Monday, July 11th 2011
AMD FX-8130P Processor Benchmarks Surface
Here is a tasty scoop of benchmark results purported to be those of the AMD FX-8130P, the next high-end processor from the green team. The FX-8130P was paired with Gigabyte 990FXA-UD5 motherboard and 4 GB of dual-channel Kingston HyperX DDR3-2000 MHz memory running at DDR3-1866 MHz. A GeForce GTX 580 handled the graphics department. The chip was clocked at 3.20 GHz (16 x 200 MHz). Testing began with benchmarks that aren't very multi-core intensive, such as Super Pi 1M, where the chip clocked in at 19.5 seconds; AIDA64 Cache and Memory benchmark, where L1 cache seems to be extremely fast, while L2, L3, and memory performance is a slight improvement over the last generation of Phenom II processors.
Moving on to multi-threaded tests, Fritz Chess yielded a speed-up of over 29.5X over the set standard, with 14,197 kilonodes per second. x264 benchmark encoded first pass at roughly 136 fps, with roughly 45 fps in the second pass. The system scored 3045 points in PCMark7, and P6265 in 3DMark11 (performance preset). The results show that this chip will be highly competitive with Intel's LGA1155 Sandy Bridge quad-core chips, but as usual, we ask you to take the data with a pinch of salt.
Source:
DonanimHaber
317 Comments on AMD FX-8130P Processor Benchmarks Surface
BD definately not.
And if by any means a CPU could do that kind of thing, 1 core would do 1.5x 80 bit operations every cycle or 3 ops in 2 cycles, that is. It would be 1/2 as fast. As expected.
A single core is always able to issue to it's fullest providing there's enough available resources. If there are not enough resources then it will not improve with multi-threading either, becuse no matter how many threads you can put in, there's no ALU/FPUs to run that code. CMP cannot max out (issue) each of the cores normally because it can only issue instruction from a single thread to each core. Hence scaling is poor.
By issuing instructions to every core independently from which thread they belong to, CMT/SMT approaches scaling to +%100 (not really but let's assume). But never, I'll repeat, never a core will be able to run faster than his single core performance. Are you even considering how stupid your claims are?
Imagine rendering
1 core = 10 fps
2 cores = 28 fps
3 cores = 42 fps
4 cores = 56 fps
Please don't make us laugh and don't embarrass yourself even more...
I get what youre tryin to say, but...its kinda like annoying w/ all the percentages ...lol
Wait, WTF~!@? here did all his posts go? Did my browser freak out or are his crazy % figures deleted???
An AMD Zambezi Module provides 200% performance most programs can use all(100% per core)
An AMD Deneb/Zosma core provides 134% performance but most programs only used (2/3)s of that performance (90% per core)
Zambezi
100% -> 200% -> 300% -> 400% -> 500% -> 600% -> 700% -> 800%
Deneb/Zosma
134% -> 268% -> 402% -> 536% -> 670% -> 804%
Most programs(99% of the programs you use):
90% -> 180% -> 270% -> 360% -> 450% -> 540%
More realistic and easier to under the change from CMP to CMT
AMD could have easily stayed on CMP and just changed the "phenom II" core but
8x100% = 200% larger die
6x100% = 600%
4x150% = 600%
8 cores on one die with shared components instead of upgrading the socket to allow for a much larger die
Maybe we will see 4 core modules
3x200% = 600% ;)
One warning: Do not compare AMD architectures to Intel architectures, vice versa
Brain seizures happen and you lose reasoning and logic skills and make math errors
Until it's your friends and family.
I can agree with the electricity part though, it's the only thing stopping me from folding right now. I do commend those that are doing it though.
Folding figures out how proteins misfold
Any curing of diseases are a by product of researching the data of misfolding accumulated and tasked by the F@H grid
^not sure if I used the right wordsIntel has more markets than AMDActually it was the opposite...Llano $140(Max for an A8-3850) chips were better for gaming than $150 dual core sandy bridge
Llano is 32% more denser than Sandy Bridge as well(GloFo has the more advanced 32nm HKMG)
AMD's 3rd/4th quarter profits are gonna be sweet
Let the herd thin for christ sakes and realize life ain't fiar and niether is nature.
Llano 60% the GPU of i3s
39x in absolute brute force performance over an i7 2600K IGP
i3 have 3MB of L3
Llanos don'tRadiation, How much sun you get, How much electronics you are next to can all lead to a protein misfold not just GeneticsThey are meeting demand just fine
Computer Hardware, CPUs / Processors, Processors ...
I don't see out of stock yet
They get the new fabs up and running ot GloFo things will be just fine. I keep thinking they may just buy glofo back onces its profitable.