Friday, January 24th 2025

New Leak Reveals NVIDIA RTX 5080 Is Slower Than RTX 4090

A set of newly leaked benchmarks has revealed the performance capabilities of NVIDIA's upcoming RTX 5080 GPU. Scheduled to launch alongside the RTX 5090 on January 30, the GPU was spotted on Geekbench under OpenCL and Vulkan benchmark tests—and based on the performance, it might not make it among the best graphics cards. The tested device was an MSI-branded RTX 5080 labeled as model MS-7E62. This setup had AMD's Ryzen 7 9800X3D processor, which many consider one of the best CPUs for gaming. It also included an MSI MPG 850 Edge TI Wi-Fi motherboard and 32 GB of DDR5-6000 memory.

The benchmark results show that the RTX 5080 scored 261,836 points in Vulkan and 256,138 points in OpenCL tests. Compared to the RTX 4080, its previous version, the RTX 5080 has a 22% boost in Vulkan performance and a small 6.7% gain in OpenCL. Reddit user TruthPhoenixV found that on the Blender Open Data platform, the GPU got a median score of 9,063.77. This score is 9.4% higher than the RTX 4080 and 8.2% better than the RTX 4080 Super. Even with these improvements, the RTX 5080 might not outperform the current-gen top-tier RTX 4090. In the past, NVIDIA's 80-class GPUs have beaten the 90-class GPUs from the previous generation, but these early numbers suggest this trend might not continue for the RTX 5080.
The RTX 5080 uses NVIDIA's latest Blackwell architecture, with 10,752 CUDA cores spread across 84 Streaming Multiprocessors (SMs) versus the 9,728 cores in the RTX 4080. It has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus. NVIDIA says it can deliver 1,801 TOPS in AI performance through Tensor Cores and 171 TeraFLOPS of ray tracing performance using its RT Cores.

That said, it's important to note that these benchmark results have not been fully verified so we should wait for the review embargo to lift before concluding.
Sources: DigitalTrends, TruthPhoenixV
Add your own comment

176 Comments on New Leak Reveals NVIDIA RTX 5080 Is Slower Than RTX 4090

#27
Dragam1337
valentyn0Nah, that's just pure copium.
Copium is a kind word for it.
Posted on Reply
#28
Visible Noise
Didn’t we already know this?
HisDivineOrderSo the 5080 really is just a 4080 Super Duper with Updated Framegen with no price increase.

Nvidia swears they can't add more raster because it's too hard, but not adding any raster improvement per watt is pretty silly because it lays bare the whole con. They're updating the AI hardware, not the graphics engine, and they're desperate to convince everyone that they had to do it. They couldn't be expected to improve raster meaningfully. It was just impossible.

They could. They just didn't and they didn't because they're an AI company now and not a graphics company.
Have you watched or read Mark Cerney’s presentation about raster performance increases?

I’ll summarize for you: Sony and AMD are also saying rasterized graphics are tapped out.
Posted on Reply
#29
oxrufiioxo
JustBenchingColor me surprised
This is the first time I can remember an 80 class Nvidia card not matching or beating the previous flagship even the weak RTX 2080 at least came out slightly ahead of the 1080ti.

#progress
valentyn0Nah, that's just pure copium.
It's sad even though they could only do so much with the 5090 without making it 800mm2 they could have done more with every card below it a 1200 usd 4090 like card would have been fine maybe they don't want it all that close to their precious 90 class anymore.

Hopefully reviews are better than expected but I'm not holding my breath.
Posted on Reply
#30
remekra
oxrufiioxoThis is the first time I can remember an 80 class Nvidia card not matching or beating the previous flagship even the weak RTX 2080 at least came out slightly ahead of the 1080ti.

#progress



It's sad even though they could only do so much with the 5090 without making it 800mm2 they could have done more with every card below it a 1200 usd 4090 like card would have been fine maybe they don't want it all that close to their precious 90 class anymore.

Hopefully reviews are better than expected but I'm not holding my breath.
They have no incentive to do so. They are turning into Intel when AMD forgot how to make good CPUs, too bad for now AMD forgot about GPUs this time. That and AI craze.

Let's hope that next gen we will see competition from top to bottom.
Posted on Reply
#31
oxrufiioxo
remekraThey have no incentive to do so. They are turning into Intel when AMD forgot how to make good CPUs, too bad for now AMD forgot about GPUs this time. That and AI craze.

Let's hope that next gen we will see competition from top to bottom.
I totally get that but if AMD wanted to they could for sure kill the 5080 by just making a monolithic RDNA4 card the size of the 7900XTX and they aren't even that competent in my book...

I guarantee you AMD is kicking themselves right now.
Posted on Reply
#32
remekra
oxrufiioxoI totally get that but if AMD wanted to they could for sure kill the 5080 by just making a monolithic RDNA4 card the size of the 7900XTX and they aren't even that competent in my book...

I guarantee you AMD is kicking themselves right now.
For now they are too busy trying to catch up nvidia in enterprise to sell as many Instinct cards as possible, while also trying to make ROCm compete with CUDA, because that's where the money is currently.
We can hope it will trinkle down to gaming with UDNA. RDNA4 seems just like a stop gap to make investors calm.
Posted on Reply
#33
Mister300
AnarchoPrimitivI said it a week ago and I'll say it again: This generation is a software update
My software update came from Steam for 6.99 USD its called lossless scaling app. Ngreedia is selling its DLSS 4 and FG to claim FPS gaming perf results, not spending 19000 for this boost unless I am doing AI or ML.
Posted on Reply
#34
bonehead123
Well, sorry if this sounds harsh, but.....

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.....
Posted on Reply
#35
Tomgang
Hmm yeah. I need and upgrade. 5090 is to exspensive and rtx 5070 ti is just as fast as rtx 4090 according to Nvidia them self and they would never lie right, 5080 seems perfect to replace my rtx 4090....

So it looks like even after over 2 years i can still say i have the second fastest Nvidia gpu. I say Nvidia cause it's unknown what amd can bring to the table of performance. No complaints here, i will happely accept second place still
Posted on Reply
#36
TheEndIsNear
I've been saying this for a while. They've hit a wall of physics. Generational jumps in performance are done until they find something else or some material or something. Making it the same way I don't see much improvement.
Posted on Reply
#37
Sound_Card
TheEndIsNearI've been saying this for a while. They've hit a wall of physics. Generational jumps in performance are done until they find something else or some material or something. Making it the same way I don't see much improvement.
Next generation will be 4 fake frames.

Sometimes I wonder if Crossfire/SLI will come back because of the wall. Wasn't multi GPU support being put in the next direct X?
Posted on Reply
#38
sethmatrix7
Well if the 5070 and 5070 ti are going to scale off that then I may not upgrade from the 3080. Little disappointing because I got a beautiful AOC 240hz 1440p OLED for $400 around Christmas time I’m looking to really drive.

Would like to upgrade but the value may be so bad it’s unjustifiable for me.
Posted on Reply
#39
Sound_Card
NanochipThe lack of competent Radeon competition is strong in these Blackwell prices/performance improvements.

until/unless AMD competes in the high end, this is what to expect. Higher prices, lesser performance uplifts (vs the predecessor).
No, I'm sorry, but just no. Consumers and consumers alone are responsible for the prices of graphics cards. They would not charge these prices if people were not willing to pay for them, and clearly, they are willing to pay for them. Unfortunately, 700, 800, 900 1k and up graphics cards are absolutely essential in their lives, and they don't hesitate to buy them, and from what I have seen ... with money they don't have. This is why I got a laptop a few years ago instead of buying a desktop, because they are actually somewhat immune to the insane price gauging in the discrete.
Posted on Reply
#40
Dazzm8
ZoneDymoI mean yeah? obviously it was going to be
It's only been more obvious in recent times, back in the day the 'new generation' 70 series class card would generally beat the previous flagship by 5-10% making the 70 series class of the new generation always attractive.

These days, I was hoping to upgrade my 6800XT to a 5080 but more likely it's going to be a 9070XT due to the price/perf difference, but as usual I'll be waiting for reviews.
Posted on Reply
#41
Krit
Sound_CardNo, I'm sorry, but just no. Consumers and consumers alone are responsible for the prices of graphics cards. They would not charge these prices if people were not willing to pay for them, and clearly, they are willing to pay for them. Unfortunately, 700, 800, 900 1k and up graphics cards are absolutely essential in their lives, and they don't hesitate to buy them, and from what I have seen ... with money they don't have. This is why I got a laptop a few years ago instead of buying a desktop, because they are actually somewhat immune to the insane price gauging in the discrete.
Finally someone tells 100% truth it's a shame that there are so few people with this mindset. Most people can't see beyond their noses...
Posted on Reply
#42
x4it3n
FamousFighterI hope it can at least match the 4090 at the time of release.
I hope you're being sarcastic because otherwise the delusion is real lol
Posted on Reply
#43
hsew
This is turning into a +25% generation. Hoping AMD realize that nVidia is going to have to switch to MCM chiplet-based GPUs within the next generation or two. That’ll be their time to strike.
Posted on Reply
#44
_roman_
remekraThey are turning into Intel when AMD forgot how to make good CPUs, too bad for now AMD forgot about GPUs this time.
I would also not really bother as AMD when no one buys my graphic cards.

Why should amd make a better product when the nvidia sticker counts more regardless.
Posted on Reply
#45
Sound_Card
KritFinally someone tells 100% truth it's a shame that there are so few people with this mindset. Most people can't see beyond their noses...
My last graphics chip was a HD 6950 for $300 brand new. Great bang for buck and was near top of the line for both AMD and Nvidia. Lasted me 11 years and still works. I don't expect people to go that long on a graphics card, but when I see people go from a 3080 to a 4080, or a 3090 to a 4090 to a 5090, I can't help but laugh. What a waste.
Posted on Reply
#46
freeagent
Sound_CardMy last graphics chip was a HD 6950 for $300 brand new. Great bang for buck and was near top of the line for both AMD and Nvidia. Lasted me 11 years and still works. I don't expect people to go that long on a graphics card, but when I see people go from a 3080 to a 4080, or a 3090 to a 4090 to a 5090, I can't help but laugh. What a waste.
When I started my family, my GTX580 Matrix Platinum was already 2 years old, I used it for 8 years lol :D

Not that I wanted to.. but there is a big difference going from a single guy to holy shit I have 2 kids and all these fecking bills lol.
Posted on Reply
#47
x4it3n
Who really thought that the 4080 with 5% more CUDA Cores and 30% more bandwidth would be faster than the 4090 with 60% more Cores and 37% more bandwidth ? :kookoo:
Posted on Reply
#48
DemonicRyzen666
Sound_CardNext generation will be 4 fake frames.

Sometimes I wonder if Crossfire/SLI will come back because of the wall. Wasn't multi GPU support being put in the next direct X?
Yes it's called mGPU & it ends up being heavily CPU limited compared to the driver-based multi-GPU like S.L.I or crossfire.
Check out the game Chernobylite it support mGPU with Raytracing.
You can run two RTX 4090 with this game.
Posted on Reply
#49
freeagent
When I was looking at reviews for my new case I saw it fit 2x 4080s with no problem, just swallowed them up.. thought that was neat and should come in handy once things level off for me :)
Posted on Reply
#50
Hxx
Macro DeviceNot even remotely the case. 5090 @ 170 SMs doesn't beat 4090 by 50% in a single game. 5080 @ 84 SMs would need astronomical core clock to even become close to 4090. It's going to be 20% faster than a plain 4080 in the most 5080-favouring scenarios with an average advantage hovering around 10%. Full stop.
lol your math aint mathin because a 4090 is 20% faster than a 4080 in overall relative performance as per TPU. If as you say a 5080 is 20% faster than a 4080, well im no math whiz but it would imply a 5080 is about on par with a 4090 in relative performance lol which is what i stated. Anyway I stand by what i said we shall see in 5 days
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 26th, 2025 23:55 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts