Friday, January 24th 2025

New Leak Reveals NVIDIA RTX 5080 Is Slower Than RTX 4090

A set of newly leaked benchmarks has revealed the performance capabilities of NVIDIA's upcoming RTX 5080 GPU. Scheduled to launch alongside the RTX 5090 on January 30, the GPU was spotted on Geekbench under OpenCL and Vulkan benchmark tests—and based on the performance, it might not make it among the best graphics cards. The tested device was an MSI-branded RTX 5080 labeled as model MS-7E62. This setup had AMD's Ryzen 7 9800X3D processor, which many consider one of the best CPUs for gaming. It also included an MSI MPG 850 Edge TI Wi-Fi motherboard and 32 GB of DDR5-6000 memory.

The benchmark results show that the RTX 5080 scored 261,836 points in Vulkan and 256,138 points in OpenCL tests. Compared to the RTX 4080, its previous version, the RTX 5080 has a 22% boost in Vulkan performance and a small 6.7% gain in OpenCL. Reddit user TruthPhoenixV found that on the Blender Open Data platform, the GPU got a median score of 9,063.77. This score is 9.4% higher than the RTX 4080 and 8.2% better than the RTX 4080 Super. Even with these improvements, the RTX 5080 might not outperform the current-gen top-tier RTX 4090. In the past, NVIDIA's 80-class GPUs have beaten the 90-class GPUs from the previous generation, but these early numbers suggest this trend might not continue for the RTX 5080.
The RTX 5080 uses NVIDIA's latest Blackwell architecture, with 10,752 CUDA cores spread across 84 Streaming Multiprocessors (SMs) versus the 9,728 cores in the RTX 4080. It has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus. NVIDIA says it can deliver 1,801 TOPS in AI performance through Tensor Cores and 171 TeraFLOPS of ray tracing performance using its RT Cores.

That said, it's important to note that these benchmark results have not been fully verified so we should wait for the review embargo to lift before concluding.
Sources: DigitalTrends, TruthPhoenixV
Add your own comment

176 Comments on New Leak Reveals NVIDIA RTX 5080 Is Slower Than RTX 4090

#127
Prima.Vera
So what happens with the RTX 4080s and 4080 Supers right now, since I see absolutely no discount prices offered? Just see the ridiculous Amazon prices, for example.

Anyways, fuck this shit. There is absolutely ZERO PC game worth investing 1500€ (real price) for a graphics card at the moment. ZERO.
I challenge anyone that can say otherwise.
Posted on Reply
#129
Krit
oxrufiioxoAt this point if it's within 10% in real world gaming vs the 4090 it should at least mean the 5070 ti is going to be ok for $750 and probably the best of the 3 cards under the 5090
RTX 5080 reminds me GTX 770 refresh relese after GTX 670 more power consumption and only slightly more performance.
Posted on Reply
#130
oxrufiioxo
KritRTX 5080 reminds me GTX 770 refresh relese after GTX 670
The key difference is the 770 was just a 680 lol but at least came pretty fast after the 600 series. This is over 2 years after the 4080.... The 700 series lead me to grabbing a 290X over it especially when it released at better than expected pricing let's hope the 9000 series at least replicates that somewhat and just ends up better and cheaper than competing Nvidia cards.
Posted on Reply
#131
Krit
oxrufiioxoThe key difference is the 770 was just a 680 lol but at least came pretty fast after the 600 series. This is over 2 years after the 4080.... The 700 series lead me to grabbing a 290X over it especially when it released at better than expected pricing let's hope the 9000 series at least replicates that somewhat and just ends up better and cheaper than competing Nvidia cards.
I had both at the time GTX 770 Directcu II and ASUS GTX 670 DirectCU II (670) was way better at cooling and noise output something was not right with asus GTX 770 cooler. GTX 670 wasn't bad but GTX 970 Gaming 4G i liked more GTX 770 was the worst of them.
Posted on Reply
#132
oxrufiioxo
KritI had both at the time GTX 770 Directcu II and ASUS GTX 670 DirectCU II (670) was way better at cooling and noise output something was not right with asus GTX 770 cooler. GTX 670 wasn't bad but GTX 970 i liked more GTX 770 was the worst of them.
I had the 290X version of that it was decent.

My 680s were lightning models in sli... which was a pain cuz my motherboard had barely enough room to accommodate... upgraded cuz 2GB of vram started running out of steam....
Posted on Reply
#133
x4it3n
FamousFighterNo I was being serious and that sucks the 5080 can't match 4090 performance.
Nvidia considers the 4090 performance as a "Professional" GPU already lol. The 4080 SUPER is the High-end and since the 5080 is getting closer to the 4090 then they didn't want to "beat" it. Sad but true... They just want to give us AI performance but not true/raw performance.
Posted on Reply
#134
freeagent
With all the new software coming out to fortify these cards, give it a few months and they will really stretch their legs.
Posted on Reply
#135
N/A
oxrufiioxoAt this point if it's within 10% in real world gaming vs the 4090 it should at least mean the 5070 ti is going to be ok for $750 and probably the best of the 3 cards under the 5090
If it does 34 Gbps and more on the memory side, the 4090 may be within 3%, but it can really make use of 24 Gbit density chips or it is incomplete.
Posted on Reply
#136
oxrufiioxo
N/AIf it does 34 Gbps and more on the memory side, the 4090 may be within 3%, but it can really make use of 24 Gbit density chips or it is incomplete.
I mean you were here saying the 5070 would be faster than the 4090 two years ago I think your 8 ball is broken bruh....
Posted on Reply
#137
mkppo
oxrufiioxoI had the 290X version of that it was decent.

My 680s were lightning models in sli... which was a pain cuz my motherboard had barely enough room to accommodate... upgraded cuz 2GB of vram started running out of steam....
I still have the 290X i bought on launch and put on water, runs great. It's one of the best GPU's i've ever bought. And then there were launch day reviews destroying it for the blower stock cooler, that being the focal point and not the performance or arch. Compared to the competing gtx 780 and 780ti, it was pretty much superior all around and aged a whole lot better with a much smaller die size to boot.

Overclocked like fire too. Then the GTX 970 launched a year later and 290X aged better than that one too even if you ignore the whole 3.5GB fiasco.

I sometimes wonder how things would have been had AMD not been scrapping for pennies at that time. They kept dragging GCN, then Raja decided to come in and make a big deal about Vega which was still pretty much GCN. So they basically dragged GCN from 2011 all the way till 2019 with VII's launch. It shows both how good an arch GCN was, and how broke AMD was to not have a new arch for almost a decade.

And yes, 5070ti seems like the best deal among the lineup at present. Sort of 4080S like performance for 750 is what I expect, which is great. But wait..isn't there something called 9070XT launching with slightly lower performance expectations? I guess it should slot right in between the 5070TI and 5070.
Posted on Reply
#138
x4it3n
oxrufiioxoI mean you were here saying the 5070 would be faster than the 4090 two years ago I think your 8 ball is broken bruh....
To be fair if Nvidia didn't cheap out with the RTX 50s the 5070 should have been a lot closer lol
Posted on Reply
#139
oxrufiioxo
x4it3nTo be fair if Nvidia didn't cheap out with the RTX 50s the 5070 should have been a lot closer lol
100% agree and I'm not even trying to call him out I'm just saying his prediction wasn't that outlandish but Nvidia has cheaped out to the max although the 5070ti would have been the more sane prediction but that for damn sure isn't coming anywhere near it either lol.

This is basically looking like the 4080 super frame gen edition.....

Nvidia is claiming 15% over the 4080 the 4090 is 28% faster in raster but 33% faster in RT so it would need to be a hell of a lot faster than what they are claiming
Posted on Reply
#140
DemonicRyzen666
Outback BronzeYou know what, this is starting to remind me of the 2xxx series where the RTX 2080 was equal to the 1080 Ti and the 2080 Ti cost a bomb. But check out the prices back then vs AIB cards. The FE is more expensive. This seems to have been reversed by what cards (5090) W1z has just published.

RTX 2080 Ti$9994352641350 MHz1545 MHz1750 MHzTU10218600M11 GB, GDDR6, 352-bit
RTX 2080 Ti FE$11994352641350 MHz1635 MHz1750 MHzTU10218600M11 GB, GDDR6, 352-bit
I have problem with this

Jenson top on stage price in hand said on video. ( You check MLID youtube he literally showed the video of him saying this price)
Bottom Nvidia's Actual price on their website for MSRP for the FE card
Rest of the cards in other stores $1,350.
Posted on Reply
#141
oxrufiioxo
DemonicRyzen666I have problem with this

Jenson top on stage price in hand said on video. ( You check MLID youtube he literally showed the video of him saying this price)
Bottom Nvidia's Actual price on their website for MSRP for the FE card
Rest of the cards in other stores $1,350.
This was the case for the 1080 and 2080ti at launch the FE was higher than MSRP meaning all AIB either matched the FE in price or were more expensive the Gaming X 1080 for example was 720 usd at launch even though the make believe MSRP was $599...... The 2080ti as you say was 1200+ the majority of it's life at the end a couple 999 usd models popped up but they were blower style if I am remembering correctly.

For some reason the 1080ti FE and MSRP were identical....


Posted on Reply
#142
Gucky
It should have been at least 15% faster as the 4090 to keep the usual generational uplift.
But being this slow means this generation is like an Intel refresh.
oxrufiioxoAt this point if it's within 10% in real world gaming vs the 4090 it should at least mean the 5070 ti is going to be ok for $750 and probably the best of the 3 cards under the 5090
Sadly the 5070Ti won't have a FE, meaning there will be no cards at 750$.
Posted on Reply
#143
solarmystic
ypsylonWell IMHO anyone on higher end 4000 series shouldn't upgrade at all. It's not any shocker that 5080 is slower than 4090. This release is more for folks still on 2000/3000 series. And if you need VRAM then 5090 is: YES.

Me personally maximum CUDA and VRAM which makes 5090 obvious jumping from 3090 for 2.5x rendering uplift/card. But we'll see still plenty of optimizations when it comes to compute in next 4-6 months so it may be even nicer. For gaming surely nobody needs 5090.
As another poster mentioned earlier on, this would be the FIRST ever generation where the x80 card fails to match or beat the consumer flagship card of the previous generation, so even if it's not surprising due to the spec leaks/reveal from NVIDIA, it's still extremely disappointing.

Looking at TPU's own Relative Performance data from GTX 980 onwards:-

GTX 980 was 11% faster than the GTX 780TI
GTX 1080 was 31% faster than the GTX 980TI
RTX 2080 was 9% faster than the GTX 1080TI
RTX 3080 was 36% faster than the RTX 2080TI
RTX 4080 was 30% faster than the RTX 3090

Even the much maligned Turing based x80 was faster than the previous flagship and that generation was considered a colossal disappointment, so what does that make Blackwell lol.
Posted on Reply
#144
scorpioo
megaclitehow you sold 4090 for $1400 if their price on ebay was $1800+ the whole 2024
I sold it from the fb marketplace without looking around prices a lot; there were 4090s around 1500, mostly
Posted on Reply
#145
RJ
In conversations with friends, I refer to the 5080 as 5075.
Posted on Reply
#146
toooooot
remekraSince 5070 = 4090 but 5080 < 4090 then 5080 < 5070? And I thought AMD had a strange naming change but ok.
You got to be careful, Nvidia has dispatched it's reputation protection unit. I would advise changing the comment to something like "I love frame generation, it is the best"
Posted on Reply
#148
Bomby569
KritWhen was the last time ? People were buying overpriced RTX 40 Series like a crazy without even thinking twice. If this will continue the same way with RTX 50 Series situation with RTX 60 Series will be even worse p/p wise.
you replied to a post about the *080 on a topic about the 5080, with a general comment about all nvidia cards to my comment on the 80 class card, and then you pretend like i mentioned all nvidia cards, ask a silly question, followed by whatever you want to talk despite replying to something else. It's a true work of art of brain malfunctioning
Posted on Reply
#149
Legacy-ZA
Prima.VeraSo what happens with the RTX 4080s and 4080 Supers right now, since I see absolutely no discount prices offered? Just see the ridiculous Amazon prices, for example.

Anyways, fuck this shit. There is absolutely ZERO PC game worth investing 1500€ (real price) for a graphics card at the moment. ZERO.
I challenge anyone that can say otherwise.
I expected them to discount them greatly on Black Friday / Christmas season, but that didn't happen. That was such a stupid move, it was the perfect time to move old stock out of the market.
Posted on Reply
#150
Hxx
Vayra86It includes 1080p and 1440p where these cards get heavily bottlenecked. Stop living in denial
Oh duh cause no one owns a 9800x3d and a high refresh 1440p/1080p display . Who is denial again ?
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 27th, 2025 00:09 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts