Friday, April 18th 2008

AMD 780G vs Intel G35

AMD has released marketing material comparing their integrated graphics chip with Intel. The material shows the 780G operating in IGP only mode as well as Hybrid Crossfire mode with real-time in-game videos.

Click on the news link for the full video.
Source: Youtube
Add your own comment

25 Comments on AMD 780G vs Intel G35

#1
CrackerJack
i don't think that's right. How do you get just 16fps in a game that was made 4 years ago. I got better than that with x1950 and 4200+ x2.
Posted on Reply
#2
Pinchy
Wow that might actually give a nice boost in performance in Hybrid CrossfireX, on something like a HD3650.
CrackerJacki don't think that's right. How do you get just 16fps in a game that was made 4 years ago. I got better than that with x1950 and 4200+ x2.
Na thats no lies. On my G33, I can't play CSS on LOW settings with pixels @ 640x480..

Also, an x1950 pro is loads better than any IGP. (Any dedicated card is normally better than IGP)
Posted on Reply
#3
csendesmark
This 780G is the best chipset if you build a fully integrated PC :)
Posted on Reply
#4
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
With cards way below $100 that can crush any IGP, I don't really think gaming performance is really important on an IGP.

A ability to add a descrete GPU in crossfire with the IGP is nice, but with it only supporting the 3400 and 2400 series, it is useless to enthususts like the users of this site. A common user might find it more useful. Perhaps if ATi allows it to be used with higher end descrete GPUs it would be nice, but how much of a performance boost is it really going to give when paired with a 3870?

It would be nice to be able to use the IGP for something like AA. Where the IGP does nothing but applying 2x or 4x AA, so when used with a descrete GPU you get essentially a free 4x AA.

Edit: I'd also like to see the performance on the same system with the just 3450. How much does the IGP really help it? And how does it compete with nVidia's offerings? Intel's offering have always been behind ATi and nVidia, Intel always gives performance that is just good enough.
Posted on Reply
#5
CrackerJack
PinchyWow that might actually give a nice boost in performance in Hybrid CrossfireX, on something like a HD3650.




Na thats no lies. On my G33, I can't play CSS on LOW settings with pixels @ 640x480..

Also, an x1950 pro is loads better than any IGP. (Any dedicated card is normally better than IGP)
oh that was just igp, well that changes things lol
Posted on Reply
#6
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
newtekie1With cards way below $100 that can crush any IGP, I don't really think gaming performance is really important on an IGP.

A ability to add a descrete GPU in crossfire with the IGP is nice, but with it only supporting the 3400 and 2400 series, it is useless to enthususts like the users of this site. A common user might find it more useful. Perhaps if ATi allows it to be used with higher end descrete GPUs it would be nice, but how much of a performance boost is it really going to give when paired with a 3870?

It would be nice to be able to use the IGP for something like AA. Where the IGP does nothing but applying 2x or 4x AA, so when used with a descrete GPU you get essentially a free 4x AA.

Edit: I'd also like to see the performance on the same system with the just 3450. How much does the IGP really help it? And how does it compete with nVidia's offerings? Intel's offering have always been behind ATi and nVidia, Intel always gives performance that is just good enough.
there are several threads on XS that show comparos between them
Posted on Reply
#7
WarEagleAU
Bird of Prey
Well I cant check it at work, but are they saying they are winning? No surprise there given Intel doesnt exacly "own" a discrete graphics company.
Posted on Reply
#8
trog100
its probably where the mass market money is but somehow i cant get excited about integrated grafix of any kind.. :)

i am using integrated sounds thow..

trog
Posted on Reply
#9
jocksteeluk
All intel really needs to do is make the same comparison with the Cpus and pretty much silence Amd because it's the CPU that sells not on board graphics, AMD needs to cut prices or bring out more competitive cpus.
Posted on Reply
#10
springs113
WarEagleAUWell I cant check it at work, but are they saying they are winning? No surprise there given Intel doesnt exacly "own" a discrete graphics company.
whether or not intel owns a discrete graphics company...they have been in the graphics depo for a while...if you buy a laptop even desktop if the graphics does not say nvidia or ati..it is usually intel...i believe the last igp was the x3100...
Posted on Reply
#11
springs113
WarEagleAUWell I cant check it at work, but are they saying they are winning? No surprise there given Intel doesnt exacly "own" a discrete graphics company.
whether or not intel owns a discrete graphics company...they have been in the graphics depo for a while...if you buy a laptop even desktop if the graphics does not say nvidia or ati..it is usually intel...i believe the last igp was the x3100...
Posted on Reply
#12
Dangle
I think this video was on TPU's front page months ago.

or maybe it was engadget.
Posted on Reply
#13
Morgoth
Fueled by Sapphire
intel is planing to put gpu and cpu on 1 die
Nehalem, havendale/auburndale wil be the first cpu's that uses this
Posted on Reply
#14
WarEagleAU
Bird of Prey
AMD Has been planning that too. And if Im not mistaken, hasnt Nehalem come out already or is that another code name that is out? The q9650 and such.

And I know theyve been knee deep in it, but its not a super specialty of theirs, like AMD has ATI to do graphics.
Posted on Reply
#15
Morgoth
Fueled by Sapphire
no nehalem wil be released end this year as bloomfield and its server version
Posted on Reply
#16
Pinchy
newtekie1With cards way below $100 that can crush any IGP, I don't really think gaming performance is really important on an IGP.
It would help on a cheap laptop :)
Posted on Reply
#17
ShadowFold
Glad I went with AMD for my HTPC build! Im lovin my 780G+HD3200 :D Just watched I Am Legend on it :)
Posted on Reply
#18
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
PinchyIt would help on a cheap laptop :)
I didn't know they were putting the 780G in laptops.
Posted on Reply
#19
Steevo
Moar awesomear for ATI. Intel integrated sucks, I have a few machines I built with and now put in cards to allow moar bettar and faster Adobe lockups :p. But seriously that is good for a integrated core, specially for lappies where graphics have always been sub par for doing anything.
Posted on Reply
#20
tkpenalty
Well this is my honest opinion. Remember the E2160 + G35 is slower than the 4850X2 LE + 780G, and costs more as well! Not everyone wants a discrete GPU. $50 Can mean a lot for OEM systems moreover.

HOWEVER. This is old news.
Posted on Reply
#21
Pinchy
newtekie1I didn't know they were putting the 780G in laptops.
Me neither...but thats not the point. The point is the technology is there, so it is possible now ;). Currently its at least like $100-150 over here for an 8400M over onboard graphics in a laptop.
Posted on Reply
#22
tkpenalty
Well AMD Does make cool running chips so it wouldnt be hard for a 780G + 4850LE in a lappy.
Posted on Reply
#23
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
springs113whether or not intel owns a discrete graphics company...they have been in the graphics depo for a while...if you buy a laptop even desktop if the graphics does not say nvidia or ati..it is usually intel...i believe the last igp was the x3100...
i have that on my mini 2.0 rig :) it actually does everything not gaming just fine... its even advertised as handling 1080p bluray media with low-end CPU's (such as the E21x0 line)
Posted on Reply
#24
mrhuggles
is the e2140 considered low end when its at like 3ghz?
Posted on Reply
#25
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
mrhugglesis the e2140 considered low end when its at like 3ghz?
Midrange - due to the lower cache, that would roughly match a Conroe chip (4MB cache) at 2.4-2.6GHz.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 17th, 2025 17:42 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts