Monday, February 22nd 2010

NVIDIA To Unveil GeForce GTX 400 Series at PAX

NVIDIA built a fair bit of hype over the weekend on Twitter, when it said that come Monday, it would make a "major announcement". It turns out that the company will unveil its GeForce GTX 400 series graphics card at the PAX East gaming event to be held in late March, on the 26th, 31 days away at the time of preparing this report. The PAX East event will be held in Boston, United States.

NVIDIA will unveil two of its high-end, next-generation graphics cards based on the GeForce GTX 480 and GeForce GTX 470. Being DirectX 11 compliant marks that generation shift. An American online retailer listed the GeForce GTX 480 for US $699 on pre-order.
Add your own comment

73 Comments on NVIDIA To Unveil GeForce GTX 400 Series at PAX

#26
crow1001
Going on reports their top card will not be much better than a 5870, the fact they can't even give us performance figures and instead give some naff announcement about making an announcement confirms this. NV fanboys prepare to set sail on the NV boat of fail..:laugh:
Posted on Reply
#27
Athlon2K15
HyperVtX™
Easy Rhinoi am assuming that is Boston, Mass not Boston, Texas :laugh:

if these cards are truly going to be that price then i will be pissed. why not offer a mid-range alternative. nvidia is starting to piss me off!
have patience young rhino the high end always comes first:)
Posted on Reply
#28
EastCoasthandle
Additional information

I've been reading their article and here is what they are indicating (no it's not from Charlie this time):
  • Fermi won't be seen until sometime in May 2010, (Q2 of FY 2011)
  • Delay is the result of bug(s) or thermal related issues
  • They know the specs and performance numbers but wouldn't state them. However, did state that clock frequencies (650 MHz) is lower then expected and it has an effect on performance (hint, hint). They also indicate that the 470 and 480 will be competitive towards the 5850 and 5870. But did indicate that 470/480 won't be a knock out. Indicating that ATI's offering in performance is superb. They are not sure if 650 MHz will be the final clock rate though.
  • ATI will have re-spun and re-binned their upcoming products (clocks, etc) to compete
  • GF100 is using A3 making this the 3rd revision indicating a problem
  • No information regarding power consumption
source
Posted on Reply
#30
erocker
*
AthlonX2have patience young rhino the high end always comes first:)
High end isn't here yet. Do you know when we will see any mainstream cards from Nvidia, you see to be some sort of representative?
Posted on Reply
#31
Easy Rhino
Linux Advocate
it doesnt really matter in the end. there arent that many dx11 capable games right now and the ones that are dont look any different then their dx10 counterparts. also, i am running gtx280s in SLI and i can max every dx10 game out there at 1920x0180. so in my mind there really is no rush. im just mad at nvidia for not offering a mid range card after they pushed back the date again and again and again...
Posted on Reply
#32
erocker
*
Easy Rhinoit doesnt really matter in the end. there arent that many dx11 capable games right now and the ones that are dont look any different then their dx10 counterparts..
Dirt 2 looks much better than it's DX9 counterpart. No there isn't a lot of DX11 games, but it's already more popular than DX10 (DX9.1) was. If I was running GTX280's in SLi I would have no reason to change either.
Posted on Reply
#33
Fitseries3
Eleet Hardware Junkie
this is how i feel...

Posted on Reply
#34
-FOG-
ur right FIT, to SLI these it takes kinda alot for most of us and I assume their gonna draw alot of juice too..
Posted on Reply
#36
_33
ATI HD5890 please ;)
Posted on Reply
#37
n-ster
Black PantherI'm sure the retailer withdrew the listing? When I click www.sabrepc.com/p-174-xfx-geforce-gtx-480-2gb-gddr5-pci-express-x16-retail.aspx it asks me for a username and password....

Also how come it's going to be unveiled March 26th? What about the Fermi demo at the last CES? Perhaps I'm misunderstanding but wasn't that intended as an 'unveiling' or is a 'sneek-peek' something different?
EDIT: it is back up and still advertised
Posted on Reply
#38
jpierce55
I am more of an ATI fan, but still..... we need competition. Properly priced competition! I don't want a mid range g-card to start costing $300 :(.
Posted on Reply
#39
hat
Enthusiast
September? Aww, but they said Q1 2010....
Posted on Reply
#41
edilee012
Bingeomfgwtfbbq $699? Go screw yourself NV :laugh:
I have found the comments here amusing given teh fact that alot of folks here possible have an ATI 5970 in their machine that also costs $699. Until there are actual prices listed on merchants websites we should play "wait and see". That sabrepc site looks extremely fishy to me and is not able to be navigated to...getting a Windows pop up asking for a password before any page loads.

While trying to find more info on this card release I ran across on old web page back from when the 7800XT (think it was XT model but it was a 7800) was about to be released and the pricing was $849. When I purchased my 8800 GTS 512's the 8800 Ultra was selling for $800 and it was not a new product at that time.

We have no performance specs and really absolutely hardly any info to go on for Nvidia's new cards but from what Nvidia wants us to believe about the Fermi performance then $700 will be justified if it performs at or close to a 5970.

I am a fan of Nvidia products and as history shows us Nvidia products have always out performed ATI product and this has never changed. If both ATI and Nvidia have equally performing products on similar platforms then we as customers will win due to price cuts.

We need more info on these cards before we can draw any conclusion and I hope they deliver the performance Nvidia is leading us to believe they will as well as taking video card technology to a whole new level. Now we wait for the first benchmarks on these cards to surface.
Posted on Reply
#42
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
WHy do you think he was laughing about it then!?:shadedshu Also your comment isn't accurate at all.
Posted on Reply
#43
OneCool
Something tells me nvidia is going to debut a monster of a card.

I think the L1 & L2 caching,384bit mem interface,decent clocks and it should easily beat out the 5870 not sure about the 5970 but it will be close.
Posted on Reply
#44
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
considering how long it took them, it needs to be or this will be a 2900 without the fact of a buyout happening at the time that part was released.
Posted on Reply
#45
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
Bingeomfgwtfbbq $699? Go screw yourself NV :laugh:
Seriously, you all are going nuts over some random website's pre-order price?

I seem to remember the HD5800 pre-order prices to be very similar...

Don't judge the product until we know how much it actually costs, and how it actually performs.

I highly doubt they won't be competitive. If the GTX480 is more powerful than the HD5870, then it will cost more, however there will be lower cards that perform similar to the HD5870 that will likely cost the same. Just like the GTX200 series and the HD4000 series.
Posted on Reply
#46
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
boy ya'll are taking his post too far, he was being sarcastic is all.
Posted on Reply
#49
phanbuey
Someone needs to email these to nvidia.
Posted on Reply
#50
kid41212003
Lol, that's probably the best pic of the year.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 29th, 2024 13:38 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts