Monday, September 14th 2009
Leadtek GeForce GTS 250 v2 Pictured
Leadtek designed a new simple, low-cost graphics accelerator based on the GeForce GTS 250 graphics processor. The GTS 250 v2 comes in a compact, yet fully capable form-factor. It has a short PCB, a GPU cooler that spans its entire length, and clock speeds that adhere to NVIDIA's reference speeds, at 738/2200 MHz (core/memory), and comes in 512 MB and 1 GB variants. Its cooler comprises of a GPU block from which three aluminum heatpipes convey heat to a dense aluminum fin array, with a fan nested in the center. The card's VRM and memory come with heatsinks, and are cooled under the fan's airflow. The card requires a single 6-pin PCI-Express power connector. The card is 3-way SLI capable with other GeForce GTS 250 accelerators. Leadtek may price these on the lower side of the spectrum, where they provide good value.
Source:
VideoKonsolu
20 Comments on Leadtek GeForce GTS 250 v2 Pictured
I had a few of the GTS250s and they were excellent cards, being shorter and having the single power plug makes them even better.
I know it sounds silly but I bet if the PCBs were black they would sell double the cards.
These are meant to be budget cards, not nice looking.
They work in all but my main rig, as only my main rig has a window. When you're on a budget, making your computer look nice is stupid. Buy a $25 case, and spend the money on performance.
You are cool guy so they probably just don't know you well enough I guess. Think of the G92 as a lab created ruby. Looks great and cheap. But soon enough it will not look good enough for the enthusiast crowd and they will move on. A cockroach would be 2900 series ATI. Eats power and is too weak for new games.
What is this, 2008?
In about one month HD5700s will hit the market at $100 replacing HD4700s while outperforming HD487/90. Bye bye G92.
I would'nt be surprised if Nvidia tested 40nm on a G92(c :laugh:) it would make for great low power chips tho.
or is that just palit?
would make more sense to me if this was the same tbh.
if i had a dollar for everytime i saw a g92 press release ...
I think the big issue is that one is $300 new and the other is $200. People just aren't up for spending that kind of money right now. Even after I dropped the prices to $200 and $100. Especially not on specialized things like Acrylic cases. You have to find the right person to buy one of those. The HD5700's aren't going to be out for a good while. We will see the HD5800s this year, but that is it. The mid-range cards always take a while to come out after the high end. Look at RV770 and RV730. RV730 came out over 3 months after RV770. The same was true with RV670 and RV635.
So don't get your hopes up for a $100 HD5700 any time soon. And even then, they will release the HD5600 series first, which if history repeats, will be rather crappy, and fail to even outperform the previous generations cards(the HD4670 didn't even outperform an HD3850, the HD3650 didn't even outperform the HD2900GT). So we are looking at the HD5600 series being close to HD4850 performance, probably a little less actually...and you know what else is similar to HD4850 performance? The GTS250...
I could be totally wrong, and the HD5000 series mid-range could totally kick ass, but that hasn't been the case in the past, and I doubt it will be the case now. In the full configuration, I don't think any company has managed to get the G92 to the point where it will run off a just the slot. In the cut down forms(9800GT) they have though.