Saturday, December 17th 2011

The Witcher 2 Contains Secret Sauce To 'Catch 100% Of Pirates'

Yes, really - 100% of those pesky "pirates" will be brought to book! The game's studio, CD Projekt RED (CDP Red) isn't letting on how it's doing so, either, claiming it's a "trade secret" and not giving out the name of the external company that's implementing the anti-piracy technology, claiming that to do so would damage their business. Seriously. The problem with identifying a dodgy copy of something is that the main info they have to track them down, are the IP addresses of the suspect. This has been shown many times over now, not to be a reliable tracker of who's doing what. At the most, it will pinpoint the account holder that it relates to, in some cases. However, this outfit reckons they've nailed this dealbreaking problem once and for all - and without any evidence on how they go about it. Snake oil, perhaps? The Polish company have therefore been sending out legal notices to thousands of suspects in Germany, chosen because this country has some of the strictest copyright laws in Europe. Presumably, they must be leaning on the ISPs to hand over customers' physical street addresses, although this isn't made clear, but read on for how this might be accomplished. In an email to PC Gamer, CDP Red VP Michael Nowakowski made the following statement:
We're addressing only 100% confirmed piracy causes that are 100% possible to prove. We are not worried about tracking the wrong people. As this is the trade secret of the company working on this, I cannot share it. However, we investigated the subject before we decided on this move, and we aware of some past complications (the famous Davenport case). The method used here is targeting only 100% confirmed piracy cases. No innocent person was targeted with the letter so far. At least we have not received any information as of now which would indicate something like that.
Notice how the Davenport case is "famous" rather than "infamous" - they actually went down in flames over their extortion tactics. Also notice how they covered themselves by saying "At least we have not received any information as of now which would indicate something like that." So, they could be targeting the innocent after all, they just haven't heard about it. Nice.

So, there appears to be two options to how this tracking technology works:

1 There is no technology and this is just smoke and mirrors (with a dash of snake oil) designed to extort marks into coughing up money to make CD Projekt go away

2 They really do have some "tracking technology" in their games. Now, what could this be? Well, as they're not telling us, it's only right and proper to be highly suspicious of what it actually does and to put it in the same class as common criminal malware. This is because the only logical way that they can track the individual in any semi-reliable manner, is to lift personal information off their computer. Let's speculate on how this could be achieved. It would include stuff such as email logins, bank logins, Facebook logins, network traffic sniffing to read the contents of highly personal and confidential messages and any other login where personal information such as a name and address might be kept. You name it, they might be doing it. This kind of activity is of course highly illegal everywhere, so no wonder they'd want to keep quiet about it. It makes traditional draconian DRM schemes such as SecuROM and the like seem like a walk in the park by comparison, doesn't it?

So, do you really want to install software that does some or all of this on your computer, just to play a lousy video game? Obviously, that's a resounding NO!

Regardless of how they track down suspects, this exercise is extortion with a legal veneer, pure and simple. This is because there haven't been any independent studies showing that "piracy" reduces profits and makes companies go to the wall - they have all been big media industry sponsored. However, there are several independent studies that show it does nothing, or actually enhances sales by indirect means, such as reputation spread by word of mouth. Of course, the powerful media cartels based in America, are able to buy government reps all over the world to make them pass corrupt laws as if all this "piracy" really was hurting them - three strikes, PROTECT IP & SOPA are just three examples. Consider the blockbusting sales here and here of Modern Warfare 3 recently. This will be the most "pirated" game of all, yet it still outsold all of Hollywood put together...

There is of course, one sure fire and legal way to beat a company that tries such dirty tricks: the boycott. Don't buy their products and don't pirate them, then laugh as you watch them go under (all the while still blaming alleged "piracy", of course). I personally wholeheartedly recommend this course of action. Once again www.techdirt.com is recommended as the site to go to, as they expose abuses like this daily.
Sources: TG Daily, PC Gamer
Add your own comment

345 Comments on The Witcher 2 Contains Secret Sauce To 'Catch 100% Of Pirates'

#276
qubit
Overclocked quantum bit
badtaylorxsounds like the op has some pirated games to me....
I do not. You shouldn't go making accusations like that.
Posted on Reply
#277
digibucc
don't you know Q, people only need .6 posts in order to know everything about you. if it seems they are wrong you are just being dishonest. rule #44 of the internet.
Posted on Reply
#278
Blacklash
If there is nothing wrong with pirating games why do the folks defending it get upset when someone suggests they may engage in the activity?

I don't expect people that do pirate games to get on their rooftops and scream, "I pirate software!" On the other hand, I don't expect people who aggressively support such things to be outraged or indignant if people suspect them of pirating.

If I was vehemently arguing on a forum for the legalization weed, I wouldn't be surprised if people suspected that I blaze. If it could bring me trouble, I simply wouldn't confirm or deny.
Posted on Reply
#279
digibucc
BlacklashIf there is nothing wrong with pirating games why do the folks defending it get upset when someone suggests they may engage in the activity?
it's amazing how many times it can be said and people still don't even want to recognize the argument. just because you disagree with the way publishers are handling the issue doesn't mean you are a pirate. just because you recognize that the word steal doesn't apply to situations where nothing is actually physically removed, doesn't mean you are a pirate. just because you don't fall in line and eat the lies doesn't mean you are a pirate.

it is entirely possible to recognize the lies, price gouging, and general disdain for customers that the game industry contains - while at the same time refraining from illegally downloading software. And when you assume we are pirates ourselves, from your base argument you are personally calling us thieves. do you really expect us to not become upset with that ? not to mention there is simply no need to make assumptions about someones personal character, just because they disagree with you. if you can't add anything more than that to the discussion, imho you don't really deserve to be a part of it
Posted on Reply
#280
Wile E
Power User
This news story is not true. Reread the PCGamer source.

There is no mention of tracking software being installed anywhere. The are monitoring piracy sites, and using that to catch people in some manner.
Posted on Reply
#281
Blacklash
I did not say people who defend pirating are pirates.

I said it's not >surprising< that some may suspect others of it if they vigorously defend such a position.

I support gay rights however I'm straight. I don't become indignant if people accuse me of being gay. Why? I don't find being gay morally objectionable.
Posted on Reply
#282
digibucc
BlacklashI support gay rights however I'm straight. I don't become indignant if people accuse me of being gay. Why? I don't find being gay morally objectionable.
I don't "support" piracy. i don't know who on here actually does, save maybe for newt - and he's been silent here. replace every instance of "are a pirate" with "support piracy" (in my last post) and maybe it'll be clearer.

Also - you are not (i don't think) currently in a discussion ABOUT homosexuality. no one is calling you gay in order to personally disparage you in an attempt to evade the fact that they have nothing to add, or can't logically respond to an argument. it's bad enough when people assume knowledge and use insults out of ignorance - when it's a deliberate attempt to derail and defame... yeah that's a little annoying
Posted on Reply
#283
qubit
Overclocked quantum bit
Wile EThis news story is not true. Reread the PCGamer source.

There is no mention of tracking software being installed anywhere. The are monitoring piracy sites, and using that to catch people in some manner.
Yes, they're using those torrent sites as a starting point. However, as has been mentioned in the PC Gamer article and widely shown elsewhere, accurately targeting individuals using this method is next to impossible. Then, as they are being all cagey about revealing their methods or which company they're using, I speculated on how they could be achieving this alleged "100%" success rate, which sounds highly dubious to myself and the authors of the source articles - and I clearly stated that it was speculation in my story. The fact is that short on spying on users by lifting their details off their PCs you just can't identify them with any accuracy.

Yes, they should come clean on what methods they're using and I don't buy the argument that it would compromise their ability to catch people. If their methods are really so legal and benign, then they shouldn't have a problem discussing them.
Posted on Reply
#284
Wile E
Power User
I don't disagree they should come clean. But it shouldn't be assumed that it's software that gets installed on our computer, and your aticle takes a heavy bias in that direction, with no real facts to base it on.

Then the part about how them tracking down suspected pirates is extortion is also something I strongly disagree with. They have a right to protect their intellectual property. It doesn't matter what effect piracy has on the issue, it's taking something you were not authorized to take, and is therefore illegal. The monetary ramifications on the gaming industry are irrelevant.
Posted on Reply
#285
digibucc
Wile EThen the part about how them tracking down suspected pirates is extortion is also something I strongly disagree with.
that's something a us judge has agreed with. tracking down actual pirates is obviously fine - but when you just send letters that demand $1000 or you will be brought to court - and people who definitely, 100% did not pirate get caught in that net - and not just caught, but they were aimed for -then it is extortion, and that's what the us judge and i believe qubit were referring to - not to speak for either.
Posted on Reply
#286
Wile E
Power User
digibuccthat's something a us judge has agreed with. tracking down actual pirates is obviously fine - but when you just send letters that demand $1000 or you will be brought to court - and people who definitely, 100% did not pirate get caught in that net - and not just caught, but they were aimed for -then it is extortion, and that's what the us judge and i believe qubit were referring to - not to speak for either.
Still can't assume it's extortion when we don't know how much compensation they are demanding. The judge only agreed that unnaturally inflated amounts are extortion, not legitimate amounts.
Posted on Reply
#287
qubit
Overclocked quantum bit
Wile EI don't disagree they should come clean. But it shouldn't be assumed that it's software that gets installed on our computer, and your aticle takes a heavy bias in that direction, with no real facts to base it on.
Well, I did say it was speculation. :) But it's very reasonable and plausible speculation. If you have a better suggestion of how they can do this without spyware, I'd be interested to hear it.
Wile EThen the part about how them tracking down suspected pirates is extortion is also something I strongly disagree with. They have a right to protect their intellectual property. It doesn't matter what effect piracy has on the issue, it's taking something you were not authorized to take, and is therefore illegal. The monetary ramifications on the gaming industry are irrelevant.
Yes, it's extortion. Demanding money/compensation from someone without actually demonstrating any losses from their actions is extortion. This is regardless of the legality or morality of the target's initial action (the alleged piracy here). It's particularly out of order and extortionate when you have some big corporation going after an individual whom they know damned well doesn't have the resources (ie money) to fight back. Regardless of their guilt or innocence, they're just gonna pay up, because they are forced to and these big companies totally rely on that. In fact, they CD Projekt actually admitted that none of the cases had actually reached court. And I can tell you that's the way they want it to stay, lest their little extortion scams get scrutinized to closely, like happened in England. Davenport Lyons & ACS Law the two scam artists who tried this scam on people got destroyed by the courts in the end, didn't they?
Posted on Reply
#288
Wile E
Power User
It is not reasonable or plausible to speculate it's something installed on our computers when the sources you used for this editorial make no mention of anything being installed. There are no facts to back your speculation.

It's not extortion if they have valid claims against the subject, and the amount demanded is not exorbitant. If they have proof a person pirated it, they have a valid claim. You simply do not have enough facts on this issue to be able to label it extortion.
Posted on Reply
#289
qubit
Overclocked quantum bit
Wile EIt is not reasonable or plausible to speculate it's something installed on our computers when the sources you used for this editorial make no mention of anything being installed. There are no facts to back your speculation.
The sources don't have to say it. It's just a bit of deductive reasoning from the facts in the source stories. Seriously, how do you think they can identify individuals with such accuracy without doing this?
Wile EIt's not extortion if they have valid claims against the subject, and the amount demanded is not exorbitant. If they have proof a person pirated it, they have a valid claim. You simply do not have enough facts on this issue to be able to label it extortion.
Claiming any amount without proving damages is extortion. I don't care whether the law legally allow them to do so or not, in my book, it's extortion. For every other crime on the planet, the plaintiff has to show some kind of loss - except for bloody copyright. :rolleyes: This is some kind of hallowed ground where they can just claim without showing any kind of losses. What kind of BS is this? :shadedshu And my point about big corps just squeezing the little guy regardless of guilt is still valid - you've not addressed this.
Posted on Reply
#290
Wile E
Power User
qubitThe sources don't have to say it. It's just a bit of deductive reasoning from the facts in the source stories. Seriously, how do you think they can identify individuals with such accuracy without doing this?



Claiming any amount without proving damages is extortion. I don't care whether the law legally allow them to do so or not, in my book, it's extortion. For every other crime on the planet, the plaintiff has to show some kind of loss - except for bloody copyright. :rolleyes: This is some kind of hallowed ground where they can just claim without showing any kind of losses. What kind of BS is this? :shadedshu And my point about big corps just squeezing the little guy regardless of guilt is still valid - you've not addressed this.
They are only claiming accuracy. They have provided no proof. Again, no facts to back the theory at all. It's not a reasonable assumption in the slightest with so few facts.

If you have a copy of the game that was not obtained legitimately, you need to pay the retail value for that game, plus any costs associated with them having to take legal action. If you do not want to obtain the game legitimately, you don't get to have it, period. It's pretty cut and dry to me. There is no gray area. This is not extortion if all they are asking is for the cost of the game plus any legitimate legal fees. That is 100% reasonable.
Posted on Reply
#291
Frick
Fishfaced Nincompoop
qubitI don't care whether the law legally allow them to do so or not, in my book, it's extortion.
This is one of the main issues have with your entire argument. Why would you be above the law?
Posted on Reply
#292
digibucc
FrickThis is one of the main issues have with your entire argument. Why would you be above the law?
he never said he was above it, he said that's how he viewed it. if you blindly obey the law with no thought to morality or ethics ... that's something i have an issue with. do you know how complicated the law is? how many things are illegal? i would bet that you do something illegal every day without even noticing it.

if the law were set by hitler or pol pot, does it have as much weight then? well then who are YOU to decide whose laws are worth following and whose aren't? we don't have that right?
badtaylorxbut your staunch defense of software pirating certainly makes it sound that way....
he's not defending piracy - i don't think anyone here actually is. he is defending the innocent people who get snared in the extortion trap. i don't get why it is so hard to separate the two. there is more to the argument than they are pirates, pirates = thieves, end of story. the publishers actions DO matter, regardless of what caused them. the have repercussions and to just shift that blame to "pirates" is simply an attempt to scapegoat, though a good one at that.
Posted on Reply
#293
badtaylorx
qubitI do not. You shouldn't go making accusations like that.
but your staunch defense of software pirating certainly makes it sound that way....

btw...an accusation would start out "you are"

not "sounds like"
digibuccdon't you know Q, people only need .6 posts in order to know everything about you. if it seems they are wrong you are just being dishonest. rule #44 of the internet.
common sense is all we need here...

anybody know the difference between a brown-noser and an a$s kisser???

depth perception
Posted on Reply
#294
Legacy-ZA
Pffft, there is already a problem that I can see with this thing, it tracks your IP address? Ooooooo brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, I am sure you got them running scared now...
All they will have to do is; Open Firewall, block all incoming/outgoing traffic / Remove LAN cable / switch off router... good luck "tracking" that IP /rolls eyes
Posted on Reply
#295
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
Legacy-ZAPffft, there is already a problem that I can see with this thing, it tracks your IP address? Ooooooo brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, I am sure you got them running scared now...
All they will have to do is; Open Firewall, block all incoming/outgoing traffic / Remove LAN cable / switch off router... good luck "tracking" that IP /rolls eyes
they're still talking about when you download the game in the first place via torrents, not about software in the game itself.


despite the theories about software being used to track you, all the comments from the sourcem materials sound like they're just checking IP's from the torrents again.
Posted on Reply
#296
Legacy-ZA
Musselsthey're still talking about when you download the game in the first place via torrents, not about software in the game itself.


despite the theories about software being used to track you, all the comments from the sourcem materials sound like they're just checking IP's from the torrents again.
What you say is true. :)

But (there is always a but isn't there? :D) I wouldn't get my hopes up too much, I am sure there will be pirate that will create some sort of "3rd party tool" that will block their eyes, they always seem to find away around the system.
Posted on Reply
#297
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
Legacy-ZAWhat you say is true. :)

But (there is always a but isn't there? :D) I wouldn't get my hopes up too much, I am sure there will be pirate that will create some sort of "3rd party tool" that will block their eyes, they always seem to find away around the system.
seedbox or someome elses internet. its why IP tracking is so crap.

one person can download it and share it to 50 other people or 5,000 so the IP addresses really are worthless.
Posted on Reply
#298
Legacy-ZA
Musselsseedbox or someome elses internet. its why IP tracking is so crap.

one person can download it and share it to 50 other people or 5,000 so the IP addresses really are worthless.
I concur. :)
Posted on Reply
#299
qubit
Overclocked quantum bit
badtaylorxbut your staunch defense of software pirating certainly makes it sound that way....

btw...an accusation would start out "you are"

not "sounds like"
I'm not "staunchly defending piracy". :rolleyes: I'm against underhand methods to try and track people down for it, as I've explained very clearly in the article and in posts in this thread. Or put another way, just because someone may or may not be committing an illegal act against you, doesn't give you the right to engage in illegal acts yourself to get to them. That's basic law and order.

btw, no I don't see this whole "piracy" issue as such a big problem, as I've said. That doesn't change anything, either. ;)

Finally, an accusation can made any way one likes and yours was a semi-veiled and not very subtle one, so don't BS me that you weren't.
Posted on Reply
#300
digibucc
Legacy-ZAI concur. :)
Damnit! Why didn't I concur !?
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 19th, 2024 14:05 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts