Friday, October 4th 2013
ASUS Radeon R9 280X MATRIX Graphics Card Pictured
ASUS is working on an ROG MATRIX graphics card based on AMD's "new" Radeon R9 280X chip. Pictured below, the card features a meaty triple-slot cooling solution, and the same PCB as the one ASUS' HD 7970 MATRIX is based on, featuring a gargantuan 20-phase VRM, with TweakIT and ProbeIT mojo, fan panic switch, and dual BIOS. The card is expected to feature factory-overclocked speeds of 1100 MHz core, and 6.00 GHz memory. Given that these are pictures of a retail card, with its packaging, one can expect ASUS to launch the card along with its other SKUs, when the R9 280X is generally available.
Source:
VideoCardz
46 Comments on ASUS Radeon R9 280X MATRIX Graphics Card Pictured
Pun intended.
Matrix-HD7970-3GD5 1000core/1050boost, 6000 mem (effective), and
Matrix-HD7970-P-3GD5 -Which is the Matrix Platinum: 1050core/1100boost, 6600 mem. (effective).
Asus didn't go out of their way to distinguish the two SKUs very well
BTW I thought there were to be no non-reference designs for a while?? Looks like they are ready to go!!
I hope they change their mind
I'm not sure what to expect from the 280x. Nvidia's re-brand of the 680-770 was able to eek out a bit of extra performance with slightly lighter power consumption, overall having what I might describe as "more finesse" in the 770. Ofc it comes down to price, and the 280x will benefit from all the 2013 coolers from board manufacturers, who mostly outdid themselves, but other than that, it's not likely anybody is going to top 1100mhz?
Speaking of price, as previously mentioned, Matrix is down to £260 in the uk, and other models creeping as low as £230 and some deals at £210. I'm dubious as to whether AMD's 300 dollar pricing might be a bit of a damp squib in the uk (considering the usual markup).
Anyway...rambling...roll on the 8th.
reeeeeaaaaly now? ¬_____¬
unless You are thinking of ditching it for water cooling or something....
I've been assessing all the speculation and it been these are just re-brand Tahiti parts. But I'm thinking not... In that, I don't see how AMD could command mainstream market with Tahiti efficiency and part that's 65% larger than Pitcairn, which was a great size/perf/TDP offering. Do I think the CU/ROP count are all that different from Tahiti... not by any huge numbers, but how those bits are arranged need improvement. Could there be a slight lessening of CU/ROP with more tuning to the size of the die, while efficiency is improved? Basically pack a chip between Pitcairn and Tahiti, I sense it all points back to Bonaire?
Is there any definite confirmation to point that AMD is saying they’re absolutely re-branding Tahiti parts? Has anyone seen a pic of the backside of a R9 280X to get an idea of the pinout. I think the true point would be that a "new" chip would in most case deem a new PCB.
I'm not meaning to get all up into this, but logically (I use that loosely) while AMD has been selling Tahiti for less than $200, I don't believe such a mainstream cost structure could endure for next 8-10 months that way.