Tuesday, February 12th 2008

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 Launch Date Announced

According to VR-Zone the launch date for GeForce 9800 GX2 has been set to March 11th this year. The second NVIDIA dual card will see public for the first time during this year's CeBIT. Working samples and final specs are still to be released. NVIDIA has also asked its partners to put a label on their product boxes to address concerns about end users plugging in the 8-pin connector for motherboard into the 8-pin PCIe power connector on the 9800GX2 card.
Source: VR-Zone
Add your own comment

75 Comments on NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 Launch Date Announced

#51
Nitrogliserin
lol:)
you have absolutly no idea what next-gen consoles capable of.
you mean that you can play assassins creed / gears of war / mass effect etc with your 200$ system?
funny:)
Posted on Reply
#52
DEFEATEST
Now I would love to see your computer my friend! wow cod4 on a SUB 200$ system?
please let us know your secret.........
Posted on Reply
#53
asb2106
rhythmeisterOwns? Just beats but at a price premium I think you mean :slap:
you thought wrong, It will hold its own. meaning it will do fine.
Posted on Reply
#54
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
Nitrogliserinlol:)
you have absolutly no idea what next-gen consoles capable of.
you mean that you can play assassins creed / gears of war / mass effect etc with your 200$ system?
funny:)
His $200 PC can do 200^200 things more than a console. Plus that's a award-winning video-card he's using (look at his HWbot). don't start a PC vs. Console bitchfest here. Please talk to the topic.
Posted on Reply
#55
asb2106
rhythmeisterHave you played an xbox 360 on a 42" Samsung screen? :eek:
have you played crysis on a 42" Samsung screen?

xbox plays all games at a steady frame rate, at a standard rez(I dont know what, I dont care either). A computer can run extremely high resolutions, and can produce much higher FPS than XBOX, Im not saying XBOX isnt cool, but you cannot compare XBOX to a computer. Any mid to high end gaming rig will eat a XBOX in performance and graphics. If your PC will allow you can crank the detail levels so high that games look simply amazing.

And yes, when it comes down to price XBOX will win all day everyday, but when you have a gaming PC, the xbox doesnt even compare.
Posted on Reply
#56
asb2106
btarunrDon't start a PC vs. Console bitchfest here. Please talk to the topic.
sorry, didnt mean to add to it
Posted on Reply
#57
Nitrogliserin
btarunrHis $200 PC can do 200^200 things more than a console. Plus that's a award-winning video-card he's using (look at his HWbot). don't start a PC vs. Console bitchfest here. Please talk to the topic.
Run a linux@ps3 then you do that 200^200 things.
I have PS3 and a better PC than his precious sub system.I can compare PC vs PS3 in my room!

whatever nevermind...
Posted on Reply
#58
craigwhiteside
NitrogliserinRun a linux@ps3 then you do that 200^200 things.
I have PS3 and a better PC than his precious sub system.I can compare PC vs PS3 in my room!

whatever nevermind...
please do not troll :shadedshu
Posted on Reply
#59
rhythmeister
crow1001Considering an 8800GT owns the ass of a 3870, its a safe bet that the 9800GTX2 will trounce the 3870X2.:nutkick:
I meant to quote that for inaccuracy^^^
Posted on Reply
#60
rhythmeister
asb2106have you played crysis on a 42" Samsung screen?

xbox plays all games at a steady frame rate, at a standard rez
On a HD TV at whatever res' they'll look basically the same only the 360 which cost less than 1/2 the price of my rig in spec's has the bang per buck ffs :banghead:

Anyway, I hope it bombs so I can get one as my next card ;)
Posted on Reply
#61
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
i like gaming in 720p on my 40" TV as well. That said, 720p (1280x720) is lower res than what i played the original unreal tournament on (1280x1024)

Consoles lag all the time, its why i hate them - halo 1 and 2 lagged constantly in halo, especialy in coop.

Give me a 9800gx2 and i'll sit here and happily play on a low resolution TV all day long :D
Posted on Reply
#62
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
Nitrogliserinlol:)
you have absolutly no idea what next-gen consoles capable of.
you mean that you can play assassins creed / gears of war / mass effect etc with your 200$ system?
funny:)
did you not read my specs i have SS of my rig running Crysis @1024X768 on med/high and a 30+fps yourt PS3/360 cant do that
DEFEATESTNow I would love to see your computer my friend! wow cod4 on a SUB 200$ system?
please let us know your secret.........
i dont have a copy of COD4 but when i get it i will be more than happy to show you my rig running it. if it runs crysis i think it will run COD4 just fine :laugh:
btarunrHis $200 PC can do 200^200 things more than a console. Plus that's a award-winning video-card he's using (look at his HWbot). don't start a PC vs. Console bitchfest here. Please talk to the topic.
thanks for backing me up mate
Posted on Reply
#63
DEFEATEST
cdawalldid you not read my specs i have SS of my rig running Crysis @1024X768 on med/high and a 30+fps yourt PS3/360 cant do that


i dont have a copy of COD4 but when i get it i will be more than happy to show you my rig running it. if it runs crysis i think it will run COD4 just fine :laugh:


thanks for backing me up mate
Can you please just show us all your specs, which I do see on the side, and add them up to show me how that costs under 200 dollars. I dont belive that anyone is questioning the specs themselves and what they can or cant do, it's the $$$ that that cost you for an entire system.:)

So I'm assuming alot of it was used?
Posted on Reply
#64
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
DEFEATESTCan you please just show us all your specs, which I do see on the side, and add them up to show me how that costs under 200 dollars. I dont belive that anyone is questioning the specs themselves and what they can or cant do, it's the $$$ that that cost you for an entire system.:)

So I'm assuming alot of it was used?
none of his hardware is that new, socket 754, DDR1 ram, old video card. My system only cost me $1200, not counting the screen.
Posted on Reply
#65
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
DEFEATESTCan you please just show us all your specs, which I do see on the side, and add them up to show me how that costs under 200 dollars. I dont belive that anyone is questioning the specs themselves and what they can or cant do, it's the $$$ that that cost you for an entire system.:)

So I'm assuming alot of it was used?
A64 3400+ $50 used from AthlonX2
(i played it on my 3000+ which came with the mobo free AMIR)
gemini II $13 on ebay
Machspeed K8M8MS...free AMIR
2X512mb ultra DDR400...pulls/free from old system $25ea AMIR when purchased
BFG 7800GS OC...$120 AMIR
Cuda 320GB SATA drive...$60 AMIR @bestbuy
17" LCD...free from neighbor (helped her move out)
CD/DVD drives...free from neighbor (helped her move out)
Ultra case...pulls/free from old system $50 AMIR

so i spent with my current 3400+
$50+$13+$120+$60=$243
with my old 3000+ which played just fine
$13+$120+$60=$181
i guess if you wanted to go with the reused parts
$50+$13+$25*2+$120+$60+$50=$343
Posted on Reply
#66
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
Apply this logic, that if cda had to sell that now, he'd do so for exactly $200, which means he was right, $200.
Posted on Reply
#67
DEFEATEST
Ok, your point really though is that your system can play these games, money has nothing to do with it, especially in your case. So I'm not sure why all of this fiasco. I can also sit here and say that my 50 dollar system can play crysis cranked, because I got all but one stick of ram for free for helping a neighbor move. So I could have a kick ass system with sli 8800 gtx's and say that my 50 dollar system can play crysis cranked. Not that I don't believe you but do you see what I am saying? By boasting that your very cheaply built system can do better than a 360 or ps3, which by the way it really is not as powerful in most instances, you lead everyone to believe that 200 bucks is all you need when in fact it is not! pfew! Now I need a drink! :)
Posted on Reply
#68
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
his point was merely that cheap PC's can be had too. its gone a little out of hand, cause he loves to brag about how cheap it was.
Posted on Reply
#69
Nitrogliserin
cdawalldid you not read my specs i have SS of my rig running Crysis @1024X768 on med/high and a 30+fps yourt PS3/360 cant do that
yes I saw. and I said I have a better Pc than your system
and believe me I know how did you play crysis on your system. cause my crysis experience wasnt so satisfy at all.except if you believe under 30fps is good:laugh:
you really dont know consoles thatswhy please dont say anything to me anymore. just take a look at assassins creed PC Req and try to play with your 200$ system when it comes out;)
Posted on Reply
#70
candle_86
Nitrogliserinlol:)
you have absolutly no idea what next-gen consoles capable of.
you mean that you can play assassins creed / gears of war / mass effect etc with your 200$ system?
funny:)
well in all honesty its possible, techniclly speaking an 8600GT is more powerful than RSX which is a G71 with half the rops, and the Xeneos GPU is just a glorified R500 class chip.

The advantage of the console is that the game is optimized for that hardware, and why ports from console suck so bad in preformance on PC. The truth is a PC is alot more powerful and games like Crysis would have trouble working on the 360/PS3.
Posted on Reply
#71
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
DEFEATESTOk, your point really though is that your system can play these games, money has nothing to do with it, especially in your case. So I'm not sure why all of this fiasco. I can also sit here and say that my 50 dollar system can play crysis cranked, because I got all but one stick of ram for free for helping a neighbor move. So I could have a kick ass system with sli 8800 gtx's and say that my 50 dollar system can play crysis cranked. Not that I don't believe you but do you see what I am saying? By boasting that your very cheaply built system can do better than a 360 or ps3, which by the way it really is not as powerful in most instances, you lead everyone to believe that 200 bucks is all you need when in fact it is not! pfew! Now I need a drink! :)
all i got was the cd/dvd drives and a monitor from my neighbor? that would come out to what $100 extra? and to prove you can for $300 build a good system...

Biostar P35 mobo $47
e1200 $59
silverstone PSU $35
GSKILL 2x1gb DDR2 $40
MSI 8600GT $65
80GB HDD $37
rosewill case $25

so that comes out to $308 find a console that will play games better than this system (after overclocking of course) and thats a complete system less the OS which can be had for free :D so i guess you were right in saying $200 is not all you need but hell make it $300 and you have yourself a damn good system :roll:
Musselshis point was merely that cheap PC's can be had too. its gone a little out of hand, cause he loves to brag about how cheap it was.
yes i do im proud that my i guess to make defeatest happy my $343 system can run everything i need it to run
Posted on Reply
#72
Nitrogliserin
candle_86well in all honesty its possible, techniclly speaking an 8600GT is more powerful than RSX which is a G71 with half the rops, and the Xeneos GPU is just a glorified R500 class chip.

The advantage of the console is that the game is optimized for that hardware, and why ports from console suck so bad in preformance on PC. The truth is a PC is alot more powerful and games like Crysis would have trouble working on the 360/PS3.
PC = you have bugatti veyron which is 1001 hp and top speed 420km/h but the road is very short and damaged and you cant do even 200km/h. and the road workers dont make the road surface better :D


m8 I def agree with you. thatswhy two years ago I spend a x360 money to buy a x1800xt.
today xbox360 plays all games well but my graphic card doesnt.
Posted on Reply
#73
Edito
I just don't belive you Cancle_86, or maybe you are running games like crysis with unplayable fps under 20fps, or u are running the game at 800x600 show us some screenshots with fraps running to let us see ur fps in game... im not against u Candle_86 i just don't belive ur system can handle games like crysis well, because i have a better system im sorry but i have and i just can run crysis with medium at 1400x900...
Posted on Reply
#74
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
EditoI just don't belive you Cancle_86, or maybe you are running games like crysis with unplayable fps under 20fps, or u are running the game at 800x600 show us some screenshots with fraps running to let us see ur fps in game... im not against u Candle_86 i just don't belive ur system can handle games like crysis well, because i have a better system im sorry but i have and i just can run crysis with medium at 1400x900...
oh IN GAME too, not the benchmark tool.
Posted on Reply
#75
candle_86
ok whatever, but as i said a console would struggle with PC games like Crysis, I ran crysis at all low, can play medium but get some drops i dont like.

here is my fraps report happy?



right after i leave the dome.

@ 10x7

the 0 was the level loading lol.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 20th, 2024 06:00 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts