Saturday, October 20th 2007
Comcast Actively Interferes With File Sharing Services
Comcast, one of the largest providers of cable television and internet in America, decided recently that they were fed up with the huge amount of file sharing traffic on their network, which was beginning to affect the speed of other users connections. And so, they've snuck a little code into their cable internet services. Subscribers of Comcast can download all the BitTorrent/P2P content that they desire without a problem. However, when they in turn try to upload it to other BitTorrent/P2P users, Comcast forbids the file transfer from completing. Whether this is done via hardware or software is unclear. Regardless, this certainly puts a damper on file sharing. While this does stop potential pirates in their tracks, an independent film maker or artist hoping to share their content via BitTorrent will have to find a different service provider to share their content on.
Source:
DailyTech
26 Comments on Comcast Actively Interferes With File Sharing Services
How ever what i have been disliking is the price increases all the time.
As for P2P GOOD i don't mind one bit..
All so all those 100's or when i did use it my self 1000's of connections cannot do the network any good.
as you can tell comcast, and other internet service providers will follow blocking sites that they dont want you on (because they dont get more money)
time to write your congressmen here in the usa to make internet neutrality a law rather then depend on the service providers to give you the bandwidth which you already pay for !!!
this is different problem, but its going to have plenty of unsatisfied customers
so it was about more and more money for ISP's for basically nothing
i pay a certain amount for x amount of service , i should get all that bandwidth for what ever i want .
but them blocking bit torrents is a start next they will they will trottle or block other sites they dont get money from except the bandwidth you pay for
but if they identify P2P networks as "pirating-only" then it becomes much harder to see the difference
My question is, If I'm uploading to my Host for my domain and my website will it attempt to drop those? I'd be pissed. I've already had conversations with Charter (my crappy ISP) about how important my upload is compared to my download.
In my area, you have one of two options, one being dialup (yeah right like I want to go back to that) or the second being Comcast (Ill stick with my 6Mbps connection thanks)
Talk about being stuck between a rock and a hard place. :banghead:
Why not just make a basic website and advertise like normal people do?
I never have caught onto the concept of uploading something to be file shared.
I can't think of one thing that needs to be on a filesharing network of sorts, except maybe when demos or patches for software is released and the main site(s) it's hosted on, are bogged down with network traffic. But those situations are a miniscule amount compared to illegal filesharing incidents.
If you don't have your own website, then you can setup your own ftp, and failing that, you can upload to a database somewhere.
I think it's a great move on Comcast's part. It's their networks anyways, why should decent paying customers be bogged down, so a bunch of fifteen year old twits can seed and share their bootlegged rippoffed Anime movies?