Monday, November 26th 2007
G92-Based 8800GTS 512 Could Possibly Arrive December 11th
It would seem as though NVIDIA is celebrating the day that I get my full drivers license, sans passenger restrictions, by releasing the revamped NVIDIA GeForce 8800GTS 512, based on the impressive G92 micro-architecture. The new 8800GTS 512 will only come in one flavor, which, as the name suggests, will sport 512MB of 256-bit VRAM. This is opposed to the previous versions, which ship with either 320MB or 640MB of 320-bit VRAM. The new 8800GTS 512 will come with 128 Stream processors, a welcome improvement from the previous 96 Stream processors. The new 8800GTS also has another welcome surprise: an engine clock of 650MHz, higher than any 8800 series GPU before it. Current rumor has it that the 8800GTS 512's 512MB of VRAM will be clocked at roughly 1.96GHz. The 8800GTS 512 should be available on December 11th for between $299 and $349 USD.
Source:
Reg Hardware
30 Comments on G92-Based 8800GTS 512 Could Possibly Arrive December 11th
this card will put my G80 card to shame.
I thought the shader boost put this card at 8800 Ultra levels?
Saying that you should buy an 8800GTS because of higher clock speeds than an 8800Ultra is like saying you should buy a 3.6GHz P4 because it's faster than the 2.8GHz A64 FX-59 :p.
If ATi now still fading away, from 11th of December will be totally annihilated!! :laugh:
And that won't be so good...No ATi-nVidia graphic card's fight? No party...I mean prices..
I doubt they will release a 1gb model this year (if ever!), it would kill the GTX/Ultra sales.
Now of course it may be that the GTS overclocks much better than that or you may not fancy the thought of a small BIOS mod, if thats the case then the extra cash may be money well spent but these things are going to be scarcer than rockin horse shit and the prices therefore are likely to be even more hiked than the 8800GT, I am gettting a GT and if performance is that much better in reality on the GTS I will fleabay the GT in about 4-6 months once prices have settled and upgrade.
There's the posibility they were expecting 40% of chips cualificate as GTS and other 60% as GT, for example. But they got 60/40 instead. Of course they couldn't take out GTS yet, because if GT is killing GTX and Ultra sales imagine the GTS. They couldn't make them faster neither because of the same problem. And deactivating SPs on too many chips doesn't make sense neither. On the other hand they had to compete with HD3000 series, so their only solution was to release the GT in short supply, hold those chips somehow, acumulating GTS ones and maybe even reservating some for a posible new one with higher clocks, just as with GTX/Ultra. When they finally launch them, they have done all that was posible to sell remainig GTX, Ultra and old GTS. They can't hold G92 forever, anyway.
That's what I think, and as I said it's only speculation (indeed only one between others), so don't kill me yet, OK? :p
I'm starting to like nVidia, their greed and marketing tactics means there are more and more realistically priced videocards coming through from those people who 'must have the best'.
What a better excuse for what I said than that? They get their card first to market. They have a proof of what they can do against DAAMIT. They claim that they have plenty of chips already made, but because of a shortage in that power component they can't release them already. Doing this they don't sacrifice their public image as they would by saying they didn't make enough chips (that could mean poor yields or bad planification, for example), but at the same time they have an excuse to not release too many GTs. That way they contribute to the "halo" effect, so the only thing that the average joe knows is that Nvidia is faster again. When they go to stores and they can't get the 8800GT their question to the seller is: "And there's any other 8800 similar to this one?". Guess what is the response of the seller in the big brand stores?
I never believed that "excuse" when I read it, antway. They can only qualificate one component from one vendor? All others are not good enough? Well, I don't think so, this card is not power hungry. Are not cheap enough? Well, GT are selling well above their price tag, because of the shortage. A production cost a little bit higher wouldn't hurt as much...
No, I think that either they have production issues on the chip (most likely?), or they are holding them back.
:toast:
It would rock a card with such shading power though. It would be near 1,5 TFlops. :eek: Nope, it won't. Different SP, TMU and ROP quantity. It's a different architecture. Better said it's a different arrangement of the same architecture, but still different. It would work if the difference was only in clock speeds.