Thursday, December 5th 2024

Mozilla Rebrands, Reaffirms its Mission To Protect Open Web Despite Advocacy Team Layoffs

Earlier this year, it was revealed that Mozilla's entire advocacy team was caught in a round of layoffs, leading to speculation that Mozilla would be giving up its advocacy entirely, shifting to a more commercial focus. Now, with the announcement of Mozilla's new branding, aside from updating the brand's look, it seems as though the Firefox company wants to reassure users of its software that it is still dedicated to its mission to "keep the internet free, open, and accessible." The new branding strategy includes a new logo, typeface family, new icons, a T. rex mascot, and new colors.

The new branding push from Mozilla sees the brand move an appearance seemingly inspired by both its history and the text-based OS interfaces of the early years of computing. For the rebranding, Mozilla partnered with design firm JKR (Jones Knowles Ritchie), and the new branding features a cutesy DOS-style flag that doubles as a T. rex, hinting to past Mozilla logos. In the announcement of the rebranding, boldly titled "Reclaim the internet: Mozilla's rebrand for the next era of tech," Mozilla emphasizes that the new look is meant to convey the company's intention throughout its whole ecosystem of products. It seems as though Mozilla is trying to remind everyone that it's work towards a more open internet extends beyond just the advocacy team it recently laid off.

Mozilla says that its aim is to provide internet products and services that put privacy and people first:
In a time of privacy breaches, AI challenges and misinformation, this transformation is all about rallying people to take back control of their time, individual expression, privacy, community and sense of wonder.
It's been public knowledge for a while that Mozilla isn't in the best situation when it comes to finances, hence the need for the aforementioned layoffs, and the non-profit could be trying to incorporate some of the work previously done by the advocacy team into the regular company's operations, and the messaging of the new branding appears to be how it aims to do that.
At the heart of this transformation is making sure people know Mozilla for its broader impact, as well as Firefox. Our new brand strategy and expression embody our role as a leader in digital rights and innovation, putting people over profits through privacy-preserving products, open-source developer tools, and community-building efforts.
Read Mozilla's full briefing on the new brand identity on the organization's blog. Design firm JKR also has a write-up with some of the more artistic justifications included there.
Sources: Mozilla, JKR
Add your own comment

49 Comments on Mozilla Rebrands, Reaffirms its Mission To Protect Open Web Despite Advocacy Team Layoffs

#26
lexluthermiester
chrcolukPeople forking chrome was one of the best things to happen for it, as it makes its dominance look less severe, brave, edge are basically chrome with a new face painted on, and the tracking going to another company.

Its basically Chrome, Firefox, and Safari as the three players.
You missed one that is very good. Iron. All the features of Chromium, none of the crap.
www.srware.net/iron/
Sadly not as popular as it deserves to be.
Posted on Reply
#27
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
lexluthermiesterYou missed one that is very good. Iron. All the features of Chromium, none of the crap.
www.srware.net/iron/
Sadly not as popular as it deserves to be.
I'd trust them more if they could spell.

Personally I use Thorium-Win.

Posted on Reply
#28
Wirko
It's one of the logo we won't be seeing often, so I don't feel hurt. Same as the inchworm Micron logo.

But don't dare to turn the orange fox with a fiery tail into ASCII art!
Posted on Reply
#29
Hecate91
TheinsanegamerNIf firefox actually intended to continue looking out for users, they wouldnt have gutted the privacy advocacy group. The rest of the identity politics? Yeah, dump them, they are a boat anchor made of hypocrisy and hatred that makes you $0 and costs you actual leadership. But the privacy group? They did actual good, fighting for our rights as internet users. Why gut them?

Oh, right, because Firefox is controlled opposition at this point.

For anyone that thinks Firefox cares about their end users, good time to put this here

digdeeper.club/articles/mozilla.xhtml#intro
Agreed, I liked Firefox because of their privacy group, it's definitely a surprise they dumped it and baffling as to why they did other than Google is in full control. Google gives them money and Mozilla still manages to screw it up and waste money on pushing an agenda, the same thing a lot of tech companies have been pushing and failing at.
At this point I don't have any hope for Firefox, I've used it for years and i'll still use it because Google is nerfing ad blockers, if Firefox does fail at least there are several forks of the browser.
Posted on Reply
#30
lexluthermiester
dgianstefaniI'd trust them more if they could spell.

Personally I use Thorium-Win.

You're going to judge an entire browser on a simple spelling mistake? How petty are you?
Posted on Reply
#31
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
lexluthermiesterYou're going to judge an entire browser on a simple spelling mistake? How petty are you?
Nothing to do with petty and everything to do with how much care is taken. It took me five seconds to find an error on the first section of their homepage, not some obscure wiki page, and I wasn't trying. Where else is there errors? The lines of code? Unimpressed with their QC.
Posted on Reply
#32
AusWolf
I voted "yeah" because I'm all for internet privacy, but if it's just a design change, then my answer is more like "meh".
Posted on Reply
#33
lexluthermiester
dgianstefaniNothing to do with petty and everything to do with how much care is taken. It took me five seconds to find an error on the first section of their homepage, not some obscure wiki page, and I wasn't trying. Where else is there errors? The lines of code? Unimpressed with their QC.
Are you kidding? Do you honestly think the browser coders are also the web page admins? Here's a hint, they're not. Good grief man. :rolleyes:
Posted on Reply
#34
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
lexluthermiesterAre you kidding? Do you honestly think the browser coders are also the web page admins? Here's a hint, they're not. Good grief man. :rolleyes:
On a community project like this? Wouldn't be surprised.

Do the browser coders have eyes and visit their own site? But by all means keep pretending you can't see what I'm saying.
Posted on Reply
#35
AusWolf
dgianstefaniDo the browser coders have eyes and visit their own site? But by all means keep pretending you can't see what I'm saying.
How big of a corporation do you work for (I mean, besides TPU, if you do)? I work for a massive one, and I can tell you, information moves extremely slowly (or sometimes not at all) among different departments.

Besides, I don't visit my company's public website at all. I'm off work, so why would I?
Posted on Reply
#36
lexluthermiester
dgianstefaniBut by all means keep pretending you can't see what I'm saying.
Oh I'm picking up what you're putting down, seeing right through it. You keep doing you though.
Posted on Reply
#37
AsRock
TPU addict
Dr. DroJust stick to what made me a Firefox user of about 20 years now: making a high-quality, extensible browser... let us deal with the "AI challenges" and the "misinformation" through our own means and devices, such as hosts lists, plugins, etc.

I don't much care for the corporate identity... in fact, if anything, Mozilla being a community effort is a big reason to use Firefox, otherwise just go and download Opera... any flavor of it. It's a better and faster browser than Firefox would ever hope to be; the only things that make Firefox what it is are its open-source transparency and extensibility.



Exactly... it'll take more than a half-hearted "brand identity reimagination" to make them stop getting massacred by the Chromium engine browsers. The market share is 2.2% and declining, I increasingly feel like a Netscape Navigator user in the last days it's been around. I've had sites turn me away for using Firefox too...
But isn't Firefox just a Chrome version now ?.
Posted on Reply
#38
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
AsRockBut isn't Firefox just a Chrome version now ?.
No.
Posted on Reply
#39
RUSerious
I care less about branding issues and just want Firefox to run well. I liked to use it for more privacy sensitive web browsing task (banking, investments and so forth), but I'm using it less and less. A dozen tabs in Firefox, last time I had it open, was using 3x as much memory as Chrome. And that was with a plugin that deactivated tabs that weren't in use. And the memory usage was growing (mem leak?). It's kind of sad since I've been using Firefox the longest.
Posted on Reply
#40
lexluthermiester
RUSeriousI care less about branding issues and just want Firefox to run well.
Same here, and there does not seem to be any changes coming in that area, which is good becuase FF runs very well.
RUSeriousFirefox, last time I had it open, was using 3x as much memory as Chrome. And that was with a plugin that deactivated tabs that weren't in use. And the memory usage was growing (mem leak?). It's kind of sad since I've been using Firefox the longest.
Just not seeing that on my system, but then I run FireFox without the extra services..
Posted on Reply
#41
Dr. Dro
AsRockBut isn't Firefox just a Chrome version now ?.
Only Firefox and Safari (of the mainline browsers that aren't forks or variants) are left, running Gecko and WebKit respectively. Safari is exclusive to macOS (Windows version was discontinued a very long time ago), so effectively it's the only browser that isn't based on Chromium.
Posted on Reply
#42
cal5582
bring back old style plugins you cowards!
Posted on Reply
#43
trieste15
RUSeriousAnd that was with a plugin that deactivated tabs that weren't in use.
You don't need a plugin for this.
firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/browser/tabunloader/
support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/unload-inactive-tabs-save-system-memory-firefox
To tweak how long to wait idle before unloading - browser.tabs.min_inactive_duration_before_unload and edit in milliseconds.
RUSeriousAnd the memory usage was growing (mem leak?). It's kind of sad since I've been using Firefox the longest.
Try setting Firefox to open each unique domain in its own process. I find that the separation helps a lot with stability and improves predictability of memory use that includes the natural overhead that comes with an increased number of processes. With Tab Mix Plus in multirow mode giving me about 5-6 rows of scrollable tabs (mostly unopened), I'm only at 1.2 GB of memory use. This is with 28 active extensions.

dom.ipc.processCount.webIsolated
dom.ipc.processCount

I set these to the maximum value of 2147483647, which is completely unnecessary, just 100 is good enough already.
Posted on Reply
#44
Dr. Dro
cal5582bring back old style plugins you cowards!
Yeah, I miss those too. So many great plugins back in the day. Glory days of Firefox. There's a good read on why they removed xpi support... basically it was very insecure and generally incompatible with Quantum and the newer technologies that modern-day Firefox uses. I'm not really a web developer so to me a ton of these concepts can be quite foreign but, good read nonetheless

yoric.github.io/post/why-did-mozilla-remove-xul-addons/
Posted on Reply
#45
AsRock
TPU addict
dgianstefaniNo.
Aah must of been a rumor at some point and never really checked in to it, How ever i do use Mozilla's Seamonkey which i like a hell lot more than using Firefox.
Posted on Reply
#46
lexluthermiester
cal5582bring back old style plugins you cowards!
That's not going to happen, for a number of reasons, security being one of them.
AsRockHow ever i do use Mozilla's Seamonkey which i like a hell lot more than using Firefox.
That's fair. Someone mentioned Seamonkey not to long ago(maybe it was you?) and I tried out the latest version. It's looks a like an older browser, but it was solid.
Posted on Reply
#47
Wirko
trieste15You don't need a plugin for this.
firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/browser/tabunloader/
support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/unload-inactive-tabs-save-system-memory-firefox
To tweak how long to wait idle before unloading - browser.tabs.min_inactive_duration_before_unload and edit in milliseconds.
The article mentions a "memory pressure detector" but what does it measure, virtual memory or physical memory? Is Firefox inclined to use the page file, or does it avoid that?

(That's just my academic curiosity, I'm the 180° opposite of a tab hoarder)
Posted on Reply
#48
lexluthermiester
Wirkovirtual memory or physical memory?
Both.
WirkoIs Firefox inclined to use the page file, or does it avoid that?
FF will use physical exclusively unless RAM availability reaches a certain threshold(5%free), then it will dip into the virtual.
Posted on Reply
#49
cal5582
lexluthermiesterThat's not going to happen, for a number of reasons, security being one of them.


That's fair. Someone mentioned Seamonkey not to long ago(maybe it was you?) and I tried out the latest version. It's looks a like an older browser, but it was solid.
yeah i know, but a man can dream
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 12th, 2024 13:40 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts