Sunday, August 4th 2024

Kingston Quietly Adds the NV3 to its SSD Lineup

Kingston's NV2 NVMe SSD has been a popular budget choice that has offered some of the best price/performance ratio in its segment of the market. Now, Kingston has quietly added its replacement, the NV3 to its website and that entails a wide range of upgrades over the NV2. The Kingston NV2 came in a range of different variations with multiple different controllers and NAND types and so far the company hasn't revealed which controller or what NAND the NV3 will feature. However, the company lists 3D NAND with a sequential read speeds of 6,000 MB/s for the 1 TB and up SKUs which is a huge improvement over the NV2 which topped out at 3,500 MB/s. Write speeds top out at 5,000 MB/s, but this is limited to the 2 and 4 TB SKUs, but it's nearly twice that of the 2 TB NV2 SKU. The 1 TB SKU is also seeing almost a doubling in terms of write speeds over the NV2. The 500 GB SKU is seeing more modest performance improvements, but it's still getting a decent performance uplift.

Initially, Kingston will launch 500 GB, 1 TB and 2 TB SKUs, with the 4 TB SKU following in Q4 this year. Endurance remains the same as for the NV2, with the NV3 starting out at 160 TBW for the 500 GB SKU, which then doubles for each increase in size and tops out at 1280 TBW for the 4 TB SKU. Kingston has as yet to officially announce the drive, but some online retailers claim to be able to ship the NV3 in four to five days time, suggesting that the launch is imminent. Pricing appears to start at US$50 for the 500 GB SKU, which increases to US$70 for the 1 TB SKU, with the 2 TB SKU jumping to US$139 from the same retailer. This places the NV3 slightly higher than the current retail price of the NV2, which is hardly a surprise, considering it delivers better performance. All SKUs come with a three year warranty.
Source: Kingston
Add your own comment

29 Comments on Kingston Quietly Adds the NV3 to its SSD Lineup

#26
bonehead123
trsttteYeah this can go rot in a garbage pile. Competition in the market is necessary and very desirable but we don't need 20 companies repackaging the same chips with unreliable specs sheets.

For me it's either first party - that is WD, Samsung, Kioxia, SKhynix, Crucial - or nothing.
#WD4Me4EVA#

'nuff said :D
Posted on Reply
#27
jpvalverde85
If i have to guess, it'll be slower than the previous ones! NV1 was unimpressive, NV2 is garbage (i can sense the difference just using the OS between an OEM SSD and this piece of crap), so NV3 probably will be dog slow with penta cell flash!
Posted on Reply
#28
trsttte
WirkoI'm not aware of any manufacturer degrading the specifications after the launch. Have there been any?
I should have simply said specs instead of spec sheets because in reality all spec sheets are super vague to the point they can change the entire BOM and the spec sheet still being valid. But yeah, it's pretty frequent for this type of manufacturers to release an initial version of the drive for reviews and then changing everything about it without any notice or model change, Adata and Kingston being recurring offenders.

For me it just doesn't make sense to save 10$ on a Kingston NV2 with random components over a WD SN580 or a Crucial P3 that will keep the components consistent over the product lifetime and have better warranties. This NV3 is no different, at 70$ for the 1TB version you can buy a WD SN770 for the same price, or even the SN850X for 85$, just 15$ more - less than having dinner at a restaurant in most big cities.
Posted on Reply
#29
Wirko
trsttteI should have simply said specs instead of spec sheets because in reality all spec sheets are super vague to the point they can change the entire BOM and the spec sheet still being valid. But yeah, it's pretty frequent for this type of manufacturers to release an initial version of the drive for reviews and then changing everything about it without any notice or model change, Adata and Kingston being recurring offenders.

For me it just doesn't make sense to save 10$ on a Kingston NV2 with random components over a WD SN580 or a Crucial P3 that will keep the components consistent over the product lifetime and have better warranties. This NV3 is no different, at 70$ for the 1TB version you can buy a WD SN770 for the same price, or even the SN850X for 85$, just 15$ more - less than having dinner at a restaurant in most big cities.
All are super vague? Please pay more attention to specific models, such as those that I listed above. I bought a KC3000 (2TB) last month, it was 130 € on amazon.de on prime day, couldn't pass it. These SSDs have a known controller, 1600 TBW, and TLC declared in the specs (but QLC never comes close to that TBW anyway). NAND was from Micron at launch, later from Kioxia too (supposedly inferior but it's the same type as in the SN850X). I got Micron but wouldn't mind either brand.

On the other hand, the P3 Plus is QLC with vague specs, an extremely poor TBW rating, but occasionally the manufacturer runs out of QLC chips (nevermind they're made by same company) and has to make a batch with TLC chips - it's in the TPU database.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 10:10 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts