Wednesday, January 15th 2025

UK Retailer Inadvertently Posts Radeon RX 9070 XT & 9070 GPU Specs

The majority of AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT GPU-related leaks have emerged thanks to insiders playing around with pre-launch PowerColor RDNA 4 sample models. During and since CES, Team Red and its board partners have kept mum about specifications and performance figures—but happy accidents have allowed tech enthusiasts to pore over NDA-busting information. As reported by VideoCardz yesterday, Overclockers UK (OCUK) published a landing page that provided a brief look at basic Radeon RX 9070 XT and RX 9070 (non-XT) specs—the British retailer has since scrubbed this entry from its site.

Leaks have revealed alleged core counts—4096 for XT, and 3584 for non-XT—but Overclockers UK's charts listed a count of 4096 for both Navi 48 GPUs. They both sport 16 GB GDDR6 VRAM and 256-bit memory buses, and the leak reveals another shared trait: a 260 W TDP rating. VideoCardz reckons that this is an error—based on previous clock speed insider info, the Radeon RX 9070 non-XT's power consumption figure should be rated lower. The accidentally published clock speeds appear to be sourced from overclocked examples—AMD is reportedly not going to release full/finalized information until closer to launch, so OCUK could have relied on preliminary product guides. The FAQ section states that Team Red's RDNA 4 generation is sticking with a PCI-Express 4.0 x16 host interface—PCIe 5.0 systems are "thankfully" backwards compatible. NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 50 series will be leading the way into PCIe 5.0 spec territories.
Sources: VideoCardz, OC UK (now 404-ed)
Add your own comment

6 Comments on UK Retailer Inadvertently Posts Radeon RX 9070 XT & 9070 GPU Specs

#1
Daven
I'm going to go out on a limb and say all the specs were just placeholders with no real idea what the true values will turn out to be.
Posted on Reply
#2
dir_d
DavenI'm going to go out on a limb and say all the specs were just placeholders with no real idea what the true values will turn out to be.
Yeah, why would they put 3x8 pin on a 260W card?
Posted on Reply
#3
DBGT
No way they will have the same TDP.
Posted on Reply
#4
dartuil
I doubt they both 4096 SU.
If they both 4096 , one will be 192 bit and 12gb
Posted on Reply
#5
jfrpm1985
Nobody would buy the 9700XT then. Just a clocks bump?
Posted on Reply
#6
anonuser57
dir_dYeah, why would they put 3x8 pin on a 260W card?
To ensure the user uses two cables and not just the two connectors from the same power cable.
Posted on Reply
Jan 15th, 2025 15:46 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts