a 12VHPWR, just like every RTX 4070 Ti. The cards will include an NVIDIA-designed adapter that converts two 8-pin PCIe to a 12VHPWR, with its signal pins set to tell the graphics card that it can deliver 300 W of continuous power.

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is based on the same AD104 silicon as the RTX 4070 and RTX 4070 Ti, with its ASIC code rumored to be "AD104-350." The SKU allegedly enables 56 out of 60 streaming multiprocessors (SM) present on the silicon, giving it 7,168 out of 7,680 CUDA cores. This is a big increase from the 5,888 CUDA cores (46 SM) that the vanilla RTX 4070 is configured with. The memory subsystem is expected to be unchanged from the RTX 4070 and RTX 4070 Ti—12 GB of 21 Gbps GDDR6X across a 192-bit memory interface; leaving NVIDIA with one possible lever, the ROP count. While the RTX 4070 Ti has 80 ROPs, the RTX 4070 has 64. It remains to be seen how many the RTX 4070 SUPER gets. Its rumored TGP of 225 W is behind the switch to 12VHPWR connectors.
Sources: momomo_us (Twitter), VideoCardz
Add your own comment

54 Comments on ASUS GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Dual OC Snapped—Goodbye 8-pin

#51
Vayra86
chrcolukWow the industry Nvidia is sure being stubborn.

What would happen if reviewers collectively refused to review any GPU with the 16pin connector?

Also why wasnt this bumped to 16 gigs, its just rude at this point.
FTFY

AMD isn't launching anything with this POS just yet
And the connector is still in open beta go figure. Yep, we're beta testing power connections too now.
Posted on Reply
#52
OkieDan
The new connector sucks, they could have made something much more reliable, something like a modified XT60 connector.
Posted on Reply
#53
londiste
OkieDanThe new connector sucks, they could have made something much more reliable, something like a modified XT60 connector.
Out of curiosity, why XT60 as an example? The connector itself should generally be specced to 30A (for 12V then 360W), two wires (360W implies at least 14-gauge) and thick wires make bending quite a bit more problematic. The size is a bit smaller than 12v6x2 but not by that much. The point was purely the connection reliability due to large pins and contact surface?
Posted on Reply
#54
OkieDan
londisteOut of curiosity, why XT60 as an example? The connector itself should generally be specced to 30A (for 12V then 360W), two wires (360W implies at least 14-gauge) and thick wires make bending quite a bit more problematic. The size is a bit smaller than 12v6x2 but not by that much. The point was purely the connection reliability due to large pins and contact surface?
I said XT60 because it can handle over 600 Watts which was the point of using a new connector. The silicon jacketed wires that are typically used with these connectors are very flexible for their size.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 21st, 2024 09:03 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts